Refutations: 10 Refutations in respond to Zaid Hamid defense of Yousuf Kazzab

All the refutations that have been made available in the following document has been posted on the blog. We ask Allah to make this beneficial for others and guide them and we ask Allah to reward those who prepared this for the Muslim Ummah in a manner that He loves.

Refutation: Only “Khabrain” reported Yusuf Kazzab Case?
Refutation: Yusuf Kazzab case was a problem of Deobandi Brelvi maslak?
Refutation: Zaid Hamid claims that the accusers Molvis did not have any proof except Khabrain news
Refutation: Zaid Zaman Hamid says that Molana Abdul Sattar supported yusuf kazzab
Refutation: Yusuf Kazzab was the member of Zai ul Haq’s Majlis e Shoora?
Refutation: Ulema threatened Zaid Hamid not to follow the case of yusuf Kazzab?
Refutation: Zaid Hamid says Yusuf was accused of ZANA (adultery) but Molvis could not prove it
Refutation: Zaid Hamid said,”Molvis should come to me to clear it”
Refutation:Zaid Hamid says repeatedly to satisfy the students that Dr. Israr is with me
Refutation: Zaid Hamid says he never met Yusuf Kazzab after 1992 till Yusuf was captured in 1997

Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) said:

“A believer is not stung twice from the same hole”. [Bukhari, Muslim]

Document (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab
Scribd (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab

Source

Refutation: Zaid Zaman Hamid says that Molana Abdul Sattar supported yusuf kazzab

Claim:

The biggest and continuous liar of the 21st century Zaid Zaman Hamid says that Molana Abdul Sattar supported yusuf kazzab and even he was ready to defend him in the court and he presented a “ fatwa that yusuf is innocent”.( as a proof he shown a press release of Molana)

Reply:

Actually Zaid Hamid, during trial of Yusuf Kazzab went to Molana Niazi and shown him some pages written by yusuf kazzab, Molana Niazi said that there is nothing objectionable in those presented articles. Zaid Hamid came out and placed a press released to media that Molana Niazi supported Yusuf Kazzab and according to Molana Niazai ‘Yusuf is innocent’.

But very next day of this news on 10 July 1997 Molana Niazi issued a press release and said that Zaid Zaman shown him a single side of picture and he can never think to support a person who insulted our Prophet SAW.

Here is that press release of Molana Abdul Sattar Niazi


Zaid Hamid said in video that Mufti Ghulam Serwer Qadiri (Brelvi maslak) supported Yuusf Kazzab(He is showing a socalled fatwa from molana Qadiri not to the camera but to the students)

Here is Nawa-e-Waqt news report on Mufti Ghulam Sarwar Qadri about this

After passing above comments some one can say that Molana Qadiri was supporting Yusuf Kazzab?

Since, we are covering all the evidences in the document whose source is below, we are repeating this thread. We have already posted another entry here, refuting the same claim.

Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) said:

“A believer is not stung twice from the same hole”. [Bukhari, Muslim]

Document (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab
Scribd (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab

Source

Refutation: Ulema threatened Zaid Hamid not to follow the case of yusuf Kazzab?

Claim:

Ulema threatened Zaid Hamid not to follow the case of yusuf Kazzab? Zaid hamid telling in his video to his innocent students and blind followers that Molvis threaten me not to follow the case of yusuf kazzab But he (zaid Hamid ) was firm in his belief that yusuf is innocent so he continued to follow the case.

Reply:

There is no proof that zaid hamid was threatened by Majlis ulema instead Molana Ismaeel’s statement is on the
record that Zaid Hamid tried to “Buy” or “threaten” him as he was accuser of the case. Molana stated this in the booklet of Kahtam-e-Nabuwat named “zaid zaman hamid- rehber ke roop mn rahzan” Read this interesting Paragraph below from Molana Ismaeel shuja abadi.

