Text of Yusuf Kazab's Bait e Raza Speech [Certified Court Copy]

Text of Yusuf Kazab’s Bait e Raza Speech has been made available online by Aalami Majlise Tahafuze Khatam e Nabuwat and can also be viewed on AMTKN website.

Yusuf Kazab admitted in court that the audio cassette contains his voice. Furthermore, Asif Shiraz ex-member of Brasstacks admits that Zaid Hamid has never denied that the audio cassette is fake or that the voice of Zaid Zaman in the audio cassette is not of Zaid Hamid, he only says that the recorder of the cassette should come forward. Asif Shiraz’s exact words are:

So as I saw it from within brasstacks, zaid never really lied to anyone directly. He never said i’m not zaid zaman. he just used the name Zaid Hamid. He never said that the audio is not his: He only said that please bring real owner or recorder of that audio so we can comment on it.

For more details about how Zaid Hamid twists and lies, read Asif Shiraz’s Clarification regarding Zaid Hamid and Yusuf Kazab.

Audio of Bait e Raza Speech

The complete audio of Bait e Raza speech is also embedded below:

Advertisements

Response to Asif Shiraz's Clarification – Stop Playing This Double Game

Aalya Qureshi has responded to the clarification of Asif Shiraz. The following response was written by sister Aalya on the Zaid Hamid Exposition facebook fanpage.

Aalya Qureshi You say // The nature and workings of ZHE group have become more appropriate and befitting for someone who loves to hate zaid hamid…. instead of someone who loves Rasool Allah (sm)//.. I wonder if you’ve heard the Islamic terminology of loving and hating for the sake of Allaah (swt). It’s a valid requirement for emaan. That is why one is required to do ba’raah of individuals who dishonour the rasool (s.a.w) .

Zh has challenged the honour of the nabi (s.a.w.) by supporting Yusuf Kazzab. So yes, we hate ZH, due his belief that Yusuf Kazzab was a “sufi scholar” and ” innocent ” and this may be extended those who support him, by defending and finding excuses for ZH beliefs .

This, my brother is true love for Muhammad ( abundant salaams and blessing of Allaah upon him ) .

I’m glad your enjoying your “tens minutes” of fame. But I pray you reconsider this notion as something special, because it only reflects the love of the Duniyah..You should focus more on The Hereafter thats is going to be our true and final abode !

Your proposal in which you suggested to confront ZH with the ayah from (3:61)

” Then whoever disputes with you concerning him [‘Īsā (Jesus)] after (all this) knowledge that has come to you, [i.e. ‘Īsā (Jesus)] being a slave of Allâh, and having no share in Divinity) say: (O Muhammad SAW) “Come, let us call our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves – then we pray and invoke (sincerely) the Curse of Allâh upon those who lie.”

Do you even know what this ayah is about. I can’t even see how you could bring this up as a comparable to a challenge to ZH’s case. You know its a great sin to speak about Allaah (swt) without knowledge. Be warned and fear Allaah (swt).

So before you confuse others on the matter, and others start following you on this , I think I need to clarify the ayah’s standing .

This ayah , was revealed to the prophet (s.a.w) with regards to a delegation of Christians of Najran (in Yemen) who came to visit him . They challenged and argued with the prophet (s.a.w) about Isa (as) . Claiming that he [ Isa(as) ] was devine and the son of Allaah (swt ) Naudhzubillah .This ayah is a challenge to invoke a curse by way of supplication and is called The Challenge of Mubahalah. The Christians new the implcation of this curse if they accepted the Challenge and therefore backed off before it could be pronounced and inadvertedly denouncing their belief. This supplication is so powerful and carrys heavy implications ,that ONLY a messenger/ Rasul of Allaah (swt) is allowed to invoke it.

So tell us how are the two issues comparable and applicable for this invocation to be invoked in ZH case ? ???. I think you have no idea what the implications are, otherwise you wouldn’t have suggested this !!!! The implcations being the curse would continue throughout the family lineage of those who are being cursed. Future family members who would have no opportunity to make it to Jannah.Do you really wish to apply this curse on ZH’s Kids also and on their children etc

You speak of Zaid’s of taubah, were you witness to it ?…You should have been and its followed the correct methodology as per Shariah rules. Because had you been a witness,then your views of ZH beliefs would be clearer to you today. It would have saved you all the trouble that you are going through now and the issue would have ended there and then.

Tell me Asif, why are you still defending ZH ?…It is clear that he still believes that the Kazzab is a ” sufi scholar ” and that an injustice was done by him .
Why then after all the evidence shown on the xposition site, have you not done ba’raah of this lying deceitful man as yet.

I also suggest you don’t divert the issue from such important facts by throwing conjectures and slander upon us.

Please, also look over your post again and see how your defending, a person who has lied to you also, has gone beyond the rational thoughts in your arguements .

// Zaid took up this stance that even though “lying” is haram, “hiding” the facts is permissible when intentions are good, e.g. Hz. Abu Bakr Siddique (rz) “hid” the fact of the Prophet(sm) accompanying him when a guard asked him that who is with him.//

All this points towards again his warped beliefs.

The truth being, Sydena Abu Bakr (ra) protected/accompanied the rasul (s.a.w) because he , Abu Bakr (ra) believed the Nabi was on the Haqq.

This comparison made only incriminates Zaid Hamid further, because it would imply that ZH believes that Yusuf Kazaab is also on Haqq and as a Sahabi of Yusuf Kazaab he was compelled to also protect his Nabi (s.a.w) Naudhzubillah .

Tell us do you also accept this arguement, for you to justify your defence of ZH on this forum ??…

// He never said that the audio is not his: He only said that please bring real owner or recorder of that audio so we can comment on it.//

Interesting, it looks as if he was going to propogate to people to his own beliefs by convincing them the acceptability of the audio with in the privacy and security of his own office enviroment ? ..It is no wonder he can’t go the Ulema Ikram , they would rip him apart. But for a young impressionable person who has limited knowledge of the deeyn. Well thats easy prey really.

Also by him not denouncing that the voice in the audio not being his, only goes to show that he was to bring forth the warped aqaid at some point or another.

// Similarly, there is no one who can say that zaid lied, in any of his emails. yes, he is guilty of hiding things, guilty of giving “broad” statements which circumvented some pointed questions, but that is not lying, technically speaking.//

Look bro, I really don’t mean to be so harsh but really, hiding the truth is circumvent to lying…Please go back to the Qur’an. There is enough evidence there towards this belief.

// I was aware of the “circumvention” and let it happen, indeed participated in it at times, because I genuinely believed that Zaid had done tauba, and the only reason we are circumventing this issue because it will create needless hindrances in an otherwise well-intentioned good work that we are doing.//

Bro , Hitler and his Ummah believed also that they were doing ” well intentioned good work “, it does not mean they were and that it is acceptable by what Allaah (swt) has allowed …Why , you may ask, because their aqaid and moral compass was wrong and not acceptable in Islaam.

My sincerest thoughts for you and others like yourself well beings, is that you guys have to leave him, truly. He has been exposed by the Will of Allaah (swt) for a purpose. Recognise this blessing which Allaah (swt) has bestowed upon all of us and correct your ways and be grateful to Allaah (swt) for it through your actions. distance yourself. This opportunity may not be there for too long .

