Zaid Hamid Fans: Dr Israr Supported Takmeel, ZHE Fans: Show Us The Proof

Zaid Hamid fans are making interesting statements on Facebook. They are trying to create a perception that Dr Israr’s views were against the press releases that Tanzeem issued against Zaid Hamid.

See Tanzeem’s press releases:

Zaid Hamid’s fans further claim that they knew about the real views of Dr Israr, because they went to meet him on this issue. The claims of Zaid Hamid fans follow:

Claim

Ibraheem Naeem @anas: For ur information, Tanzeem-e-islami’s official press releases are given by the Ameer of the tanzeeb, and the ameer wasnt Dr Israr, it was his son Aqib. Dr sahab’s views abt zaid sb is not portrayed in the press release. Keep tht in mind. We kno his views abt zaid sb becoz we went to him n asked him. He said he fully supported the takmeel-e-pakistan movement frm his heart. And he said whoever will come to him to ask abt zaid sb, he will tell him only good things abt zaid sb. But he said he cudnt officially say anything frm tanzeem’s platform becoz he was no longer the ameer, and if he did say anything without the ameer’s approval, it would go against his own rules of the tanzeem tht he had set.

Anyways, we dont have any proof to give to u in this regard, but we dont care becoz we kno the truth n thts wht matters to us. He was very loving to us. He was a great man. A man of great knowledge too.

Ibraheem Naeem further adds:

Ibraheem Naeem N btw, the ameer Aqib was double minded abt zaid sb. tht was the problem. Dr Israr’s other 2 sons were supportive of zaid sb too.

Refutation

One of the fans of Zaid Hamid Exposition has written a stunning and categorical refutation of these claims. The refutation follows below:

Umm Imaarah @ Ibraheem,

Tanzeem-e-islami’s official press releases are given by the Ameer of the tanzeeb, and the ameer wasnt Dr Israr, it was his son Aqib.

This is true, but being the Ameer/leader of the organisation all memebers of the organisation have given bayt to him by doing doing so, it means that they all endorse what the final official decision is . This being what has been written 2nd press release by the organisation .

http://www.box.net/shared/iazerc5qeu

Dr sahab’s views abt zaid sb is not portrayed in the press release.

This is not true, being the member of Tanzeem he would also follow the exact view of the press release. He is obligated to, as explained above

We kno his views abt zaid sb becoz we went to him n asked him. He said he fully supported the takmeel-epakistan movement frm his heart. And he said whoever will come to him to ask abt zaid sb, he will tell him only good things abt zaid sb. But he said he cudnt officially say anything frm tanzeem’s platform becoz he was no longer the ameer, and if he did say anything without the ameer’s approval, it would go against his own rules of the tanzeem tht he had set.

Unfortunatly, this means that YOU are publicly claiming here, on a public fora, that he was against the actual official stand of Tanzeem on the matter of Zaid Hamid . Therefore, your statement points towards, Dr Israr (ra) being, a official member of Tanzeem, was either a Munafiq ( which I highly doubt as there is no evidence by his apparent to prove this ) or that you are not telling the truth. So which is it Ibraheem ?

Anyways, we dont have any proof to give to u in this regard, but we dont care becoz we kno the truth n thts wht matters to us.

Well , it is very important you provide proof to your claim especially since you are advocating it on a public forum. especially a view of an individual who is unable to verify it. And most importantly you are attributing a stand which is completely contradictory to what his official stand was ( being a member of Tanzeem ) therefore confusing the matter in hand for others .

Furthermore, by writing what you have in a public domain you are actually influencing others, who are reading your post By providing such a contradictory views on the issue one can consider it as morally unethical, that is if you do not back your claim with solid proofs.

So you should care really . especially since you’ve written this in a public arena.

He was very loving to us. He was a great man. A man of great knowledge too.

Yes Alhamdulillah, he was. May Allaah (swt) increase his rank in The Hereafter and accept him in Jannatul Firdous…Ameen

He is an example to follow. A true Momin ( InshAllaah). Never minced his words ever and stood true to his beliefs till the end !!

This is a video on what he believed about Khatme Nabuwwat

Its clear there is no contracdiction from the above and that of the last press release from Tanzeem on what he stood for on the matter.

You also say N btw, the ameer Aqib was double minded abt zaid sb. tht was the problem. Dr Israr’s other 2 sons were supportive of zaid sb too.

Could you back this with solid proof also, since you are announcing this on a public fora too. Therefore lending information on a matter which would influence other people. I’m sure this can easily be arranged, if it is the truth.

One must understand, thie issue of Zaid Hamid is no casual matter. And by you making claims on other peoples behalf would require some concrete evidence from those who you have taken the liberty to write about and make a claim for. If not, then it would be advisable that you delete your comments instead !!

I hope you can understand the importance of what I have said. Because, as Muslims one wouldn’t want to be known as indulging in “Bhutaan”

Final Remark

Can anyone believe that Zaid Hamid wont bring forward the “real views” of Dr Israr Ahmed RA had their been these so-called “real views” ?

If there had been any statement by Dr Israr, which has even hinted that Yusuf was not a Kazab – Zaid Hamid would have been drumming it like Moulana Niazi’s statements and all of us would have been aware of those “real-views” of Dr Israr by now.

What sort of a double standard is this, that Zaid Hamid fans ask the people who are against Zaid Hamid to bring evidence and proof of whatever they say, but in defence of their own claims and statements they only have to say the following:

Anyways, we dont have any proof to give to u in this regard, but we dont care becoz we kno the truth n thts wht matters to us.

Yusuf Kazab's Certificate of Khalifa e Azam Was Actually A Claim Of Prophethood

In his 58 mins leaked video, Zaid Hamid claims that Yusuf Kazab never claimed to be a prophet, all that he claimed was to be a Khalifa – and according to the Holy Quran – every man is a Khalifa. What Zaid Hamid forgets to tell is that Yusuf Kazab didnt claimed to be a Khalifa, but claimed to be a Khalifa e Azam of Prophet Muhammad saaw. As a proof of this claim Yusuf Kazab produced a document in court, which he referred to as Certificate of Khalifa e Azam and claimed that this certificate was directly awarded to him by Prophet Muhammad saaw.

This article is divided into three parts:

  1. Ismail Quraishi’s (lawyer of AMTKN) discussion on the Certificate of Khalifa e Azam produced by Yusuf Kazab in Court.
  2. Yusuf Kazab’s own statements that he gave in court on questions asked by Ismail Quraishi regarding the Certificate of Khalifa e Azam that Yusuf produced in court.
  3. The Discussion and Verdict of the Honorable Judge on the Certificate of Khalifa e Azam produced by Yusuf Kazab in court.

