The Case Against Zaid Hamid

Zaid Hamid Admits Links to Yusuf Kazzab and Defends Him

Refutation of  58 mins Pack of Lies

Refutation of Zaid Hamid’s Lies by Alami Majlis e Tahafuz e Khatam e Nabuwwat (AMTKN)

Yusuf Kazab Blasphemy Case

Audio of Yusuf Kazab

Books and Articles on Yusuf Kazab

Yusuf Kazab and Sex

Eye Witness Account on Yusuf Kazab’s Claim of Prophethood

Ulema e Karam On Yusuf Kazab and Zaid Hamid

Zaid Hamid Past and Present

Zaid Hamid Newspaper Coverage

34 comments on “The Case Against Zaid Hamid

  1. Abeer says:

    I don’t wanna argue on the so called “pack of lies” because the video has clear evidence of what Zaid Hamid’s intentions are

    Zaid Hamid has been clear in that if it had been proven that Yousuf Ali (Na-Uzbillah) had claimed prophet-hood than He would be the first to chop his head off. So still you blame him instead of sitting together and talk it off on a table with a cup of tea? like a gentleman

    My question is that Why Yousuf Ali was killed if the court had given a decision against him? Who wanted him dead? And What were they afraid of?

    Anyhow Zaid Hamid is not against just Yousuf Ali’s case alone, but He is against the injustice practice of law in courts.

    Thank you and I appreciate your work

    Regards,

    Abeer

  2. Abu Muhammad says:

    @ Abeer

    When you call it ‘pack of lies’, would you mind providing your evidence? Or is it that you just want to leave fancy written comments on the blog?

    The Ulama have already invited Zaid Hamid to go to them and clear his case, Why is he reluctant to go to them and solve this once and for all?

    When Zaid Hamid says that if it had been proved that Yousuf Kazzab claimed prophet-hood, he’d first chop off his head – then he is right when he says this because according to the belief of Yousaf Kazzab, Prophethood is not nullified if you claim that the Noor of Muhammad (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) has been entered in Yousuf Kazzb Mal’oon body. For that you need to understand the Aqeedah of this Kazzab before you make hasty decisions. Just like Musailmah Kazzab didn’t said he is a Prophet DIRECTLY, rather he said he is a partner in Muhammad (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) Prophethood.

    Expand your knowledge of Deen first, and then try to deduce anything. Otherwise, you’ll be left in the camp of Kazzab and Kazzab don’t do good to the faith of Muslims.

    Not only Zaid Hamid, but the whole People of Pakistan (besides the rulers) are against any injustices, so where does Zaid Hamid claim is different? I don’t understand this absurd comment.

    Don’t worry about it if your not understanding it. There are some ears that are deaf, some eyes that are blind and some hearts that are sealed.

    For us is ONLY to convey. On the day of judgement, Allah (ta’alah) will not ask me, WHY Abeer didn’t got convinced, but I’ll be asked, whether I conveyed or not. Do you understand this ?

    Alhamdulillah, with the grace of Allah and His Help, we are moving forward.

  3. yasir says:

    Every time my heart pray for you for your efforts and exposing this lawrence of Arabia.

  4. Abeer says:

    I think you missed my point completely!

    Do you have anything on Zaid Hamid? well let me tell you , you don’t! and you will never have anything, so stop accusing him of his relation with Yousuf. He has already said that in a Sharai Adalat he will defend Yousuf Ali, where is the Sharai Adalat?

    Furthermore, Relations are not held for accountability.

    For example: I’m not accountable for my father’s sins neither is he for mine, except for that he will be judged regarding his responsibilities as a father, and I with mine a son.

    Again let me repeat my main point so that you don’t miss it again, There is no case against Zaid Hamid!

    You cannot held anyone accountable on the basis of a relation. Its clear that Zaid Hamid doesn’t accept any one Nabi after Mohammad S.A.W.W. Alhamdulillah like all of us.

    I hope I’ve been clear in my words and understanding of the critical nature of the issue.

    Regards

    Abeer

  5. Abu Muhammad says:

    @ Abeer

    If I summarize your points, you tried to say following

    1) Since there is no Sharai Adalat, we should let loose anyone who claims to be False Prophet or is on the beliefs of False Prophet, and should leave such Mulhid to do whatever he likes because of lack of Shariat and Shariat Adalat. Let me say this, what an absurd argument. I won’t be surprised, if you start defending now even Qadyanis, as at that time, they were called Kafir, there was also no Shariat Law or Shariat’ Adalat in Pakistan. I’m sorry for us, this is not most possible. We can’t wait for your ‘Khilafah’ to come and so-called ‘Shari’at Courts’ be established, which will be on the Fiqh of Yousuf Kazzab, to decide this serious matter.