ZH is on a destructive path , So please don’t go down with him and take the step of warning others from going along with him ! This is the only redeemable factor left for any true Muslim.

It’s also sad that you have come to attack this exposition page of ZH . The man is a danger to Islaam and to others people who believe in him, and to himself.

i believe the rest of the Yusuf Kazaabs followers haven’t come out in the open and have not gathered a large audience or means to convey their warped beliefs.

The risk with ZH is graeter because it has at stake the eemaan of ZH followers . ZH is just paving the way for other deviant believers to come out of their holes.

He is converting an unacceptable belief into something halaal and he has found and built a platform and access/ means to a large audience and group of defenders ( lashkars ). furthermore he will be able to sustain his cause through other business ventures. This is a very dangerous precedent for an individual to have who will use all these resources to carry forth his warped mission .

Brother, the concrete fact is that ZH doesn’t believe that Yusuf Kazab was wrong / a blaspehemer. Because , as his mureed, it is the highest possibility that he holds the same beliefs of his Murshed ( which were full of batil ) where has incorporated them as part of hisr aqaid. Which is clearly evident today, by ZH not being able to disvowel himself from the kazzab.

ZH has been working hard on taking out the water from the well which contains a dead dog ( the Kazzab ) . The rational and honest solution would have been to take the of stinking rotting dog out instead . If not the water is bound to get polluted

lastly, In your arguements You also seems to forget that ZH wants to bring a Shariah system based on the way of Khilafah Rashideen. Tell us did they promote Muscians as role models towards their cause ?…Or encourage the intermingling of the sexes or even abuse and lie about the people who had Knowledge of The Ilm of Allaah (swt) ??

Anyhow, I shall leave you and Zaid Hamdians with this ayah :

Allaah (swt) says, interpretation of the meaning [2: 208 ].

O you who believe! Enter perfectly in Islâm (by obeying all the rules and regulations of the Islâmic religion) and follow not the footsteps of Shaitân (Satan). Verily! He is to you a plain enemy.

Which means by not entering perfectly into Islaam by obeying all the rules and regulations it ordains, one is following the footsteps of the Shaytaan.

salaam

Revision Received through comment

Asalaamu ‘alaykum wa rahmatullah

Wa Iyaaki

I would like to highlight and clarify some mistakes I have made in my post ..

Firstly , where I have written : ” This comparison made only incriminates Zaid Hamid further, because it would imply that ZH believes that Yusuf Kazaab is also on Haqq and as a Sahabi of Yusuf Kazaab he was compelled to also protect his Nabi (s.a.w) Naudhzubillah .”…

(s.a.w ) was erroneously addded, Astagfirullah…I was referring to Yusuf Kazaab being the Nabi of ZH.

Secondly, With regards to the group of christians who visited the Nabi (s.a.w). Who then went on to refuse the challege, which required invocating the curse in (3:61)…Incase anyone is misguided by my comment where i say ” and inadvertedly denouncing their belief.”, this is not to say that they became Muslims but, instead, to mean that they accepted to pay the Jizyyah . Thereby inadvertedly proving that their conviction and belief in the divinity of Isa (as) and that of him being the son of Allaah ( naudhzubillah ) was actually a weak, doubtful and negatable concept .

I apologise to all and especially to those who i may have misguided in the above two points. may Allaah (swt) forgive me. InshAllaah.

As for the rest of the note, my stand has not changed.

BaraakAllaah Feekum for your kind du’as my brothers and sisters in Islaam , Alhamdulillah , we truly are blessed to be Muslims…. Allaahu Akbar.

May Allaah(swt)guide us all and keep us steadfast on his deeyn. May He forgive and cover our mistakes and may He raise us, in The Herefater, with those He has favored the most. Ameen thumma ameen

Yusuf Kazab's Certificate of Khalifa e Azam Was Actually A Claim Of Prophethood

In his 58 mins leaked video, Zaid Hamid claims that Yusuf Kazab never claimed to be a prophet, all that he claimed was to be a Khalifa – and according to the Holy Quran – every man is a Khalifa. What Zaid Hamid forgets to tell is that Yusuf Kazab didnt claimed to be a Khalifa, but claimed to be a Khalifa e Azam of Prophet Muhammad saaw. As a proof of this claim Yusuf Kazab produced a document in court, which he referred to as Certificate of Khalifa e Azam and claimed that this certificate was directly awarded to him by Prophet Muhammad saaw.

This article is divided into three parts:

  1. Ismail Quraishi’s (lawyer of AMTKN) discussion on the Certificate of Khalifa e Azam produced by Yusuf Kazab in Court.
  2. Yusuf Kazab’s own statements that he gave in court on questions asked by Ismail Quraishi regarding the Certificate of Khalifa e Azam that Yusuf produced in court.
  3. The Discussion and Verdict of the Honorable Judge on the Certificate of Khalifa e Azam produced by Yusuf Kazab in court.

Ismail Quraishi’s Discussion on the Certificate of Khalifa e Azam Produced by Yusuf Kazab in Court

After the court judgement Zaid Hamid wrote an article in Daily DAWN and declared the judgement to be a murder of Justice. Zaid Hamid’s article that appeared in Daily DAWN can be read here. On this, the prosecution party, i.e. AMTKN decided to publish the court judgement in book form so that it becomes a record and anyone could access it and see for himself/herself that Yusuf Kazab was indeed a Kazab and the Court Judgement was not a murder of justice as Zaid Hamid claimed. Ismail Quraishi, the lawyer who fought the case against Yusuf Kazab, wrote a foreword for this book format of the court judgement. The complete foreword could be read in our Article titled The Truth About Yusuf Kazab Blasphemy Case. In his foreword Ismail Quraishi has discussed the Certificate of Khalifa e Azam produced by Yusuf Kazab in court. That discussion is being reproduced below:

He [Yusuf Kazab] has submitted a document which has been exhibited as 111. by the trial court and is also part of this book as Schedule I. About this document he claimed that it was certificate directly soul to him by the Holy Prophet (PBUH) declaring him to be Khalifa-i-Aazam. According to admission in the cross examination by me all the Prophets were appointed as Khalifas i.e. vicegerents of God on earth and the Holy Prophet (PBUH) is Klialila-i-Azam. chief vicegerent, so by virtue of this certificate, now he is Khalifa-i-Azam on earth. He further admitted in the cross examination that neither one of four Caliphs was holding the high office of Khalifa-i-Azam. In an answer to the Question he said this certificate of Khalifa-i-Azam from the Holy Prophet was sent to him by a saint of Karachi, Abdullah Shah Ghazi through the medium of computer on his letter pad. It is interesting to note that the said saint of Karachi had died 300 year ago. In the said certificate which is in English, the convict has been addressed by the Holy Prophet (PBUH) as Khalifa-e-Azam, Hazrat Imam Al-Shcikh Abu A.H. Muhammod Yusuf All. In the said certificate the convict has been declared that his knowledge is all encompassing and his wisdom is supreme. In explanation of this declaration the convict said that he is commentator of Holy Quran. He knows all about Hadees and Fiqh. He is master of Tassawwuf and also knows all the worldly sciences. In order to testify his all encompassing knowledge and wisdom, I cross examined him in regard to his religious knowledge and put questions relating to modern scientific research. I would like to mention here that the convict has stated in the court that he has been receiving all the messages direct from the Holy Prophet (PBUH) either in Arabic or English. I asked him His connotation of Quranic word “Taqwa”, but he was unable to answer. 1 asked him the meaning of “amplitude” and “resurrection”, the words on the top of the certificate of Khalifa-i-Azam, but he miserably failed to tell the simple meanings of these words. He was unable to tell even the names of six authentic books of Hadees (Sihah Sittah), known and respected all over the Muslim world after the Holy Quran. He has no knowledge of a very famous Hadees of Madinatul Ilm in respect of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and Hazrat Ali (RA) despite his claim of being Al-i-Rasool, descendant of the Holy Prophet (PBUH), whereas he is Bhatti by caste according to his school certificate. His name was Yusuf Ali according to school & college certificates and service record (Schedule II), He added “Muhammad” after retirement with malicious design to doge and defraud people for gelling huge amount and property worth millions of rupees by means of deception in the name of the Holy Prophet (PBUH). These facts have been proved by his own admissions and admitted documents. Kindly see the judgment.

Ismail Quraishi further adds in his foreword that …

With this background, the convict Yusuf Ali followed the footsteps of Mirza Ghulam Ahmed and proved himself by oral and documentary evidence that he is true successor in interest of his predecessor impostor. First he approached to the religious quarter as preacher of Islam, then as Mard-e-Kamil, thereafter as Imam-al-Waqt i.e. Mehdi, the next step after Mehdi was declaring himself as Khalifa-i-Azam, We have already given details of soli upgrading. He then claimed himself to be the Holy Prophet (PBUH) before the followers in the basement named as Ghar-i-Hira. Like Ghulam Ahmed Mirza he was also not satisfied with this so called claim therefore finally in order to show himself greater than the last Prophet of Allah (PBUH) he declared that 1400 years back the Holy Prophet was on duty, but in the present times he has attained the perfection and finality of the prophethood by beauty.

Statements Of Muhammad Yusuf Ali Regarding Certificate of Khilafat e Azam

Yusuf Ali gave the following statements in response to various questions asked by Advocate Ismail Quraishi regarding the Certificate of Khilafat e Azam. The statement was recorded in multiple hearings, therefore pieces of the statement have different dates. What follows below are the actual words of Yusuf Ali.

R.O & A.C.

19-07-2000.

19.07.2000. Statement of Mohammad Yousaf Ali,

accused (Recalled on oath)

XXXXX By learned counsel for the complainant.

It is correct that the document Exh.DL is the Certificate relating to the spiritual aspect awarded to me by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) as the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) awards Spiritual Certificate of this nature. It is correct that in the document Exh.DL, the sentence ‘Khalif-e-Azam Hazoor Syed-e-Na-Mohammad (Peace Be Upon Him) Ka-Khalif-e-Azam Hazrat Imam (Al Sheikh) Abu AH-Mohammad Yousaf Ali is the ‘Laqab’ awarded to me by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). Volunteers that in accordance with Surat Hajj Verse No. 78, every Muslim after all efforts should prove himself as ‘Khalifa’ of Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) subject to His confirmation. It is correct that the portion “M” to “M” is the part and parcel of document Exh.DL. This ‘Shahadat’ has been awarded to us by Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi and this Shahadat has also been given by the other Aulia-e-Karam. All Aula-e-Karam are alive and this Shahadat has been awarded by them. I cannot say that this Shahadat has been given by the ‘Aula-e-Karam at the instance of our Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) or not. The Portion “N’ to “N as given in document Exh.DL, is Alhamdulillah correct and it is for me. I know ‘English’, ‘Urdu’, ‘Punjabi’, little ‘Arabic’, little ‘Persian’ and the language of ‘love’. The language of love means the love and affection if awarded to any body by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). It is correct that I am expert in Philosophy, Psychology, Modern Science or in any other subject nor I have learnt these subjects through Books except that I have been tutored by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) and the knowledge like mirror, as referred in page No. 175 of the Book titled ‘Khutbat-e-Nabuwwat (Exh.D/II) compiled by Maulana Mohammad Ismail Shujaabadi, which I mean as under:-

‘Ana-Madinatul-Ilam-Wa-Ali-Babuha, announced by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) is the part of Hadith and it is correct. I have not studied ‘Hi.kmat-ul-Ishraq’ in Philosophy. Volunteers that there is no knowledge of the mirror and that the mirror has only to reflect. It is correct that I had been staying in Europe. I have not heard the name of Averor. The meaning of supreme wisdom, as used in document Exh.DL is that I am nothing. I have not read the Book as ‘Kitabul’ Tawaseen’. It may be correct that just by chance I have referred the said Book in my statement before this court. I do not know Dr. Mycinu. I do not know Hussain-ibne-Mansoor’ exactly but I have heard about him. I have heard that Hussain-Ibne-Mansoor is also known as ‘Hallaj. It is incorrect that he was hanged. Volunteers that his body was cut into pieces and he was killed in the way. I have not dictated for myself as ‘Ahl-e-Bayat’ but I wish so Volunteers that eveyr ‘Muttaqi’ is ‘Ahl-e-Rasool (Peace Be Upon Him). Taqva’ is defined in Surat Baqra Verses No. 3 and 4′. The meaning of ‘Mutaqqi’ is also given of Verses of Surat Baqra, referred by me. There is difference in between ‘Ahle-Rasool (Peace Be Upon Him) and Ahle-e-Bayat-e-Rasool (Peace Be Upon Him). The children of the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) are ‘Aal-e-Mohammad (Peace Be Upon Him) while ‘Aal-e-Rasool (Peace Be Upon Him) means all ‘Mutaqqi’ ctatpH that the Sahaba people. It is means the companion, members can be called as ‘Ahle-e-Bayat. Volunteers that ‘Ahl-e-Bayat Rasool (Peace Be Upon Him) is different terminology and simple ‘Ahl-e-Bayat’ is different. It is correct that my name by birth was ‘Mohammad’ but later on my parents got written the name as ‘Yousaf Ali, in the Admission Form of the School and also in the College. My name as ‘Yousaf Ali Nadeem’ was written in the 9th Class and since it was difficult to have changed the name, therefore, my name as ‘Yousaf AH Nadeem’ was written upto my service record. As soon as I left the service, I got my name corrected as ‘Mohammad Yousaf Ali’. It is correct that my name as ‘Yousaf Ali Nadeem’ used to be written in the College.

The word ‘Nadeem’ was added in my name in 9th Class. My name as ‘Yousaf Ali Nadeem’ has been written in the Matriculation Certificate and simply ‘Yousaf Ali’ was written in the Primary-Certificate. No one can as being the person write ‘Sallaho Alhe-Wassalam’ over the name Mohammad if Mohammad is part of the name of any person. It is correct that in the documents Exh.DL and DM I have written my name as ‘Mohammad Yousaf Ali’.