Ismail Quraishi’s Discussion on the Certificate of Khalifa e Azam Produced by Yusuf Kazab in Court

After the court judgement Zaid Hamid wrote an article in Daily DAWN and declared the judgement to be a murder of Justice. Zaid Hamid’s article that appeared in Daily DAWN can be read here. On this, the prosecution party, i.e. AMTKN decided to publish the court judgement in book form so that it becomes a record and anyone could access it and see for himself/herself that Yusuf Kazab was indeed a Kazab and the Court Judgement was not a murder of justice as Zaid Hamid claimed. Ismail Quraishi, the lawyer who fought the case against Yusuf Kazab, wrote a foreword for this book format of the court judgement. The complete foreword could be read in our Article titled The Truth About Yusuf Kazab Blasphemy Case. In his foreword Ismail Quraishi has discussed the Certificate of Khalifa e Azam produced by Yusuf Kazab in court. That discussion is being reproduced below:

He [Yusuf Kazab] has submitted a document which has been exhibited as 111. by the trial court and is also part of this book as Schedule I. About this document he claimed that it was certificate directly soul to him by the Holy Prophet (PBUH) declaring him to be Khalifa-i-Aazam. According to admission in the cross examination by me all the Prophets were appointed as Khalifas i.e. vicegerents of God on earth and the Holy Prophet (PBUH) is Klialila-i-Azam. chief vicegerent, so by virtue of this certificate, now he is Khalifa-i-Azam on earth. He further admitted in the cross examination that neither one of four Caliphs was holding the high office of Khalifa-i-Azam. In an answer to the Question he said this certificate of Khalifa-i-Azam from the Holy Prophet was sent to him by a saint of Karachi, Abdullah Shah Ghazi through the medium of computer on his letter pad. It is interesting to note that the said saint of Karachi had died 300 year ago. In the said certificate which is in English, the convict has been addressed by the Holy Prophet (PBUH) as Khalifa-e-Azam, Hazrat Imam Al-Shcikh Abu A.H. Muhammod Yusuf All. In the said certificate the convict has been declared that his knowledge is all encompassing and his wisdom is supreme. In explanation of this declaration the convict said that he is commentator of Holy Quran. He knows all about Hadees and Fiqh. He is master of Tassawwuf and also knows all the worldly sciences. In order to testify his all encompassing knowledge and wisdom, I cross examined him in regard to his religious knowledge and put questions relating to modern scientific research. I would like to mention here that the convict has stated in the court that he has been receiving all the messages direct from the Holy Prophet (PBUH) either in Arabic or English. I asked him His connotation of Quranic word “Taqwa”, but he was unable to answer. 1 asked him the meaning of “amplitude” and “resurrection”, the words on the top of the certificate of Khalifa-i-Azam, but he miserably failed to tell the simple meanings of these words. He was unable to tell even the names of six authentic books of Hadees (Sihah Sittah), known and respected all over the Muslim world after the Holy Quran. He has no knowledge of a very famous Hadees of Madinatul Ilm in respect of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and Hazrat Ali (RA) despite his claim of being Al-i-Rasool, descendant of the Holy Prophet (PBUH), whereas he is Bhatti by caste according to his school certificate. His name was Yusuf Ali according to school & college certificates and service record (Schedule II), He added “Muhammad” after retirement with malicious design to doge and defraud people for gelling huge amount and property worth millions of rupees by means of deception in the name of the Holy Prophet (PBUH). These facts have been proved by his own admissions and admitted documents. Kindly see the judgment.

Ismail Quraishi further adds in his foreword that …

With this background, the convict Yusuf Ali followed the footsteps of Mirza Ghulam Ahmed and proved himself by oral and documentary evidence that he is true successor in interest of his predecessor impostor. First he approached to the religious quarter as preacher of Islam, then as Mard-e-Kamil, thereafter as Imam-al-Waqt i.e. Mehdi, the next step after Mehdi was declaring himself as Khalifa-i-Azam, We have already given details of soli upgrading. He then claimed himself to be the Holy Prophet (PBUH) before the followers in the basement named as Ghar-i-Hira. Like Ghulam Ahmed Mirza he was also not satisfied with this so called claim therefore finally in order to show himself greater than the last Prophet of Allah (PBUH) he declared that 1400 years back the Holy Prophet was on duty, but in the present times he has attained the perfection and finality of the prophethood by beauty.

Statements Of Muhammad Yusuf Ali Regarding Certificate of Khilafat e Azam

Yusuf Ali gave the following statements in response to various questions asked by Advocate Ismail Quraishi regarding the Certificate of Khilafat e Azam. The statement was recorded in multiple hearings, therefore pieces of the statement have different dates. What follows below are the actual words of Yusuf Ali.

R.O & A.C.

19-07-2000.

19.07.2000. Statement of Mohammad Yousaf Ali,

accused (Recalled on oath)

XXXXX By learned counsel for the complainant.

It is correct that the document Exh.DL is the Certificate relating to the spiritual aspect awarded to me by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) as the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) awards Spiritual Certificate of this nature. It is correct that in the document Exh.DL, the sentence ‘Khalif-e-Azam Hazoor Syed-e-Na-Mohammad (Peace Be Upon Him) Ka-Khalif-e-Azam Hazrat Imam (Al Sheikh) Abu AH-Mohammad Yousaf Ali is the ‘Laqab’ awarded to me by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). Volunteers that in accordance with Surat Hajj Verse No. 78, every Muslim after all efforts should prove himself as ‘Khalifa’ of Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) subject to His confirmation. It is correct that the portion “M” to “M” is the part and parcel of document Exh.DL. This ‘Shahadat’ has been awarded to us by Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi and this Shahadat has also been given by the other Aulia-e-Karam. All Aula-e-Karam are alive and this Shahadat has been awarded by them. I cannot say that this Shahadat has been given by the ‘Aula-e-Karam at the instance of our Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) or not. The Portion “N’ to “N as given in document Exh.DL, is Alhamdulillah correct and it is for me. I know ‘English’, ‘Urdu’, ‘Punjabi’, little ‘Arabic’, little ‘Persian’ and the language of ‘love’. The language of love means the love and affection if awarded to any body by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). It is correct that I am expert in Philosophy, Psychology, Modern Science or in any other subject nor I have learnt these subjects through Books except that I have been tutored by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) and the knowledge like mirror, as referred in page No. 175 of the Book titled ‘Khutbat-e-Nabuwwat (Exh.D/II) compiled by Maulana Mohammad Ismail Shujaabadi, which I mean as under:-