    2) If you’re a follower of False Prophet – the relations are definitely taken into account. Where did you learn this twisted FIQH?

    3) What you describe being a relation is correct, but this is out of context for this scenario. If we were making this judgement based on this relationship as you define – then from that ALL THOSE PEOPLE WHO WERE IN RELATION WITH YOUSUF KAZZAB – would be termed Mulhid. I’m sorry to say, this is not the case, and this is another absurd way to defend.

    4) Okay, let’s accept for the sake of argument, that there is no case against Zaid Hamid. But there is case with Yousuf Kazzab at least – do you consider him Kazzab – or is it that the love Zaid Hamid means more to you than the Prophet (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam)

    Hope this clears many points that you’re taking vaguely and non-seriously without insight.

  6. Abeer says:

    for point 2. As Zaid Hamid has cleared it in his video, he will never accept any false prophet.

    for point 1. There is no such thing is my khilafa or your khilafa, theres only one khilafa and that is of sharia.

    for point 3. I agree with you but since neither I follow him or Zaid Hamid does so this falsely accused relation doesn’t apply, secondly a lawyer defends a criminal in the court without being related to his crimes doesn’t he?.

    for point 4. I will refer to your quote about the “Nur of Muhammad P.B.U.H entering Yousuf” He may have related Nur with “knowledge and wisdom of Muhammad P.B.U.H”, as we say that the nur of Qur’an enter us, or the light of Qur’an guide us, also refer http://supplications-duaas.tripod.com/id92.html

    Finally, lets come to a common agreement!

    I’m not here to defend any false prophet, and I’m sure no one will.

    We are currently working on takmeel-e-pakistan project based on the ideology of Allama-e-Iqbal and Quaid-e-Azam and on the foundations of Qur’an and Sunnah.

    As far as the Yousuf’s story is concerned let Allah judge between us since neither Yousuf is alive nor his fitna so again theres no reason to argue any further on that.

    Regards,

    Abeer

  7. Abeer says:

    May Allah guide us both!

  8. hesham syed says:

    First of all, is Zaid claim right or is he competent to say that the court gave a wrong decision? Zaid need to challenge this or fight against the court decision in the court itself – With all the concrete evidences provided the Judges were competent enough to pass judgment about Yusuf hanging to death.

    Gustakhey Rasool ( saw ) does not only mean that some one declares himself as any new Prophet , even worse is that some one impersonate Rasool ( saw ) and pretend to have acquired the same status as Muhammed ( saw ) – This is what Yusuf did and in this garb he pursued his lustful plans or desires and looted + caused distress to many families financially as well as mentally. Many are still in mental trauma after they came out of his spell and carrying a deep sense of guilt to what they have been involved with – They are under treatment and in the process of recovery to get back their identity and confidence.

    Secondly, all Muslims should make no mistake that any sympathy or support to Gustakhey Rasool ( saw ) is like being in the same Cult or Tribe – This depicts as if Rasool ( saw ) is less important than such Charlie – hence Zaid stand on this issue is most shocking even to some of his fans and well wishers.

    Zaid is just playing with words and has been fooling around. People are ready to forget his past association with Yusuf but his devotion still with Yusuf is what is making every one cautious of him.

  9. Abu Muhammad says:

    @ Abeer

    1. Failed to answer the point mentioned, but hurriedly decided to just mention a twisted statement regarding Khilafah, as if my other point was not valid still.

    2. How do you know Zaid Hamid doesn’t follow him and is not on his beliefs? If he is not, then let him call Yousuf as Kazzab and and we’d believe that his claim is correct.

    3. Accepting your argument that the defense lawyer defends without being related to crimes. Then why not Zaid Hamid is not agreeing to the court judgment and not calling him Kazzab? What room has been left for Zaid Hamid to defend this false prophet legacy?

    4. You seem to know too much about the beliefs of Yousaf Kazzab? Were you his defense lawyer or what? Seems like you haven’t gone through the witnesses statement that is why you are confused. All the witnesses gave testimony that Yousaf Kazzab said “I’m Mohammad” and his dairy testifies to the beliefs he held regarding the transfer of Noor of Prophet (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) from Adam (Alais Salam) to whichever will come later (Naozubillah). It is better to study the case properly before you speak in defense

    5. If you are not here to defend any false Prophet, then why are you giving justifications for Yousuf Kazzab – as to what he meant by what he was saying? Is this another way to fool others with confused statements and Why can’t I see you writing Yousuf Kazzab (Is it again because according to you also – Shari evidences have not been fulfilled?)