At this statge, there is a dispute that as to whether any fluid has been used in the document Exh.DL and DM over the name of ‘Mohammad’ to override ‘Sallaho Alhe-Wassalam’ the abbreviation written on the name of ‘Mohammad’, on which the learned defence counsel has shown the original documents in their custody but by the mirror (Magnified Glass) if seen carefully there appears the use of fluid but this dispute shall be resolved later on at the stage of arguments and whatsoever the original documents are, those shall remain with the accused as same have not been produced on the last date.

Upon a request of the learned defense counsel this fact is also brought on record that on the last date the originals of Exh.DL and DM were returned to the learned defence counsel.

(The remaining statement of the accused shall be recorded on the next date).

R.O. & A.C.

19.7.2000.

Statement of Mohammad Yousaf Ali,

accused, (Recalled on oath.

XXXXX By learned consel for the complainant.

Through Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi Rehmatullah-Ale, I came to know that all Aolia-e-Karam have verified this Certificate Exh.DL. Apparently and Physirally Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi has passed away.

The shrine of Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi is in Karachi. I do not know the date or the period with regard to the passing away of Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi. Prior to the information, as mentioned by me, as above, I had no knowledge about ‘Silsila-e-Tasawwuf of Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi as to where he is connected. Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi informed me about the contents of the Certificate Exh.DL indirectly. It was my spiritual experience and I was on receiving end. I received Certificate Exh.DL directly from the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) but it was verified indirectly by the ‘Aolia-e-Karam’ through Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi. Volunteers that this Certificate was received spiritually and I cannot tell the details in this regard. I had received the document Exh.DL spiritually and I cannot tell its detail that as to whether I received document Exh.DL, eitehr typed or un-typed. It is correct that document Exh.DL is computerised/typed document. I had got this document Exh.DL. computerised/typed from Islamabad. It is correct that whatsoever is feeded to the Computer, it may be returned in the shape of a document. It is correct that there may be a change in feeding of the Computer and receiving of the document if some change is caused therein. Definitely the verification (tasdeeq) of Hazrat Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jillani, Imam-e-Aolia would be included in the verification as explained by me. Since I was informed I that its verification is from all Aolia, therefore, the | verification by Hazrat Junaid Bughdadi, Syed-e-Taifa, is also included therein. I am not aware of all Sufic-ordes. ‘ Volunteers that since I had received training directly from the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him), therefore, I have no contact with the ‘Aolia-e-Karam. It is correct that first of all Hazrat Adam Alahe-Salam was bestowed with Khilafat. Volunteers that the Khilafat bestowed to Hazrat Adam Alah-e-Salam bestowed to the Prophets upto Hazrat Issa Alah-e-Salam was Khilafat of Hazoor Mohammad Nabiul Ummi (Peace Be Upon Him). After

the ‘Wisaal’ of the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) the Khilafat went to ‘Khulfa-e-Rashideen’ and first of all to Hazrat Abubakar Siddique Razi Allah Tala Anho. I do not know the details of Khilafat bestowed to Hazrat Abubakar Siddique Razi Allah Tala Anho. I do not know if Hazrat Abubakar Siddique Razi Allah Tala Anho after receiving the Khilafat called himself ‘Khalif-tur-Rasool’. I do not know the details to ‘Khutba’ delivered in the ‘Masjid-e-Nabwi’ by Hazrat Abubakar Siddique Razi Allah Tala Anho….

… I do not know the Writer of document Exh.DL, I know as to who had typed this document (Exh.DL) but I cannot tell his name. It is incorrect that since I do not know the name who typed document Exh.DL, therefore am not telling his name. I have not shown document Exh.DL to –

R.O. & A.C.

20.7.2000

Statement of Mohammad Yousaf Ali,

accused Recalled on oath.

XXXXX By the learned counsel for the complainant.

I know ‘Siha Sitta’ which are six in number. Sahi Bokhari Sharif, Sahi Muslim Sharif, Mota Imam Malik and others, and also Musnad Imam Ahmed Bin Hambal. Abu Dawood and Tirmizi Sharif. I have stated about ‘Siha Sitta’, which are in my knowledge. I have not studied Hadith on the line the question has been put to me by the learned counsel for the complainant and I cannot say with certainty that so to whether Mota Imam Malik is included in ‘Siha Sitta’ or not. Volunteers that I have much regard for all sorts of collection of Hadith. It is correct that I have heard the Hadiths put by the learned counsel for the complainant, which are as under:-

Hadith referred by me in my statement are not mentioned in ‘Siha Sitta’. It is correct that ‘Siha Sitta’ are admitted to be correct and valid by all school of thoughts….

R.O. & A.C.

20.7.2000.

21.7.2000. Statement of Mohammad Yousaf Ali,

accused, Recalled on oath

XXXXX By learned counsel for the complainant.

‘Alif, Laam and Meem’ are abbreviative words of Noble Holy Quran. There are fourteen abbreviative words in the Holy Quran. I cannot say without reference that the furteen abbreviations are secret in between Allah Almighty and the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). I do not know if Hazrat Ibn-e-Abbas Razi Allah Tala Ano’ had narrated the meanings of these abbreviations. Volunteers that first of all Holy Quran and Ahle-Bayat are relevant for me to follow but I have much regard and respect of those who follow the Holy Quran and Sunnah. It is correct that in accordance with the Hadith, the Ho’y Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) also said that I left two things, one is Holy Quran and the other is ‘Sunnah’. The message recorded on document Exh.DL is my letter-pad. The word ‘Mohammad’ (Peace Be Upon Him) on the one upper side of document Exh.DL is not seal of the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) but it is the ‘Isme-Mubarik’ (Holy Name) of Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him).

Note: “The above mentioned reply has been given by the accused after some interference by his counsel and they are advised to remain silent while trr; answer is being given by the accused himself who is competent.” …

XXXXX By learned counsel for the complainant.

It is correct that in pages Exh.13, 14, 15, 16 and 17, as mentioned above, it is not mentioned that the Arabic language is not essential to be known by ‘Aulia-e-Karam’. It is my personal affair, so I cannot tell that as to whether I had been receiving the spiritual messages from Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) either in Arabic or in English. It is also my personal affair that as to in which language the ‘Aulia-e-Karam’ conveyed their messages to me, therefore, I cannot tell the language.