‘Ana-Madinatul-Ilam-Wa-Ali-Babuha, announced by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) is the part of Hadith and it is correct. I have not studied ‘Hi.kmat-ul-Ishraq’ in Philosophy. Volunteers that there is no knowledge of the mirror and that the mirror has only to reflect. It is correct that I had been staying in Europe. I have not heard the name of Averor. The meaning of supreme wisdom, as used in document Exh.DL is that I am nothing. I have not read the Book as ‘Kitabul’ Tawaseen’. It may be correct that just by chance I have referred the said Book in my statement before this court. I do not know Dr. Mycinu. I do not know Hussain-ibne-Mansoor’ exactly but I have heard about him. I have heard that Hussain-Ibne-Mansoor is also known as ‘Hallaj. It is incorrect that he was hanged. Volunteers that his body was cut into pieces and he was killed in the way. I have not dictated for myself as ‘Ahl-e-Bayat’ but I wish so Volunteers that eveyr ‘Muttaqi’ is ‘Ahl-e-Rasool (Peace Be Upon Him). Taqva’ is defined in Surat Baqra Verses No. 3 and 4′. The meaning of ‘Mutaqqi’ is also given of Verses of Surat Baqra, referred by me. There is difference in between ‘Ahle-Rasool (Peace Be Upon Him) and Ahle-e-Bayat-e-Rasool (Peace Be Upon Him). The children of the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) are ‘Aal-e-Mohammad (Peace Be Upon Him) while ‘Aal-e-Rasool (Peace Be Upon Him) means all ‘Mutaqqi’ ctatpH that the Sahaba people. It is means the companion, members can be called as ‘Ahle-e-Bayat. Volunteers that ‘Ahl-e-Bayat Rasool (Peace Be Upon Him) is different terminology and simple ‘Ahl-e-Bayat’ is different. It is correct that my name by birth was ‘Mohammad’ but later on my parents got written the name as ‘Yousaf Ali, in the Admission Form of the School and also in the College. My name as ‘Yousaf Ali Nadeem’ was written in the 9th Class and since it was difficult to have changed the name, therefore, my name as ‘Yousaf AH Nadeem’ was written upto my service record. As soon as I left the service, I got my name corrected as ‘Mohammad Yousaf Ali’. It is correct that my name as ‘Yousaf Ali Nadeem’ used to be written in the College.

The word ‘Nadeem’ was added in my name in 9th Class. My name as ‘Yousaf Ali Nadeem’ has been written in the Matriculation Certificate and simply ‘Yousaf Ali’ was written in the Primary-Certificate. No one can as being the person write ‘Sallaho Alhe-Wassalam’ over the name Mohammad if Mohammad is part of the name of any person. It is correct that in the documents Exh.DL and DM I have written my name as ‘Mohammad Yousaf Ali’.

At this statge, there is a dispute that as to whether any fluid has been used in the document Exh.DL and DM over the name of ‘Mohammad’ to override ‘Sallaho Alhe-Wassalam’ the abbreviation written on the name of ‘Mohammad’, on which the learned defence counsel has shown the original documents in their custody but by the mirror (Magnified Glass) if seen carefully there appears the use of fluid but this dispute shall be resolved later on at the stage of arguments and whatsoever the original documents are, those shall remain with the accused as same have not been produced on the last date.

Upon a request of the learned defense counsel this fact is also brought on record that on the last date the originals of Exh.DL and DM were returned to the learned defence counsel.

(The remaining statement of the accused shall be recorded on the next date).

R.O. & A.C.

19.7.2000.

Statement of Mohammad Yousaf Ali,

accused, (Recalled on oath.

XXXXX By learned consel for the complainant.

Through Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi Rehmatullah-Ale, I came to know that all Aolia-e-Karam have verified this Certificate Exh.DL. Apparently and Physirally Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi has passed away.

The shrine of Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi is in Karachi. I do not know the date or the period with regard to the passing away of Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi. Prior to the information, as mentioned by me, as above, I had no knowledge about ‘Silsila-e-Tasawwuf of Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi as to where he is connected. Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi informed me about the contents of the Certificate Exh.DL indirectly. It was my spiritual experience and I was on receiving end. I received Certificate Exh.DL directly from the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) but it was verified indirectly by the ‘Aolia-e-Karam’ through Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi. Volunteers that this Certificate was received spiritually and I cannot tell the details in this regard. I had received the document Exh.DL spiritually and I cannot tell its detail that as to whether I received document Exh.DL, eitehr typed or un-typed. It is correct that document Exh.DL is computerised/typed document. I had got this document Exh.DL. computerised/typed from Islamabad. It is correct that whatsoever is feeded to the Computer, it may be returned in the shape of a document. It is correct that there may be a change in feeding of the Computer and receiving of the document if some change is caused therein. Definitely the verification (tasdeeq) of Hazrat Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jillani, Imam-e-Aolia would be included in the verification as explained by me. Since I was informed I that its verification is from all Aolia, therefore, the | verification by Hazrat Junaid Bughdadi, Syed-e-Taifa, is also included therein. I am not aware of all Sufic-ordes. ‘ Volunteers that since I had received training directly from the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him), therefore, I have no contact with the ‘Aolia-e-Karam. It is correct that first of all Hazrat Adam Alahe-Salam was bestowed with Khilafat. Volunteers that the Khilafat bestowed to Hazrat Adam Alah-e-Salam bestowed to the Prophets upto Hazrat Issa Alah-e-Salam was Khilafat of Hazoor Mohammad Nabiul Ummi (Peace Be Upon Him). After

the ‘Wisaal’ of the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) the Khilafat went to ‘Khulfa-e-Rashideen’ and first of all to Hazrat Abubakar Siddique Razi Allah Tala Anho. I do not know the details of Khilafat bestowed to Hazrat Abubakar Siddique Razi Allah Tala Anho. I do not know if Hazrat Abubakar Siddique Razi Allah Tala Anho after receiving the Khilafat called himself ‘Khalif-tur-Rasool’. I do not know the details to ‘Khutba’ delivered in the ‘Masjid-e-Nabwi’ by Hazrat Abubakar Siddique Razi Allah Tala Anho….

… I do not know the Writer of document Exh.DL, I know as to who had typed this document (Exh.DL) but I cannot tell his name. It is incorrect that since I do not know the name who typed document Exh.DL, therefore am not telling his name. I have not shown document Exh.DL to –

R.O. & A.C.

20.7.2000

Statement of Mohammad Yousaf Ali,

accused Recalled on oath.

XXXXX By the learned counsel for the complainant.