    6. Allah will judge him for sure, but as Muslims , we also are supposed to judge by APPARENT. Do you say the same for the False Prophets of Qadyanis and Gohar Shahis – that let Allah judge them? Are you joking?

    Our agreement is on the following. Please note it down.

    We are currently working on Takmeel-e-Islaam ( Shari’ah) based upon the ideology of Islam, The Companions of the Prophet (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) on the foundation of Quran and Sunnah. Make no mistake, to confront us with your IDOL OF NATIONALISM – because without a doubt it is the promise of Allah that he’ll make His Deen dominate above all “isms” including “Nationalism”.

  10. OnePakistani says:

    Alhamdulillah,

    There are people who are exposing this pimp of Pakistani-Black-Water.

    May Allah pure the hearts of Muslims from all *isms*. This crook is nothing but a big-mouth agent of the kuffar, disguising as a Muslim, declaring any Muslim who opposes him or his masters as apostates.

  11. Abeer says:

    I fully support your agreement. But our mindsets differ, and I’m sure Zaid Hamid would have no problem joining hands on the above agreement.

    Please present this agreement in written and take oath.

    Regards,

    Abeer

  12. Abu Muhammad says:

    @ Abeer

    Let him clear himself of this case FIRST. The things you mention are secondary.

    Please, don’t speak on behalf of Zaid Hamid, while the apparent of what he speaks of is totally different.

    Khilafah will not become by allying with the Kuffar(USA and allies) who is busy in droning Pakistan, and pushing it’s Crusade and extending it further into our region. No words are spoken against the terrorist of terrorists, America and it’s dirty alliance with Royal Army of Pakistan but rather portrayed as “Mujahids” and “Saviors” and “Rah-e-Haq kay Shaheed”.

    How can you expect us to join hands with supporters of Taghut, while they fight for the sake of Shaitan(America and allies) OPENLY and we fight for the sake of Allah,?

    Make no mistake, according to Sharia’h, this is all Batil, and we don’t see any step taken from the “Khilafah” of Zaid Hamid to criticize or stop this Un-islamic alliance.

  13. Abdud-Daiyan says:

    Assalamu-alaikum,
    Jazakallah Khair brothers and sisters for finally setting up this website. May Allah (SWT) bless all those at the Khatam-e-Nabuwat organisation for the strong stand they have taken on this issue and on those in the past. May Allah (SWT) bless and reward all who work for the Islamic cause in Pakistan and around the Ummah Inshallah.
    I was dubious about Zaid Hamid (ZH) from the beginning because (just to cite a very few examples):
    1. From the first episode of his TV program I saw there was a contradiction because how can someone be talking about Islamic issues when the young lady sitting opposite to him is be-Hijaab i.e not wearing Islamic dress. A person talks about changing Pakistan, if not the world but he cannot see to it that a young lady sitting in front of him wears the Islamic dress according to Sunnah. (By the way this was deliberate to entrap and entice viewers -particularly the youth).
    2. This person (ZH) was from day one mixing up Sufi ideas and doctrines as well as “mysticism” and “spiritual” matters with his talks on Islamic issues and Pakistan’s destiny. Anyone who knows anything about basic Islamic aqeedah (beliefs) could tell you that there were a lot of problems with the type of Islam ZH was extolling. Furthermore, they were being presented to an unsuspecting and ignorant public (particularly the youth – who are desperate for change in their lives and country) as if they were in accordance with the authentic teachings of Islam.
    3. Mr. ZH’s organisational style has all the hallmarks of a cult because:
    a) It is secretive by nature – an Islamic effort is genuinely open and welcoming to all Muslims who want to participate and is never secretive.
    b) Mr. ZH refuses to work with or include any person in his group if they have enough Islamic knowledge to start ask questions. Any person like this would threaten the cult leader’s position and so is excluded entry. Only the naive and gullible ones who are easily lead are invited because they are loyal and unquestioning. Compare this with Islamic groups where everyone is welcome and no-one is interested in becoming a “leader”.
    c) The people in ZH’s group have very little understanding of Islamic knowledge and are blindly following someone they “think” is right. They certainly have totally failed to understand the implications of the “Kazzab” issue. They are happy to continue getting their salaries and working for what they think is an “Islamic cause”.
    As far as the evidence for the points I mentioned regarding the nature of ZH’s team and it having all the hallmarks of a cult I would state the following:
    i. Firstly, (and this point is relevant to all of us as Muslims) our greatest tool is Islamic knowledge. Once we are well grounded on what Islam is ourselves it is relatively easy to distinguish what is Islamic and what is not. The problem with a lot of the people around ZH and also his general supporters on other websites who like his mix of Pakistani nationalism with a bit of Islam mixed in (to make them feel better that they are doing something “Islamic”) is that their Islamic concepts are very weak and hence when they are dealing with ZH – they are faced with an individual they cannot properly critique. This also applies to Ahmed Qureshi – who is a very nice guy and really good on Pakistan affairs, but is way out his depth on this one.