Even, I cannot tell the detail of the verification portion ‘M’ to ‘M’ of Exh.DL so far the language is concerned. Similarly, I cannot tell the language in which the message portion “N” to “N” in Exh.DL was received by me. I cannot say that I know English better than other languages. It is correct that the message recorded in the upper portion of document Exh.DL portion “K” to “K” is mine and also of my Committee and I am responsible for it. It is correct that I know the meaning of the word ‘Amplitude’ used in portion “K” to “K” of document Exh.DL. I know the meaning of the word ‘Amplitude’ as ‘Amplitude’. I know the meaning of the word ‘Resurrect’ used in portion “K” to “K” as ‘Resurrect’ in English. I do now know the meaning of ‘Resurrect’ in this way that of raising from the dead and I cannot deny the dictionary meaning. Volunteers that the meaning of this word ‘Resurrect’ in my mind is Verse No. 17 of Surat Yaseen. It is incorrect that neither I know English nor Urdu nor Arabic nor Punjabi. Exh.DL is a manufactured document. It is incorrect to suggest that I manufactured Exh.DL just to grab money from the innocent persons and also from those who have very little knowledge of the religion. It is incorrect to suggest that under the grab of this document Exh.DL. I have extorted millions of rupees from the innocent persons. It is incorrect to suggest that I have extorted money from Mohammad Ali Abubakar, Brig. Dr. Mohammad Aslam, Rana Mohammad Akram, Sajid Munir Dar and others. I never posed to be ‘Imam’ in the past. It is incorrect that I have posed to be ‘Imam-e-Waqt The word ‘Imam’ written in document Exh.DL is not from any side but this word has been bestowed by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). I myself did not declared myself ‘Khalif-e-Azam’. …

… Volunteers that when I delivered the speech in Exh.DN, there was no mention of the prosecution witnesses. I have been made ‘Director General’ of the ‘World Assembly’. I cannot tell the number of Members of this ‘World Assembly’. I cannot tell the details of the Board of the Directors. The manifesto of the World Assembly is given in the document Exh.DN. Volunteers that the World Assembly is the modern name of ‘Silsil-e-Haqeeqat-e-Mohammadia’. It is incorrect that through this World Assembly I am trying to enforce ‘Khalifat-e-Uzma’. Khilafat is alive. It is correct that I wish renaissance of ‘Khalifat-Ala-Minhaj-ul-Nabua (Aman-e-Alam)’. Minhaj-ul-Nabua means to follow the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) in letter and spirit. The Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) established Khilafat on His Minhaj on those days and even now the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) shall establish the same ‘Khailafat’ while I am nothing. It is correct that I have received the ‘Laqab’ of ‘Khalif-e-Azam’. It is correct that ‘Khilafat-e-Rashida’ was also on’Minhajul-Nabua’….

R.O. & A.C.

21.7.2000.

24.7.2000.

Statement of Mohammad Yousaf Ali,

accused Recalled on oath.

XXXXX By the learned counsel for complainant.

… I do not know as to which is the abbreviation of D.N.A., which I have referred in my statement. However, I agree on explaining the meaning of the D.N.A., by the learned counsel for the complainant and it could be ‘Deoxyriovo-Nulic-Acid. I do not remember the name of the Scientists or the group of Scientists, who claim that it has been claimed that Holy Quran has been recorded in D.N.A. Volunteers that I read so in the Internet from USA and I can produce the document in this regard and I also refer Surat Rehman Verses 1, 2 and 3 and Allama Mohammad Iqbal, already explained by me. It is correct that D.N.A, is a Test, as a consequence of which in case of refusal there can be a comparison of blood as it happened in the matter of Sita White and Imran Khan…

Judge’s Discussion and Verdict on The Certificate of Khalifa e Azam

What follows below is the discussion and verdict of the honorable judge on the certificate of Khalifa e Azam produced by Yusuf Ali in court. The honorable judge in his judgement on the Yusuf Kazab case discussed each and every witness and each and every evidence at length in his judgement. It is worthwhile to note here, that in the discussion of the certificate of Khalifa e Azam, the judge states that:

After analyzing this document, I am forced to say that there is no need to examine the prosecution evidence in presence of this original document, which itself is sufficient to declare Yousaf, accused, as ‘KAFIR’ AND ‘MURTAD’

R.O & A.C.

26.7.2000

16. Out of the documents produced by Yousaf, accused, the document Exh.DL is very important for the decision of the case, so the contents of this document are reproduced as under:-

Yusuf Kazab's Certificate of Khalifa e Azam

Yusuf Kazab's Certificate of Khalifa e Azam

BISMILLAH HIR REHMAN NIR RAHIM

MUHAMMAD (P.B.U.H)

He who conquers himself conquers the world. The renewal of the principles of Islam in their fullest amplitude is the first step towards the renaissance of Muslims, for only he who has become resurrected in ‘THE TRUTH’ ‘ALL HAQ’ can resurrect and revive the world arround him.

ALLAH SUBHANAHU WATA’ALA

KHALIFA-E-AZAM

HAZOOR SAYYIDNA

MOHAMMAD SALLAHO ALAHE WAALEHE WASSALAM

K KHALIFA-E-AZAM

HAZRAT IMAM (SHAYKH)

ABU

A.H. MUHEMMED YUSUF ALI

[M]Hum Kamil Tasleem our Tasdeeq K sath Shahadat Detay Hain.[M]

[N]Alhamdolillah, He sees everything as from Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’la, does every thing for Allah’s sake, and attributes nothing to any created being including himself. What he says, he does Compliments or criticism, benefit or loss are same to him. His knowledge is all encompassing and his wisdom supreme. He considers the one who knows and does not apply his knowledge is no better than a donky carrying heavy load of books.[N]

40. About document Exh.DL, which reflects to have ‘Khilafat-e-Uzma’ of Holy.Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) he stated that this document is a Certificate relating to the spiritual aspect awarded to him by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) as the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) awards Spiritual Certificate of this nature. He admitted that in document Exh.DL, the sentence ‘Khalif-e-Azam Hazoor Syed-e-Na>Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) Ka-Khalif-e-Azam Hazrat Imam (Al-Sheikh) Abu A.H. Muhammad Yousaf Ali) is awarded to him by the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). Volunteered that in accordance with Surat ‘Haj’ Verse No. 78 every Muslim after all efforts should prove himself as ‘Khalifa’ of Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) subject to His (Peace Be Upon Him) confirmation, added that portion ‘M’ to ‘M’ is the part and parcel of Exh.DL and this ‘Shahadat’ has been awarded to him by Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi and this ‘Shahadat’ has also been given by other ‘Olia-e-Karam, all ‘Olia-e-Karam’ are alive and this ‘Shahadat’ has been awarded by them. Further added that he cannot say that this ‘Shahadat’ has been given by ‘Olia-e-Karam’ at the instance of Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) or not. The portion ‘N’ to ‘N’ is ‘Alhamdulillah’ correct and it is for him; that he knows ‘English’, ‘Urdu’, ‘Punjabi’ and little Arabic and little persian and the language of love. He further stated in cross-examination that he came to know through ‘Hazrat Abdullah Shah Ghazi’ that all ‘Olia-e-Karam have confirmed this Certificate Exh.DL. He stated that he received this Certificate directly from Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) but it was verified indirectly by the ‘Olia-e-Karam’ from ‘Abdullah Shah Ghazi’. Volunteered that this Certificate was spiritual but he cannot tell its details that as to whether he received document Exh.DL, either typed or un-typed and admitted that the document Exh.DL is computerised and typed document and he got this document Exh.DL computersied / typed from Islamabad. He stated that he cannot tell that as to whether he had been receiving the spiritual messages from Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) either in Arabic or in English because it is personal affair that as to in which language ‘Olia-e-Karam’ conveyed their message to him, therefore, he cannot tell the language, even he cannot tell the detail of verification portion ‘M’ to ‘M’ and Exh.DL so far the language is concerned, even he cannot tell the language in which the message portion ‘N’ to ‘N’ Exh.DL was received by him, however, he admitted that the message recorded in the upper portion ‘K’ to ‘K’ of Exh.DL is his and also of his Committee and he was responsible for it and when he was asked about the meaning of word ‘Amplitude’, he stated that the meaning of the word ‘Amplitude’ is ‘Amplitude and about the word ‘Resurrect’, he stated that it is as ‘Resurrect’ in English, however, he denied this suggestion’ that he has manufactured this document to grab money from the people. Now the question worth consideration is that as to what is this document. Leaving aside its admissibility for the reason that this document has been presented by him, so believing it to be admissible the question in my mind is that in view of his above statement, what is the corroborative piece of evidence about this document and what is the sanctity of this document. There is nothing on the record to believe that this document is correct. It is quite astonishing that ‘fluid’ has been used on the word ‘Suaad’ at many places on the name of.-A.H. Muhammad Yousaf Ali’ and if this document is seen by magnified glass, it would look that on every step where ‘Suaad’ has been used for the name of ‘Muhammad Yousaf Ali’, it has been covered by ‘fluid’. So it is quite astonishing that the message of Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) was received by him with the fluid of modern day. Infact this document is ridiculous towards Islam and the spirit of Surat Tauba Verses 65 And 66 of Holy Quran, which in English are as under:-