I know ‘Siha Sitta’ which are six in number. Sahi Bokhari Sharif, Sahi Muslim Sharif, Mota Imam Malik and others, and also Musnad Imam Ahmed Bin Hambal. Abu Dawood and Tirmizi Sharif. I have stated about ‘Siha Sitta’, which are in my knowledge. I have not studied Hadith on the line the question has been put to me by the learned counsel for the complainant and I cannot say with certainty that so to whether Mota Imam Malik is included in ‘Siha Sitta’ or not. Volunteers that I have much regard for all sorts of collection of Hadith. It is correct that I have heard the Hadiths put by the learned counsel for the complainant, which are as under:-

Hadith referred by me in my statement are not mentioned in ‘Siha Sitta’. It is correct that ‘Siha Sitta’ are admitted to be correct and valid by all school of thoughts….

R.O. & A.C.

20.7.2000.

21.7.2000. Statement of Mohammad Yousaf Ali,

accused, Recalled on oath

XXXXX By learned counsel for the complainant.

‘Alif, Laam and Meem’ are abbreviative words of Noble Holy Quran. There are fourteen abbreviative words in the Holy Quran. I cannot say without reference that the furteen abbreviations are secret in between Allah Almighty and the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). I do not know if Hazrat Ibn-e-Abbas Razi Allah Tala Ano’ had narrated the meanings of these abbreviations. Volunteers that first of all Holy Quran and Ahle-Bayat are relevant for me to follow but I have much regard and respect of those who follow the Holy Quran and Sunnah. It is correct that in accordance with the Hadith, the Ho’y Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) also said that I left two things, one is Holy Quran and the other is ‘Sunnah’. The message recorded on document Exh.DL is my letter-pad. The word ‘Mohammad’ (Peace Be Upon Him) on the one upper side of document Exh.DL is not seal of the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) but it is the ‘Isme-Mubarik’ (Holy Name) of Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him).

Note: “The above mentioned reply has been given by the accused after some interference by his counsel and they are advised to remain silent while trr; answer is being given by the accused himself who is competent.” …

XXXXX By learned counsel for the complainant.

It is correct that in pages Exh.13, 14, 15, 16 and 17, as mentioned above, it is not mentioned that the Arabic language is not essential to be known by ‘Aulia-e-Karam’. It is my personal affair, so I cannot tell that as to whether I had been receiving the spiritual messages from Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) either in Arabic or in English. It is also my personal affair that as to in which language the ‘Aulia-e-Karam’ conveyed their messages to me, therefore, I cannot tell the language.

Even, I cannot tell the detail of the verification portion ‘M’ to ‘M’ of Exh.DL so far the language is concerned. Similarly, I cannot tell the language in which the message portion “N” to “N” in Exh.DL was received by me. I cannot say that I know English better than other languages. It is correct that the message recorded in the upper portion of document Exh.DL portion “K” to “K” is mine and also of my Committee and I am responsible for it. It is correct that I know the meaning of the word ‘Amplitude’ used in portion “K” to “K” of document Exh.DL. I know the meaning of the word ‘Amplitude’ as ‘Amplitude’. I know the meaning of the word ‘Resurrect’ used in portion “K” to “K” as ‘Resurrect’ in English. I do now know the meaning of ‘Resurrect’ in this way that of raising from the dead and I cannot deny the dictionary meaning. Volunteers that the meaning of this word ‘Resurrect’ in my mind is Verse No. 17 of Surat Yaseen. It is incorrect that neither I know English nor Urdu nor Arabic nor Punjabi. Exh.DL is a manufactured document. It is incorrect to suggest that I manufactured Exh.DL just to grab money from the innocent persons and also from those who have very little knowledge of the religion. It is incorrect to suggest that under the grab of this document Exh.DL. I have extorted millions of rupees from the innocent persons. It is incorrect to suggest that I have extorted money from Mohammad Ali Abubakar, Brig. Dr. Mohammad Aslam, Rana Mohammad Akram, Sajid Munir Dar and others. I never posed to be ‘Imam’ in the past. It is incorrect that I have posed to be ‘Imam-e-Waqt The word ‘Imam’ written in document Exh.DL is not from any side but this word has been bestowed by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). I myself did not declared myself ‘Khalif-e-Azam’. …

… Volunteers that when I delivered the speech in Exh.DN, there was no mention of the prosecution witnesses. I have been made ‘Director General’ of the ‘World Assembly’. I cannot tell the number of Members of this ‘World Assembly’. I cannot tell the details of the Board of the Directors. The manifesto of the World Assembly is given in the document Exh.DN. Volunteers that the World Assembly is the modern name of ‘Silsil-e-Haqeeqat-e-Mohammadia’. It is incorrect that through this World Assembly I am trying to enforce ‘Khalifat-e-Uzma’. Khilafat is alive. It is correct that I wish renaissance of ‘Khalifat-Ala-Minhaj-ul-Nabua (Aman-e-Alam)’. Minhaj-ul-Nabua means to follow the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) in letter and spirit. The Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) established Khilafat on His Minhaj on those days and even now the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) shall establish the same ‘Khailafat’ while I am nothing. It is correct that I have received the ‘Laqab’ of ‘Khalif-e-Azam’. It is correct that ‘Khilafat-e-Rashida’ was also on’Minhajul-Nabua’….

R.O. & A.C.

21.7.2000.

24.7.2000.

Statement of Mohammad Yousaf Ali,

accused Recalled on oath.

XXXXX By the learned counsel for complainant.

… I do not know as to which is the abbreviation of D.N.A., which I have referred in my statement. However, I agree on explaining the meaning of the D.N.A., by the learned counsel for the complainant and it could be ‘Deoxyriovo-Nulic-Acid. I do not remember the name of the Scientists or the group of Scientists, who claim that it has been claimed that Holy Quran has been recorded in D.N.A. Volunteers that I read so in the Internet from USA and I can produce the document in this regard and I also refer Surat Rehman Verses 1, 2 and 3 and Allama Mohammad Iqbal, already explained by me. It is correct that D.N.A, is a Test, as a consequence of which in case of refusal there can be a comparison of blood as it happened in the matter of Sita White and Imran Khan…

Judge’s Discussion and Verdict on The Certificate of Khalifa e Azam

What follows below is the discussion and verdict of the honorable judge on the certificate of Khalifa e Azam produced by Yusuf Ali in court. The honorable judge in his judgement on the Yusuf Kazab case discussed each and every witness and each and every evidence at length in his judgement. It is worthwhile to note here, that in the discussion of the certificate of Khalifa e Azam, the judge states that:

After analyzing this document, I am forced to say that there is no need to examine the prosecution evidence in presence of this original document, which itself is sufficient to declare Yousaf, accused, as ‘KAFIR’ AND ‘MURTAD’

R.O & A.C.