    ii. However, this is how you learn. In a way the youth will learn from this ZH controversy and this will increase their understanding Inshallah of Islamic issues and what is the criterion for those in leadership and dawah roles. Which brings me to my second point – I, personally, have spent time learning about Islamic and Pakistani political issues practically in the field. We have been through this sort of stuff countless times – with different groups and individuals. “Been there, seen it, done it”. Al-hamdulillah now Islamic activism has started in Pakistan people will learn quickly.

    iii. Thirdly, having said this, (as per the above point) I visited ZH and his offices quite a few times to see how I could get involved – it is from these personal experiences of meeting ZH and talking to his staff and checking out his premises (he has about 25 staff in his offices) that I came away with the impression that this was just another group that claimed to be Islamic – but disappointed on closer inspection.
    4. I was in no way at any stage against Mr ZH. All Muslims should be safe from the intentions and actions of other Muslims – this is part of our Islamic faith. A lot of what he says needs to be said and is merit worthy. However, many of us are experienced enough (politically and Islamically) to know that there were issues lurking in the background (other than the Islamic contradictions in his lectures and talks) which Mr ZH did not really want to address – a major one and one which is less important.
    5. The major issue is this: Now that we have 58 mins of ZH defending Yusuf even until a few days ago (who he called Ali and not Kazzab) and basically saying that an injustice had occurred what does this mean? It means that either ZH is right or all the Ulema, Khatam-e-Nabawat movement and all the government agencies who convicted that man were wrong. Now this means that if the original conviction was right (and having studied all the available evidence at length for myself and also listening in great detail to ZH it appears to me that the conviction was completely correct) and ZH is still defending him and degrading the Ulema and courts who convicted him. Now all that has to be done is that the 58 mins of documentary evidence should be submitted in front of the appropriate authorities and Ulema to show that ZH is still a believer and follower of Yusuf “Kazzab”. This is not a small issue since this person ZH, is attempting to mobilise and gather people to his cause. So this issue needs to be cleared up quickly and people need to decide for themselves whether then they want to follow and learn from this person.
    6. The minor issue is ZH claim to Jihad in Afghanistan. Where is the evidence for this from others who can verify his participation in battles etc. Mr ZH has photos of him in Afghanistan at that time. Nobody is suggesting that ZH was not in Afghanistan in the eighties – but we are all told that Mr ZH is a “very keen photographer” and a lot of people went to Afghanistan for all sorts of reasons during the Afghan Jihad. The reason all of this becomes relevant now is that Mr ZH is using his “Afghan Jihad” background as part of his public image projection (and one in which he revels by the way) – so before a lot of innocent people get mislead about ZH’s credibility and character – it’s time to sort this issue out as well.
    7. This whole affair has been a mess from start to finish, full of confusion and doubt, with all sorts of unanswered questions about motives and intentions. This is what happens when you make things up as you go along. According to Islam – an Islamic personality and his or her speech/actions should be free from doubt. Everyone in Pakistan knows that ZH is aided and abetted either directly or indirectly by the agencies/armed forces etc. It doesn’t take a genius to figure that one out. Or to figure out that all ZH’s programs are paid for air-time features with staged girly presenters asking prepared questions. Furthermore, if ZH is supposed to be giving an Islamic message to the gullible youngsters then why is there music and mixed gatherings at all his “shows” [and yes they are shows – more for entertainment rather than any serious effort for our deen or country] and what have individuals like Ali Azmat and Maria B got to do with Islamic dawah.
    8. We do not want an “Iqbaliyat” or “Iqbal Ka Pakistan”. Sure, I appreciate the contribution of Allama Iqbal like most Pakistanis but I don’t want any knew Dine-illahi type creation about Jinnah’s Pakistan or Iqbal’s Pakistan. We only want an Islamic Khilafah state based on the Allah’s law according to Quran and Sunnah and based on the example of our beloved Prophet Muhammad (SAW)’s Sunnah. Which was followed by the Khulafa-e-Rashideen (the four rightly guided Khalifs (RA).
    9. Neither do we want an armed forces sanctioned type Islam (“deeni ghairat ko paida karne ke liye”). Pakistan was only created to serve the interests of Islam and we will establish the Islamic way of life or die trying Inshallah.
    10. Mr. ZH has from day one cynically presented an easy to follow type of Islam to the impressionable (but Islamically non-practising) youth mixed with rousing political slogans – which means they do not have to change their unIslamic convictions and lifestyles. He has mixed nationalism with Islam (which Islam totally forbids) and tried to justify that it is in accordance with Islam. No, sorry, we don’t agree with any notion of “Pakistan First” (Pakistan sab se pehle) we identify ourselves first and foremost as Muslims and so we say “ISLAM FIRST, LAST AND ABOVE ALL”. I love Pakistan because it was created in the name of Islam and it is my part of the Ummah, where I was born and it is where I choose to live come what may. I will defend it (as my duty of Jihad fi-Sabilillah) from harm because it is Muslim land where Muslims live. That’s all. It is Islam and the Muslims that are our priority. Islam was there before Pakistan came into being. Islam will exist even if Pakistan is wiped from the map. Islam has no (and does not need) geographical boundaries.
    11. Most noteworthy, perhaps, is that frenzied “cyber world” supporters of ZH and his “mission” are bending over backwards to suggest that all this ‘Kazzab business’ is a distraction from the work of reforming Pakistan from its woes. Well to re-iterate these naive (and Islamically ignorant) patsies do not realise that we cannot entrust in any way shape or form our Islamic or political leadership in anyone whose character or credibility is invalidated by association with any Kazzab. More importantly these cyber/internet warrior supporters of ZH like characters do not realise that we in the real world are trying to actually bring about change on the ground and it is this ZH controversy that has proved the distraction. Talk about barking up the wrong tree.
    12. It is heartening to see that people like Ali Azmat and Maria B are experiencing an Islamic awakening in themselves and we pray for them and all other Muslims that they come to see that Islam is the ultimate truth (deen-ul Haqq). It’s ironic that Ali Azmat in many ways has a better understanding of domestic and international issues than Zaid Hamid (he obviously forms his opinions based on a more eclectic approach rather than ZH’s more parochial view) though he is the would be student vis-a-vis Zaid Hamid. Meaning that people like him represent greater potential for change because they are not beholden to certain quarters like ZH and therefore can (and do) speak out more freely against both internal and external enemies of Pakistan.
    13. However, when it comes to taking things into the public realm we don’t care what Ali Azmat and Maria B think “Islam means to them” or what their “take on Islamic issues” is – we only care what Allah and his Last and Final Messenger Muhammad (SAW) say about Islam. There is only one Islam and that is the Islam we love and die for – and Inshallah it is this Islam – the Islam that our beloved Prophet Muhammad (SAW) conveyed to his Sahaaba (RA) and the whole world until Qiyaamah that we will implement in Pakistan and the Ummah Inshallah. Enough of the side shows.