Note:- In which Zaid zaman was also named as SAHABI of Kazzab ( naoozbillah) in the court. Zaid Hamid again lied in video that Molana admitted in court that Yusuf never used word SAHABI for his followers

Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) said:

“A believer is not stung twice from the same hole”. [Bukhari, Muslim]

Document (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab
Scribd (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab

Source

Refutation:Zaid Hamid says repeatedly to satisfy the students that Dr. Israr is with me

Claim: Zaid Hamid says repeatedly to satisfy the students that Dr. Israr is with me, he loves our mission and he also supported Yusuf Kazzab in his case. Reply: Dr. Israr is well known honorable Islamic scholar but we are not able to find a single statement of him to support either for yusuf Kazzab or Zaid Hamid. Molana Niazi’s statement for yusuf kazzab is on the record and he denied it next day, this is also on the record but there is not a single statement of Dr Israr to support yusuf Kazzab. Tanzeem e Islami officials said that Dr. Israr met Zaid Hamid only twice. People are contacting Dr. Israr on this matter and soon his official remarks will appear on his website or in video. We will add his remarks in this page as it appears. But till now we don’t have any proof of zaid hamid’s claim. We are 100% sure that as all of Zaid Hamid’s claims are false and lies, this claim is also a lie and nothing more than it insha Allah. Some of the latest updates as of now regarding Dr. Israr and Tanzeem-i-Islami can be read here and here. Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) said:

“A believer is not stung twice from the same hole”. [Bukhari, Muslim]

Document (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab
Scribd (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab Source

Refutation: Yusuf Kazzab was the member of Zai ul Haq’s Majlis e Shoora?

Claim:
Yusuf Kazzab was the member of Zai ul Haq’s Majlis e Shoora? While praising his “Murshid yusuf Kazzab”, zaid hamid says that Yusuf was so “big scholar” of his time that General Zia appointed him member of his Majlis-e-Shoora.

Reply:

We read one column of those days written by Major Retired Saeed Tawana exposing the reason of his membership of Zia ul Haq Shoora.

Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) said:

“A believer is not stung twice from the same hole”. [Bukhari, Muslim]

Document (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab
Scribd (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab

Source

Refutation: Zaid Hamid claims that the accusers Molvis did not have any proof except Khabrain news

Claim :

Zaid Hamid (Master of History Distortion) claims that the accusers Molvis did not have any proof except Khabrain news. (Below we provide some of the proofs presented in court)

Reply:

The above pages clearly tell that the Khabrain was not only newspaper reporting on this issue so zaid hamid’s this claim also becomes false that the accuser Molana Ismaeel Shuja Abadi did not have any proof except Khabrain news. Some of the evidences which were presented in the court are presented here.

1. Yusuf Kazzab’s audio speech

Yusuf Kazzab’s audio speech ( available on youtube) in which he says himself Muhammad SAW naoozbilah. We will request the readers to please listen this audio again by clicking this link.

Yusuf Kazzab says Sahabi for the present people and Zaid Hamid also speaks in this audio and confirms Yusuf Kazzab’sclaim. (After experts opinion court accepted it as evidence)

2. Yusuf Kazzab’s personal dairy

Yusuf Kazzab’s personal diary in which Yusuf kazzab wrote himself as Muhammad SAW naoozbillah.Here is one
page of his diary

In above page yusuf writes that all the prophets and Nabi were a continual of Muhammad SAW, then All great Sahabis Like Hazrat Abubakar, Umer Usman and Ali (RA) were also continual of Muhammad SAW Then all wali like Abdul QAdir ( jeelani), Mohiyidin, Fareed ud deen ( Gunj Shakar), Mujajad Alf Sani and Muhammad Yusuf Ali ( Himself) are also a continual of Muhammad SAW ( naoozbilah )

In the lower part of page he writes Muhammad SAW always remained in this world and he is also one of his form ( Naoozbillah)

3. Invitation Letter of so-called World Assembly of Muslim Unity

For the conference of his so-called World Assembly of Muslim Unity, Yusuf Kazzab sent an invitation letter to his followers ( was presented in court )

(this invitation was of the same conference in which Yusuf kazzab and Zaid Hamid can be listened in a same audio held on 28 Feb 1997)

Yusuf Kazzab got printed his name only Muhammad on that invitation card and even he put the short sign of (SAW) as we do in URDU.