26.7.2000

16. Out of the documents produced by Yousaf, accused, the document Exh.DL is very important for the decision of the case, so the contents of this document are reproduced as under:-

Yusuf Kazab's Certificate of Khalifa e Azam

Yusuf Kazab's Certificate of Khalifa e Azam

BISMILLAH HIR REHMAN NIR RAHIM

MUHAMMAD (P.B.U.H)

He who conquers himself conquers the world. The renewal of the principles of Islam in their fullest amplitude is the first step towards the renaissance of Muslims, for only he who has become resurrected in ‘THE TRUTH’ ‘ALL HAQ’ can resurrect and revive the world arround him.

ALLAH SUBHANAHU WATA’ALA

KHALIFA-E-AZAM

HAZOOR SAYYIDNA

MOHAMMAD SALLAHO ALAHE WAALEHE WASSALAM

K KHALIFA-E-AZAM

HAZRAT IMAM (SHAYKH)

ABU

A.H. MUHEMMED YUSUF ALI

[M]Hum Kamil Tasleem our Tasdeeq K sath Shahadat Detay Hain.[M]

[N]Alhamdolillah, He sees everything as from Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’la, does every thing for Allah’s sake, and attributes nothing to any created being including himself. What he says, he does Compliments or criticism, benefit or loss are same to him. His knowledge is all encompassing and his wisdom supreme. He considers the one who knows and does not apply his knowledge is no better than a donky carrying heavy load of books.[N]

40. About document Exh.DL, which reflects to have ‘Khilafat-e-Uzma’ of Holy.Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) he stated that this document is a Certificate relating to the spiritual aspect awarded to him by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) as the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) awards Spiritual Certificate of this nature. He admitted that in document Exh.DL, the sentence ‘Khalif-e-Azam Hazoor Syed-e-Na>Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) Ka-Khalif-e-Azam Hazrat Imam (Al-Sheikh) Abu A.H. Muhammad Yousaf Ali) is awarded to him by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). Volunteered that in accordance with Surat ‘Haj’ Verse No. 78 every Muslim after all efforts should prove himself as ‘Khalifa’ of Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) subject to His (Peace Be Upon Him) confirmation, added that portion ‘M’ to ‘M’ is the part and parcel of Exh.DL and this ‘Shahadat’ has been awarded to him by Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi and this ‘Shahadat’ has also been given by other ‘Olia-e-Karam, all ‘Olia-e-Karam’ are alive and this ‘Shahadat’ has been awarded by them. Further added that he cannot say that this ‘Shahadat’ has been given by ‘Olia-e-Karam’ at the instance of Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) or not. The portion ‘N’ to ‘N’ is ‘Alhamdulillah’ correct and it is for him; that he knows ‘English’, ‘Urdu’, ‘Punjabi’ and little Arabic and little persian and the language of love. He further stated in cross-examination that he came to know through ‘Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi’ that all ‘Olia-e-Karam have confirmed this Certificate Exh.DL. He stated that he received this Certificate directly from Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) but it was verified indirectly by the ‘Olia-e-Karam’ from ‘Abdullah Shah Ghazi’. Volunteered that this Certificate was spiritual but he cannot tell its details that as to whether he received document Exh.DL, either typed or un-typed and admitted that the document Exh.DL is computerised and typed document and he got this document Exh.DL computersied / typed from Islamabad. He stated that he cannot tell that as to whether he had been receiving the spiritual messages from Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) either in Arabic or in English because it is personal affair that as to in which language ‘Olia-e-Karam’ conveyed their message to him, therefore, he cannot tell the language, even he cannot tell the detail of verification portion ‘M’ to ‘M’ and Exh.DL so far the language is concerned, even he cannot tell the language in which the message portion ‘N’ to ‘N’ Exh.DL was received by him, however, he admitted that the message recorded in the upper portion ‘K’ to ‘K’ of Exh.DL is his and also of his Committee and he was responsible for it and when he was asked about the meaning of word ‘Amplitude’, he stated that the meaning of the word ‘Amplitude’ is ‘Amplitude and about the word ‘Resurrect’, he stated that it is as ‘Resurrect’ in English, however, he denied this suggestion’ that he has manufactured this document to grab money from the people. Now the question worth consideration is that as to what is this document. Leaving aside its admissibility for the reason that this document has been presented by him, so believing it to be admissible the question in my mind is that in view of his above statement, what is the corroborative piece of evidence about this document and what is the sanctity of this document. There is nothing on the record to believe that this document is correct. It is quite astonishing that ‘fluid’ has been used on the word ‘Suaad’ at many places on the name of.-A.H. Muhammad Yousaf Ali’ and if this document is seen by magnified glass, it would look that on every step where ‘Suaad’ has been used for the name of ‘Muhammad Yousaf Ali’, it has been covered by ‘fluid’. So it is quite astonishing that the message of Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) was received by him with the fluid of modern day. Infact this document is ridiculous towards Islam and the spirit of Surat Tauba Verses 65 And 66 of Holy Quran, which in English are as under:-

Verse No. 65

“If you ask them (about this) they declare ‘we were only talkly idly and joking’ say was it at Allah and His Ayat and His Messenger that you were mocking?”

Verse No. 66

“Make no excuse; you disbelieved after you had believed. If We pardon some of your, We will punish others amongst you because they were Mujrimun (disbelievers/sinners/criminals)”.

41. After analyzing this document, I am forced to say that there is no need to examine the prosecution evidence in presence of this original document, which itself is sufficient to declare Yousaf, accused, as ‘KAFIR’ AND ‘MURTAD’. Now thereafter I shall not use the words| ‘Muhammad’ and ‘AH’ alongwith his name in the judgment but only Yousaf Kazzab’.

Final Remarks

Some of you might still be confused that how come claiming to be a Khalifa e Azam is a claim of Prophethood. So I am summarizing the issues, with the claim of Khalifa e Azam.

Yusuf Kazab stated: in cross examination by Ismail Quraishi that:

According to admission in the cross examination by me all the Prophets were appointed as Khalifas i.e. vicegerents of God on earth and the Holy Prophet (PBUH) is Khalifa-i-Azam. chief vicegerent, so by virtue of this certificate, now he is Khalifa-i-Azam on earth. He further admitted in the cross examination that neither one of four Caliphs was holding the high office of Khalifa-i-Azam.

Issue: So basically what Yusuf was saying was that there was only one Khalifa e Azam and it was Prophet Muhammad saaw and now he is Khalifa e Azam, because Prophet Muhammad saaw has himself given him this certificate.

He was stating that:

  • He has the same status as that of Prophet Muhammad saaw as both are Khalifa e Azam – i.e. hold the same rank.
  • He is higher in rank to all other Prophets AS, because all other Prophets AS were just Khalifa and he is Khalifa e Azam. A rank higher then Prophets AS can only be of a Prophet of higher stature.
  • He is higher in rank to Khulafa e Rashideen and all other Sahaba RA. Only Ambiya AS are higher in rank to the Sahaba RA.