Verse No. 65

“If you ask them (about this) they declare ‘we were only talkly idly and joking’ say was it at Allah and His Ayat and His Messenger that you were mocking?”

Verse No. 66

“Make no excuse; you disbelieved after you had believed. If We pardon some of your, We will punish others amongst you because they were Mujrimun (disbelievers/sinners/criminals)”.

41. After analyzing this document, I am forced to say that there is no need to examine the prosecution evidence in presence of this original document, which itself is sufficient to declare Yousaf, accused, as ‘KAFIR’ AND ‘MURTAD’. Now thereafter I shall not use the words| ‘Muhammad’ and ‘AH’ alongwith his name in the judgment but only Yousaf Kazzab’.

Final Remarks

Some of you might still be confused that how come claiming to be a Khalifa e Azam is a claim of Prophethood. So I am summarizing the issues, with the claim of Khalifa e Azam.

Yusuf Kazab stated: in cross examination by Ismail Quraishi that:

According to admission in the cross examination by me all the Prophets were appointed as Khalifas i.e. vicegerents of God on earth and the Holy Prophet (PBUH) is Khalifa-i-Azam. chief vicegerent, so by virtue of this certificate, now he is Khalifa-i-Azam on earth. He further admitted in the cross examination that neither one of four Caliphs was holding the high office of Khalifa-i-Azam.

Issue: So basically what Yusuf was saying was that there was only one Khalifa e Azam and it was Prophet Muhammad saaw and now he is Khalifa e Azam, because Prophet Muhammad saaw has himself given him this certificate.

He was stating that:

  • He has the same status as that of Prophet Muhammad saaw as both are Khalifa e Azam – i.e. hold the same rank.
  • He is higher in rank to all other Prophets AS, because all other Prophets AS were just Khalifa and he is Khalifa e Azam. A rank higher then Prophets AS can only be of a Prophet of higher stature.
  • He is higher in rank to Khulafa e Rashideen and all other Sahaba RA. Only Ambiya AS are higher in rank to the Sahaba RA.

Yusuf Kazab stated: that the Certificate was awarded to him directly by the Holy Prophet saaw and that the Holy Prophet saaw awards certificates of such nature.

Issue: This is a direct lie on the character and Zaat of Prophet saaw.

Yusuf Kazab stated: that according to the certificate issued to him by Holy Prophet saaw his knowledge is all encompassing and his wisdom is supreme.

Issue: Now we as muslims believe that Only the knowledge of Allah is all encompassing and only Allah’s wisdom is supreme. This claim of Yusuf Kazab is actually a claim of being Allah. If you go through Yusuf’s Bait e Raza speech you will find out that he says that Allah and Muhammad are one, or simply watch this video.

Further more in cross examination it was found out that Yusuf Kazab didnt know the names of the books of Sihah e Sitta. He didnt know what DNA stands for. According to Yusuf Kazab DNA is the name of a test as a consequence of which in case of refusal there can be a comparison of blood as it happened in the matter of Sita White and Imran Khan.

Additionally, If you read the Certificate of Khalifa e Azam again, you would realize that it has spelling mistakes. In the sentence “for only he who has become resurrected in ‘THE TRUTH’ ‘ALL HAQ’ can resurrect and revive the world arround him” around is spelled as arround. Similarly in the sentence “He considers the one who knows and does not apply his knowledge is no better than a donky carrying heavy load of books” donkey is spelled as donky.

Now regarding Yusuf Kazab’s all encompassing knowledge. Yusuf stated that he does not know Arabic and he does not know if Arabic is the language of Heaven.

Yusuf Kazab failed to answer the question that in which language did the Holy Prophet saaw gave him the certificate, and how did he and Prophet Muhammad saaw communicated since Prophet Muhammad saaw speaked Arabic and he does not know Arabic.

Yusuf Kazab was claiming to be Khalifa e Azam, after Khalifa e Azam Prophet Muhammad saaw. Khalifa e Azam here is just another word for Prophethood. A wine is a wine irrespective of the packaging.

Muhammad vs Muhemmed

Lastly, do see how Yusuf Kazab writes his name in the certificate. Its written as Muhemmed Yusuf Ali.

Yusuf Kazab, Zaid Hamid and all other Kazab followers write the name of our Holy Prophet saaw as Muhammad. But when they have to write the name of Yusuf Kazab, they use the spellings Muhemmed. Whenever they use Muhemmed, they are actually referring to Muhemmed Yusuf Ali and not to our Holy Prophet Muhammad saaw.

Whenever Zaid Hamid gives Shahadah Sayyadi Muhemmed Rasul Allah (saw) is the last prophet, he is actually giving the Shahadah that Sayyadi Muhemmed Yusuf Ali Rasul Allah (saw) is the last prophet.

For more details on this topic, read the article How Yusuf Kazab and Zaid Hamid spell Muhammad saaw.

Sources:

Yusuf Kazab's Ad in Jang March 1997 and Ulema's Response To It

In his leaked videos Zaid Hamid claimed that Yusuf Kazab published ads from his own pocket in different news papers to clarify his believes, but even then Moulvi’s didn’t accepted his clarification and ultimately got him convicted in court.

Yusuf published ads in Daily Jang and Daily Nawa i Waqt to clarify his believes. Yusuf also tried to publish ads in Daily Khabrein, but Khabrein refused to publish his ads – even when he offered hefty sums to Daily Khabrein. The muslim community and Ulema strongly criticized Daily Jang and Daily Nawa i Waqt for publishing Yusuf’s ads saying that they dont publish news related to Yusuf, but publish his ads – because the ads were well paid.

Yusuf’s ads in Jang and Nawa i Waqt were published on the front pages and were paid off by a mureed of Yusuf Kazab, who sold his property to pay for the ads. This mureed of Yusuf went into depression after the court judgement on realizing that he has lost all of his wealth and his iman by following and supporting Yusuf.

English Translation of Yusuf’s Ad in Daily Jang

I Abul Hasnain Muhammad Yusuf Ali clarifies that I am a firm believer in Khatam e Nabuwat.