This was the same session of above invited conference in which Yusuf Kazzab used the words Sahabi for the present people and also invited ZAID Hamid as the first SAHABI.

4. Kazzab’s letters to his followers

Yusuf Kazzab’s letters to his followers in which he claims to be Muhammad and continual of Muhamamd SAW
Naoozbillah were another proof presented in court and the court called experts opinion on the handwriting and it was proved by matching yusuf kazzab’s other documents that the handwriting is same. Here is an example of letter presented in court.

5. Fake Identity Card mentioning Muhammad S/O Ali

Some certificates of school and college were presented in court by which his real name was appearing Yusuf Ali. Later he added Muhammad with his name after retirement and at the end he used only name Muhammad. Even he arranged a fake National Identity card for him which mentioned his name only Muhammad S/O Ali. Copy of that card is below.

6. Statements of Eye Witnesses

zaid hamid claims the only Khabrain news reports were against yusuf Kazzab and Ulema did not have any evidence.. Lets read some statements of eye witnesses presented in court in front of yusuf kazzab (zaid hamid also used to be present in the court as he was following the case) there were total 14 eye witnesses who told the court that yusuf claimed in front of them as Muhammad SAW NaoozBillah.(No witness was the enemy of Yusuf and no one belonged to Molvis) all were ex-followers of Kazzab.


A Little about yusuf Kazzab’s background and personality

Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) said:

“A believer is not stung twice from the same hole”. [Bukhari, Muslim]

Document (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab
Scribd (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab

Source

Refutation: Yusuf Kazzab case was a problem of Deobandi Brelvi maslak?

Claim:

Yusuf Kazzab case was a problem of Deobandi Brelvi maslak?

Zaid Hamid’s second biggest lie is that yusuf kazzab was targeted by Deobandi Molvis because he was a Brelvi and No Alim of other maslaks talked against him.

Reply:

If it was an issue created by Deobandi Molvis against a “Brelvi scholar” then it means any Alim of any other Maslak had not delivered Fatwa or press release against Yusuf? But if we read history of news reports of those days we find every maslak taking against yusuf including Brelvis also.

Lets have a look on a detailed Fatwa report of daily Ummat (not Khabrain, as zaid hamid says khabrain had some “personal issue” with yusuf)

Please pay little attention to the start of the report, as report starts with these words, “Karachi (staff reporter) Daily Ummat and Weekly takbeer………….”

See this Fatwa cum press release shows that Yusuf’s news was not reported in Khabrain till this report that’s why reporter describes only Ummat and Takbeer.

Otherwise he might mention the name of Khabran also… Zaid Hamid says only and only Khabrain reported all of this…

Then read all red boxed names of Ulema and their maslaks…….

Report is continued below


The above report from Daily Ummat ( 19 March 1997) includes the fatwa and press releases of Jamiat Ulema Pakistan (brelvi), Sunni Tehreek (Brelvi) , Jamiat Ishaat toheed o Sunna (Ahle-Hadees) Ahle Sunnat wal jammat, Shiya Muslim Mutahida Mahaz Pakistan (Shiya).

This clearly shows that yusuf kazzab case was not an issue between Brelvi and Deobandi as Zaid Hamid claimed.

If it was an issue against Brelvis then read the statement of Molana shah Ahmad Norani (The Most authentic and Mohtram name of Brelvi Maslak)

Book Fitna Yusuf Kazzab page 84,


Please necessarily read above the remarks of Dr. Ghulam Murtaza Malik Shaheed (a well know Islamic Scholar on that
time)

After all this some one can say that Yusuf Ka Deoobandi Molvis as he was Brelvi? and Zaid Hamid says if he raises this issue again then Deobandi-Barelvi riots may happen.

This is time to say “Ina Lillah he wa inna alia he Rajeoon”

Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) said:

“A believer is not stung twice from the same hole”. [Bukhari, Muslim]

Document (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab
Scribd (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab

Source