Yusuf Kazab stated: that the Certificate was awarded to him directly by the Holy Prophet saaw and that the Holy Prophet saaw awards certificates of such nature.

Issue: This is a direct lie on the character and Zaat of Prophet saaw.

Yusuf Kazab stated: that according to the certificate issued to him by Holy Prophet saaw his knowledge is all encompassing and his wisdom is supreme.

Issue: Now we as muslims believe that Only the knowledge of Allah is all encompassing and only Allah’s wisdom is supreme. This claim of Yusuf Kazab is actually a claim of being Allah. If you go through Yusuf’s Bait e Raza speech you will find out that he says that Allah and Muhammad are one, or simply watch this video.

Further more in cross examination it was found out that Yusuf Kazab didnt know the names of the books of Sihah e Sitta. He didnt know what DNA stands for. According to Yusuf Kazab DNA is the name of a test as a consequence of which in case of refusal there can be a comparison of blood as it happened in the matter of Sita White and Imran Khan.

Additionally, If you read the Certificate of Khalifa e Azam again, you would realize that it has spelling mistakes. In the sentence “for only he who has become resurrected in ‘THE TRUTH’ ‘ALL HAQ’ can resurrect and revive the world arround him” around is spelled as arround. Similarly in the sentence “He considers the one who knows and does not apply his knowledge is no better than a donky carrying heavy load of books” donkey is spelled as donky.

Now regarding Yusuf Kazab’s all encompassing knowledge. Yusuf stated that he does not know Arabic and he does not know if Arabic is the language of Heaven.

Yusuf Kazab failed to answer the question that in which language did the Holy Prophet saaw gave him the certificate, and how did he and Prophet Muhammad saaw communicated since Prophet Muhammad saaw speaked Arabic and he does not know Arabic.

Yusuf Kazab was claiming to be Khalifa e Azam, after Khalifa e Azam Prophet Muhammad saaw. Khalifa e Azam here is just another word for Prophethood. A wine is a wine irrespective of the packaging.

Muhammad vs Muhemmed

Lastly, do see how Yusuf Kazab writes his name in the certificate. Its written as Muhemmed Yusuf Ali.

Yusuf Kazab, Zaid Hamid and all other Kazab followers write the name of our Holy Prophet saaw as Muhammad. But when they have to write the name of Yusuf Kazab, they use the spellings Muhemmed. Whenever they use Muhemmed, they are actually referring to Muhemmed Yusuf Ali and not to our Holy Prophet Muhammad saaw.

Whenever Zaid Hamid gives Shahadah Sayyadi Muhemmed Rasul Allah (saw) is the last prophet, he is actually giving the Shahadah that Sayyadi Muhemmed Yusuf Ali Rasul Allah (saw) is the last prophet.

For more details on this topic, read the article How Yusuf Kazab and Zaid Hamid spell Muhammad saaw.

Sources:

Refutation: Yusuf Kazab Can Not Be Called A Kazab Because He Was Not Punished By A Sharia Court

Zaid Hamid made a statement in his infamous video that “Yusuf can not be called a Kazab”. By playing around with words, Zaid Hamid convinced his young followers that “Yousuf Kazzab may have had wrong beliefs BUT this cannot be said with conviction because there was no Sharia court available in Pakistan, since we do not have a Khilafat. The court that convicted him of blasphemy and hence rendered him a Kazzab was a sessions court following pre-partition British styled procedures. Based on this, Yousuf cannot be called a kazzab and if he did have any wrong beliefs, he is dead and his verdict will be decided by Allah.”

Whenever someone questions Zaid Hamid about his association with Yusuf Kazab, he instantly claims to be a believer in the finality of Prophethood and reminds the questioner that thinking of him to be associated with Yusuf Kazab is equaluivalent to calling him a Kafir. This response actually means that Zaid Hamid thinks that anyone who was associated with Yusuf Kazab is a Kafir.

But then Zaid Hamid also emphasize the point that Yusuf Kazab can not be called a Kazab because Shariah requirements of justice were not fulfilled. By saying so Zaid Hamid ‘apparently’ contradicts himself or cunningly avoids calling Yousuf a Kazab.

Who Is Responsible to Declare a Person Kazab In An Islamic Society

It is the responsibility of an Islamic State to declare a person Kazab and to execute him and all his followers immediately. This is evident from the Sunnah of the Sahaba, who during the caliphate of Hazrat Abu Bakr RA fought a war with Museelma Kazab and killed him and his entire army. In normal battles, Muslim army used to fight only till the war was not won, and after that they used to make the army soldiers, who remained alive, slaves. However, during the battle of Yamama, not a single soldier of Museelma’s army was spared and everyone was killed. For details see the article The Battle Yamama Continues …

However, in the absence of an Islamic State, this responsibility is delegated to Ulema e Ummat and it becomes their responsibility to take into consideration all available evidence and then compare it with the knowledge and beliefs of Islam, and finally declare a person Kazab. The Ulema and Muftiyan e Karam from all Maslak’s evaluated Yusuf’s claims and unanimously declared him to be a Kazab. For details see the article United as One Ummah Against Murtid Yusuf Kazab and His Followers.

Dr Israr in his latest press release has also mentioned the same thing when he says that:

Dr Israr's Second Press Release on Yusuf Kazab Issue

Dr Israr's Second Press Release on Yusuf Kazab Issue

The entire press release is available here.

Conclusion:

  1. To call a person Kazab is the duty and responsibility of an Islamic Shariah State.
  2. In the absence of an Islamic Shariah State its the duty and responsibilities of Ulema e Karam to declare a person as Murtid and Kazab.
  3. Ulema of all Maslak’s declared Yusuf to be a Kazab and Wajib ul Qatal.

If Ulema Could Declare Yusuf To Be Kazab, Why Did They Went to Court ?

In an Islamic Shariah State, the Qazi’s or Judges are Ulema e Karam because in Islamic state all court decisions are taken in accordance with Islam. So in an Islamic state when a Qazi, who is also an alim, declares a person as Kazab, he could also immediately award punishment to that person.

But since Pakistan is not an Islamic Shariah state, the Ulema are not judges in Pakistan. So although Ulema are the authority to declare Yusuf a Kazab, they did not have the authority to award him a punishment. It was due to this reason that Ulema went to court, so that Yusuf Kazab and his followers be punished.

So the Ulema followed the rules and regulations of Pakistan and filed a case against Yusuf Kazab in court, produced all relevant evidences and proved beyond reasonable doubt that Yusuf was a Kazab, even in a court of law. After the due process, Yousuf was also declared worthy of the death penalty even by Pakistani Law.