There is no God But Allah and Muhammad (PBUH) is the messenger of Allah

I have never claimed to be a prophet and nor can I even think of it. There will be no prophet after Hazoor Nabi e Akram saaw. I consider a person who claims to be a prophet and a person who accuses someone to be a prophet are mardood.

Yusuf’s Ad in Daily Jang

The ad can be viewed in full screen mode by clicking here.

Yusuf Kazab Ad in Daily Jang 26 March 1997

Yusuf Kazab Ad in Daily Jang 26 March 1997

English Translation of Ulema’s Response in Daily Ummat

1 – Yesterday Maloon Yusuf Ali published an ad in Daily Jang and in which he stated that he believes in Khatam e Nabuwat and in the finality of Prophet Muhammad saaw and that he does not believe in any Prophet after Muhammad saaw and that he has not claimed to be a new prophet.

2 – This clarification of Maloon is not relevant to the actual issue. Maloon is being accused that he calls himself to be Muhammad saaw and presents himself as Muhammad saaw to his followers. Therefore, by claiming to be Muhammad saaw, he does not have to additionally claim to be a prophet. Furthermore, in order to justify his black deeds he claims that its not him but rather the spirit/nur of Prophet Muhammad saaw within his body that is doing all this. In this way, he absolves himself of all crimes and lays the blame on the sacred name of Prophet Muhammad saaw.

3 – This clarification of Maloon is a deep and clever scheme and it proves that Maloon has not left his previous Aqaids/believes and has instead taken the cover of this ad to hide his aqaids.

4 – All muslims are requested to not fall for this scheme and not allow Maloon to divert from the real issue of Impersonating of Muhammad saaw.

5 – We inform the Government that if an action is not taken against Maloon, it will result in a strong reaction – whose responsibility will be on the Government itself.

Ulema’s Response in Daily Ummat

The ad can be viewed in full screen mode by clicking here.

AMTKN Ad In Response To Yusuf Daily Ummat March 30 1997

AMTKN Ad In Response To Yusuf Daily Ummat March 30 1997

Important Note

After viewing Yusuf’s ad and Ulema’s response to the ad, the readers will understand that Zaid Hamid is issuing clarifications that are deceiving and veiled similar to his prophet Yusuf Kazab.

Clarification by Asif Shiraz Regarding His Comments About Yusuf Kazab and Zaid Hamid

Editor’s Note: Asif Shiraz has left a detailed comment on our article Is Asif Shiraz really an ex-member Brasstacks ?. The comment was posted on Zaid Hamid Exposition facebook fanpage and can be viewed here. The clarification is being published in verbatim here.

Asif Shiraz Salam Guys…

The nature and workings of ZHE group have become more appropriate and befitting for someone who loves to hate zaid hamid…. instead of someone who loves Rasool Allah (sm)…

First of all, I would like to thank everyone for making me so popular. I never knew taking my video off the internet would make me even more popular than putting it on 🙂 lol…

Let me tell you some hard facts, which some of you will probably dislike a lot.. (because again… muawiya ki nafrat ali ke muhabbat se barh gayee hai).

Let me at first start by proposing a solution to this whole thing, before saying anything further. The solution is verse 3:61. Challenge zaid hamid according to this verse.. doodh ka doodh aur paani ka paani hoe jai ga.

Now, about me and my *Video* 🙂

When zaid started brasstacks, I joined him whole heartedly because to me, it was an attempt to genuinely serve pakistan. I knew he had done tauba for yousaf issue back around 2000 even while yusuf was alive, so I was satisfied he is not trying to bring out yousaf ideology or anything. Besides, the *real* followers of yousaf kazzab are still running loose and just because they don’t come on TV, and just because challenging them isn’t a high profile thing to do, so our fidayeen-e-rasool of this group probably felt more excited trying to focus on zaid. Anyway.. coming back to point… so when I joined brasstacks, Zaid took up this stance that even though “lying” is haram, “hiding” the facts is permissible when intentions are good, e.g. Hz. Abu Bakr Siddique (rz) “hid” the fact of the Prophet(sm) accompanying him when a guard asked him that who is with him.

So as I saw it from within brasstacks, zaid never really lied to anyone directly. He never said i’m not zaid zaman. he just used the name Zaid Hamid. He never said that the audio is not his: He only said that please bring real owner or recorder of that audio so we can comment on it. Similarly, there is no one who can say that zaid lied, in any of his emails. yes, he is guilty of hiding things, guilty of giving “broad” statements which circumvented some pointed questions, but that is not lying, technically speaking. I was aware of the “circumvention” and let it happen, indeed participated in it at times, because I genuinely believed that Zaid had done tauba, and the only reason we are circumventing this issue because it will create needless hindrances in an otherwise well-intentioned good work that we are doing.

Zaid is good at words in this sense. Even in his 58 minute released video, at one point he said “I came to rawalpindi in 1992 and never knew what was happening in karachi”. Some people undertook this statement to mean that he is saying he never “met” yousaf after 1992, but technically, that is not what he said. All he said was, I didn’t know everything that happened in karachi.

I’m not a fan myself of this kind of double talk, nor am I defending why he does this. All I am saying is, he never directly lied. Now, why did he do this?

Like I said, my impression was that he wants to do something good, and is afraid that his past will catch up with him, and no one will believe he has done tauba. That is why I continued silence over such deception, while privately exhorting him to come out clearly in the open.

However, I also am personally a witness to the fact that zaid hamid left kazzab yousaf even while yousaf was alive. We prayed in the same mosque in chaklala and I knew what was happening in his life. This is a hard and bitter pill for those to swallow who are extremely keen on presenting zaid has yousaf’s minion, but the fact is, zaid is himself on “BITTER” terms with the actual followers of yousaf kazzab. Zaid hamix exposition guys know this. But they will never tell you this. They know that zaid does not even talk to yousaf’s followers. But they neither go against yousaf’s real followers, nor do they highlight this fact, because they want to “sell” this impression that zaid is trying to bring back and revive yousaf’s ideology.

The truth is, it always remains a possibility that zaid is simply being egotistical of his personal sincerity even while being misguided by yousauf, and inspite of having realized it privately, does not want to say it in public. The other possibility, that the whole brasstacks is a farce and zaid has realy been working on a covert agenda to re-establish yousaf as a nabi, is based on one single, solitary fact: Zaid not callimg him a kazzab. other than that, there is still absolutely no concrete evidence that can establish how zaid is involved in trying to promote yousaf’s ideology.

Zaid hamid exposition site is doing a wonderful job exposing yousaf kazzab. But a very poor job in trying to go to all lengths and all extremes to paint zaid negatively, as much as possible. So much so that they didn’t even leave me. 🙂

I ask them just one question. Kazzab toe kazzab theher gaya. Now where is the fatwa which says that kazzab yousaf koe kazzab na kehna wala bhi kazzab hai?

And lastly, I’m sure something that you will apply on me, kazzab yousaf koe kazzab na kehnay walay koe bhi kazzab na kehlay wala bhi kazzab hai 🙂 (Iss last pool mein yeh loag mujhe daalain ge 🙂

Editor’s Note: If I would have to summarize the clarification in one sentence, I would say that Asif Shiraz is trying to explain that telling a lie is a bad thing, but hiding truth is permissible in Islam. So Zaid Hamid and I myself never told a lie, all we were doing was hiding the truth in veiled and beautiful words.

Asif Shiraz's Clarification

Asif Shiraz's Clarification

Muhammad Assad ex-member PKKH: 'PKKH belongs to BT, Get that straight'

We conducted an interview with Muhammad Assad, an ex-member of PKKH. The interview is being published here in verbatim.

What was your role at PKKH and Why did you left PKKH ?

I worked for PKKH as Communication head. I was the admin of the PKKH Discussion Forums. I separated around 9 months back along with one of the PKKH founder over differences on the Pak Army operation. Later I rejoined PKKH in few weeks to assume my responsibilities as PKKH Communication Head until last month.

I also met ZH on PKKH Special protocol on his visit to Saudi Arabia.

You can see my profile on PKKH Forum here. I was responsible to set up , manage and market the forum.

Profile name: acid.

What is PKKH and what are its Goals and Objectives ?

On the papers , PKKH goals and objectives are as stated on their website i.e raise awareness of Pakistani real politics and corrupt ideologies and external influence on Pakistan etc. All these are just stated goals and objectives and used as a public relation exercise.

However , the true goal of PKKH is not a word different than of BrassTacks. That is to carry on Zaid Hamid’s agenda under different names and covers.

What is the Funding model of PKKH ?

I am not aware how exactly is PKKH funded but all expenses are paid by Dan Qayyum who himself is part of another organization which you will see in my answer to the following questions.

Are there any paid employees. If yes what are there pay scales ?

No paid employees in PKKH Team. This is what is APPARENT. Since PKKH itself is a wing of other sister organizations , I am not aware If key employees are paid or unpaid.

What is Zaid Hamid’s role in PKKH. What influence he has on PKKH. Is PKKH really independent of Brasstacks as Dan Qayyum suggests it is ?

Zaid Hamid is effectively the director of PKKH and possess the influence of the director. PKKH is not an independent organization as has been suggested. It runs closely in affiliation with BrassTacks. There are a number of BrassTacks members who are also in PKKH Team , for example , Zaki Khalid , Who holds position in BrassTacks and is also head of Media dept. for PKKH.

There has been meetings between BrassTack members and PKKH members in UAE around mid of 2009.

What is your assessment of Zaid Hamid as a person and as a security analyst ?

Zaid Hamid is a masked guy. He used his communication skill to impress the masses into believing his agendas. From my research, Zaid Hamid spends lot of time in digging information from google and present into his Urdu programs. Take ‘Economic Terrorism’ for example which is just the Urdu version of Zeitgeist documentary. Since our Pakistan people, unfortunately, are unaware and ignorant of such facts, they got really impressed by what Zaid Hamid had to say (they dont know that all he is doing is google search).

Initially Zaid Haimd focused his programs into wider issues e.g. the economic system and CIA threats. He developed reputation and credibility from these ‘external focused’ programs which were mostly appropriate content wise.

After scoring on his initial programs, he shifted his focus deeply into the Pakistan politics. This is the point where he started to infiltrate his ideologies into his so called analysis. The Pakistan population got trapped here and started to follow and believe his analysis as they believed his initial programs. He provides anti India and Isareli analysis which is easy to believe for the Pakistani masses.

I believe Zaid Hamid analysis is nothing but just myths and tales in the name of Pakistan which aim to play with emotionally distressed Pakistani citizens. As far as Zaid Hamid as person, than I think there is enough for it on your website.

Anything else that you feel is worth sharing.

Dan Qayyum belongs to Zaid Hamid. PKKH belongs to BT. Get that straight. Do not let different covers deceive you. ZH has managed to team up the rich spoilt kids, who are ‘immature’ in his own words. But his success would be short lived because one day these immature will get mature too.

He do believe that he is right thats why he is being successful. Success has deceived him. Even the Kufar is now days the most successful nation but there end would be an evil abode.

Best Regards,
Assad

TV1 Stops Airing Brasstacks – Zaid Hamid Fighting Back

Brasstacks, Zaid Hamid’s TV show was used to be aired by TV1. However, this week TV1 did not air the show. This has been a result of immense pressure being applied on TV1 and specially the founder and owner of TV1 Tahir A Khan by Fidaiyeen e Rasool saaw.

The last episode of Brasstacks was aired on TV1 on Sunday 21st March. ZHE launched a massive mobilization campaign and asked its fans to sms Tahir A Khan, inform him about Zaid Hamid’s association with Yusuf Kazab and request him to stop airing Brasstacks and ban Zaid Hamid from appearing on TV1. The campaign was launched on Thursday 25th March, 2010.

Tahir A Khan Message Campaign by ZHE

Tahir A Khan Message Campaign by ZHE

We have confirmed from various sources and they have informed us that Tahir A Khan has decided to shut down Brasstacks, however he has now been put under pressure from Zaid Hamid and his cohorts to re-instate the program. One reader of Zaid Hamid Exposition blog has informed us that Zaid Hamid and his team take the mobile number of all the students participating in their seminars. These students are then messaged from time to time to write letter to editors of newspapers to give coverage to Zaid Hamid. However, they have now received an sms from Zaid Hamid and TeamBT to immediately sms Tahir A Khan and ask him to continue running Brasstacks on TV1.

Asma: I was also present at the Islamabad convention center when they beat up a student, went with friends who were fans of Zaid Hamid. Stupidly, we have our phone numbers, they would message us to write letters to the editors, and now they have sent us the following sms:

dear family members our opponents r forcing tahir khan to end brasstracks n pressurising him to air n0thng related to ’syed zaid zaman hamid in future. 0333-2196777ths is tahir a khan’s number flood his inbox with msgs in support of zaid hamid n safe the mission of takmeel e Pakistan n that this mission can not be stopped play ur role

We want to inform TV1, its management and specially Tahir A Khan Sahib that Zaid Hamid is the defender of a Kazab. This has been obvious now after Zaid Hamid’s own admission. Any support or provisioning of Air Time to him would be against Islam and against Pakistan – which was founded on the name of Islam.

ARY, the other channel, that was an official media sponsor of Zaid Hamid’s Wake Up Pakistan project and his Takmeel project backed off from providing air time to Zaid Hamid after the Shahadat of Moulana Saeed Ahmed Jalalpuri.

TV1 was now the only media channel that was airing Zaid Hamid’s programs and providing him air time. We have nothing but respect for Media channels and we are a strong believer in freedom of speech. However, we will not tolerate the Defender of a Kazab and Gustakh e Rasool to go on air freely.

We request the administration of TV1 and specially Mr Tahir A Khan to not budge and fulfill his Islamic duty by banning Zaid Hamid and Brasstacks. Mr Tahir A Khan should not be seen standing besides Zaid Hamid, when his own team PKKH and his old friends such as Ahmed Quraishi has left him on this issue.

Our struggle is extremely peaceful but we would make no distinction between the defender of a Kazab [Zaid Hamid] and the promoters of this defender [TV1].