Conclusion: Yusuf was proved to be a Kazab, even according to Pakistan’s Laws.

Unfortunately Pakistan Is Not A Shariah State

Pakistan is not a Shariah State. This is extremely unfortunate because according to Pakistan’s Laws only a person who commits blasphemy could be executed and not his followers and supporters. This is absolutely against the Shariah principles and the Sunnah of the Sahaba. This is why Moulana Shah Ahmed Norani asked the Judge of the Session Court to not just punish Yusuf Kazab, but also punish all his followers and supporters. Had Pakistan been an Islamic State, Yusuf Kazab and all his followers including Zaid Hamid would have been executed.

Since the Sahaba killed all the followers of Museelma Kazab, the Fitna of Museelma Kazab never got revived again.

May Allah forgive our crimes and help us smash this Fitna once and for all (Ameen).

Maulana AbdulRahman Ashrafi denies Yusuf kazzab was his best friend and calls zaid hamid a lier

Maulana Abdul Rahman Ashrafi denies Yousuf Kazzab - Daily Islam 15 March 2010

Document (Urdu): maulana-abdulrahman-ashrafi-denies-yousuf-kazzab-was-his-best-friend
Source: Daily Islam

p.s. May Allah reward brother Abdullah who referred this to us.

Aalami Majlise Tahafuze Khatam e Nabuwat Gives An OPEN Challenge to Zaid Hamid

To all concerned this is an Open Challenge from Aalami Majlise Tahafuze Khatam e Nabuwat (AMTKN) to Zaid Hamid. The Khatam e Nabuwat organization has offered Zaid Hamid to choose a venue of his own choice for the debate. However, the debate would be OPEN i.e. would be recorded on Camera and any one wishing to view it live should be allowed entry to the Debate Hall.

Aalami Majlise Tahafuze Khatam e Nabuwat will not go to Zaid Hamid’s office and have a hidden and behind closed doors meeting. If Zaid Hamid has nothing to hide and if he is the one standing for THE TRUTH, we challenge him to accept the offer of Aalami Majlise Tahafuze Khatam e Nabuwat.

Refutation of Zaid Hamid’s Announcement of Baraa’at From Yusuf Kazab

Today we received a press release from Tanzeem-i-Islami. We were earlier informed that a delegation of Tanzeem-i-Islami was dispatched to meet Zaid Hamid and ask him to announce his Baraat from Yusuf Kazab and call him a Kazab in public. Some Zaid Hamid fans called it a lie and false reporting, however alhamdolillah our report passed the test of time – as is evident from the recent press release from Tanzeem in which they themselves have mentioned that their delegation met Zaid Hamid.

Zaid Hamid Deceives Everyone Yet Again:

Please note that the delegation of Tanzeem-i-Islami met Zaid Hamid on Friday 5th of March 2010 [as we reported earlier] and asked him to announce his Baraat from Yusuf Kazab publicly on his website and on his Facebook fanpage, this demand is now evident from the press release. Today is 10th of March 2010 and to this date Zaid Hamid did not announced his Baraat either on his website or on his Facebook fanpage.

During the past 5 days he was frantically trying to convince Universities and Conference Halls to not cancel his programs. However, as soon as Tanzeem issued their press release today, he published it on his fanpage by stating that:

Dr. Israr Ahmed’s Tanzeem-e-Islami has released their final statement on Yusuf Ali case and Alhamdolillah we are pleased to note that they have accepted our explanation.

We appreciate their support for the cause of Khilafate Rashida and Riba free economy. We also respect their opinion on our Natioanl Security Strategy policy and our strategy to carry this mission forward. We truly appreciate their sincere and clear stance on these issues.

May Allah (SWT) give us tofeeq to stay on Siraat-e-Mustaqeem and carry forward the mission of RasulAllah (SAW). Here’s a copy of Tanzeem-e-Islami’s press release: http://i43.tinypic.com/s62lpg.jpg

Zaid Hamid Publishes Tanzeem's Press Release on His Fanpage

Zaid Hamid Publishes Tanzeem’s Press Release on His Fanpage

In there press release Tanzeem has demanded him to announce his baraat, they have not demanded him to publish their release on his fanpage. We have confirmed from legal and religious authorities on the matter and they have informed us, that Zaid Hamid has not announced his Baraat – all he has done is publish the demand.

This is similar to situation in which:

Person A asks Person B to read Kalima and Person B then starts telling everyone that He has read Kalima by presenting Person A’s demand. Where has Person B read the Kalima himself, Person B is merely telling everyone what Person A asked of him.

Where has Zaid Hamid announced his Baraat, he is merely telling everyone what Tanzeem demanded of him. It is worth noting here that Tanzeem’s demand is nothing new, this is the exact same demand that AMTKN is making for the past 1.5 years now. See AMTKN’s demand below:

Q: Person A was a follower of Yusuf Kazab, but now he says that he has “nothing to do with Yusuf or his beliefs or any other people like him”. What is the minimum requirement according to Shariah for Person A to come out clear from the mess he was involved in his past?

A: According to Shariah, Person A will have to do the following:

1. Acceptance – Accept publicly and openly that he “did” a mistake by negating the finality of Prophet Muhammad Salalaho Alayhi Wassalam and by following a liar Kazab and a false prophet.
2. Repentance – Repent that what ever he did was indeed a great sin and do Tauba and Astaghfar with Allah Subhanahu Ta’ala.
3. Disassociate – Disassociate publicly and openly that now he is no more a follower of Yusuf Kazab and his beliefs
4. Condemn – Condemn publicly and openly that Yusuf Kazab was indeed a liar and a murtid
5. Tajdeed e Iman – Do tajdeed of Iman (which also includes tajdeed of Aqid e Khatm e Nubuwwat) publicly and openly
6. Tajdeed e Nikah – Do tajdeed of Nikah

Courtesy

Zaid Hamid Yusuf Kazab Video Leak Saga

One gets to think that if Zaid Hamid still hasn’t announced his Baraat, why did he announced Tanzeem’s demand on his on fanpage ?

The answer to this question is very simple. If you have followed the chronology of events in the leakage of his latest video admission of association with Yusuf Kazab you would know that those videos were actually released by Fidaiyaan e Rasool SAW. For reference see this youtube user BullehShah007. BullehShah007 is a dummy id created by an undisclosed person for the sole purpose of leaking these videos – you can see that BullehShah007 never uploaded any video before or after these leaks. If you see the date of upload of those videos, you would realize that BullehShah007 uploaded these videos on Youtube on 28th of Feb, 2010.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Zaid Hamid's Videos Were Leaked By Fidaiyaan e Rasool SAW

Zaid Hamid’s Videos Were Leaked By Fidaiyaan e Rasool SAW

 

However, Zaid Hamid didnt uploaded the same video for as long as March 3, 2010. From Feb 28, 2010 to March 2, 2010 Zaid Hamid tried his best to get these leaked videos off of Youtube. He even threatened some students with bloodshed. However, these lions of Rasool Allah SAW were not be intimidated by the defender of a Kazab.

I want to inform everyone, that our sources knew of these videos since 28th Feb, however, till 1st March these videos were marked as private. So although they were showing up in Youtube search, we were unable to download or view them. It was the night of 1st of March when BullehShah007 turned on the switch and made the videos public. From there onwards started an epic tale of viral marketing. The videos were downloaded by dozens of people and shared frantically across Youtube, Facebook, and Web Forums.

Zaid Hamid and his web brigade soon found out that the videos have been leaked and decided to upload these videos by themselves. This decision resulted in frantic update of status messages on Zaid Hamid’s official fanpage – where by he claimed that he has recorded a video to reveal “The Truth” behind Yusuf Ali case and would release them on 3rd March, 2010. Only problem was that he forgot to mention that the videos have already been leaked and are spreading like wildfire in the cyber space. Such was the state of panic in Zaid Hamid camp, that Zaid Hamid updated his status no less than 7 times in less than 2 hours. The messages are a classic example of extreme deception and propaganda. See snapshot of his status updates below:

Zaid Hamid Preparing His Fans For Videos That Were Already Leaked

Zaid Hamid Preparing His Fans For Videos That Were Already Leaked

The Press Release Publication Saga

Zaid Hamid is an intelligent man, there is no doubt about it – he could be everything but he is definitely not dumb. Zaid Hamid now knows fair well, that an entire army of Fidaiyaan e Rasool SAW has entered the battlefield to counter his lies and uncover his real face. He did not complied to a single demand of the Tanzeem delegation, which met him on 5th of March, 2010. In fact he never admitted this fact that Tanzeem’s delegation has met him. His initial idea might have been to hush up the matter. However, as Tanzeem issued its press release on the matter, he just published the same release on his facebook fanpage with the cunning statements of Alhamdolillah we are pleased to note that they have accepted our explanation.

But Tanzeem actually accepted his explanation on a conditional basis that he announces his Baraat in public. If he doesnt do that, there is no acceptance – since the condition on which Tanzeem accepted his explanation has not been fulfilled.

This behavior is exactly similar with the Video Leak saga, where once the video got leaked – Zaid Hamid released it on his own fanpage by stating that “The Truth” about the Yusuf Ali case has been released. Similarly once the Tanzeem press release got issued, he has published it by saying that “Tanzeem accepted his explanation”.

Lets accept this for the sake of argument that Tanzeem accepted his explanation, but then we are left with even pressing questions:

Deobandi-Barelvi Clash

Zaid Hamid said in his video that Yusuf Kazab case was a problem of Deobandi Barelvi Maslak. We published a refutation of this claim of Zaid Hamid. See our refutation – Refutation: Yusuf Kazzab case was a problem of Deobandi Brelvi maslak? But now if Zaid Hamid is “announcing his baarat from the Aqaid and Believes of Yusuf Ali” is he not siding with the Deobandi’s and triggering a Deobandi-Barelvi clash in the country ?

Molvi’s did not have any proof except Khabrain Akhbar

Zaid Hamid said in his video that Molvi’s who accused Yusuf Kazab of blasphemy did not have any proof except Khabrain Akhbar. We published a refutation of this claim of Zaid Hamid. See our refutation – Refutation: Zaid Hamid claims that the accusers Molvis did not have any proof except Khabrain news. But now if Zaid Hamid is “announcing his baarat from the Aqaid and Believes of Yusuf Ali” Is he not stating that the Molvi’s had sufficient proof against Yusuf Kazab and that Yusuf Kazab was sentenced justly and that the Molvi’s were not Fasadi and Takfiri but Ulema e Haq ?

Dr Israr Is With Me

Zaid Hamid repeatedly stated in his video that Dr Israr is with him. He said that “Dr Israr is very dear to him and Dr Israr holds him very dearly”. He said, “Does Dr Israr not know all this. Pagal hain kia ye sab jo humein support ker rahe hein ?” We published a refutation of this claim of Zaid Hamid. See our refutation – Refutation:Zaid Hamid says repeatedly to satisfy the students that Dr. Israr is with me. But now in their press release Tanzeem has made it clear that Dr Israr considers Yusuf to be a Kazab. Does this not mean that Zaid Hamid was lying with regard to his relationship with Dr Israr falsely accusing Dr Israr of considering Yusuf Kazab a Mard e Momin ?

Zaid Not Involved In Yusuf Last Day Activities

Zaid Hamid has stated in his video, that “He knew Yusuf,  He knew Yusuf very well. He met him in Karachi in 1992”. Later on in the video Zaid Hamid states that then he went to Pindi and hence had no contact with Yusuf Kazab and his claim of Prophethood. But if you listen to the Audio of Bait e Raza, which was recorded in 1997 – during the last days of Yusuf Kazab, Zaid Zaman Hamid is present there. Which means that Zaid Hamid was the first to accept the prophethood of Yusuf Kazab and was even with him in 1997 and was present during his speech at Bait e Raza. Yusuf Kazab himself admits that Zaid Hamid was the first to accept him as a Prophet. In his speech, before inviting Zaid Hamid Yusuf Kazab states “Jab Humein Nayabat e Mustafa SAW ata hoi to hum karachi gai aur sab se pehle wabasta honey wale warafta honey waley sahabi the Zaid Zaman.”

How could Zaid Hamid tell everyone and even the Tanzeem delegation that he knew nothing of Yusuf Kazab’s claim of Prophethood ?

9mm Pistol Challenge

Zaid Hamid stated in his video that he challenges anyone to come to his office and he would prove to them that Yusuf was not a Kazab” and once he proves this he would shoot the Ulema in the head. His exact words were “Choron ga nahi Jhotay Ko Ab Ki Bar Mein..” But now if Zaid Hamid is “announcing his baarat from the Aqaid and Believes of Yusuf Ali” Does this not mean that Zaid Hamid accepted the point of view of the delegation of Tanzeem. In such a scenario, according to the 9mm Pistol Challenge, why didn’t Zaid Hamid shot himself in the head ?

Just Answer this Zaid Hamid: Why didn’t you shoot yourself in the head with your 9mm pistol. After you accepted the point of view of Tanzeem Delegation that Yusuf was a Kazab ?