  14. tajzia says:

    Jazakallahu khairan Abdud Dayyan

  15. tajzia says:

    I have put this comment on our blog
    http://tajzia.wordpress.com/2010/03/12/zaid-hamid-here-and-after/
    i hope the admin does not mind

  16. Paklover says:

    I just came to this blog randomnly, and thought to comment about this issue. I like Abeer’s few clarifications. Look, We believe, as a muslims and pakistani, any one claimed to be prophet must be hanged to death, its in our consitution as well. But what about those who make people disputed regarding prophecy and religion, they should also be hanged. I personally respect most of the Ulma’s and molvi’s (but not all molvi’s). I saw many programs of Zaid Hamid, He only talked about Pakistan and Islam, He says bring the system of our beloved Prophet (S.A.W.W) and khulfa-e-rashdin… Ulma also say that, all religious political parties say that. He says ‘read Allama iqbal, Ulma also quote Allama iqbal, after all Iqbal’ is our national poet.
    So, the point is i think, zaid hamid is revolutionary islamic and defense analyst. Our loving few Ulma hazraat are unable to digest Zaid hamid’s popularity amoungs youngsters. I never saw youth going to any molvi on massive level. So, very respectfully, Accept him, and Yes if zaid hamid or any one hiddenly or openly claims about prophethood, every one has the right to oppose him and take him to the court.

  17. Abu Muhammad says:

    @ Paklover

    Your statements are not different from Zaid Hamid cult. In respond.

    If you have proofs that these Ulama have convicted Yousuf Kazzab falsely, then you produce your proofs to defend him. Where are your proofs?

    Don’t talk in the air.

    The dilemma today is the criteria we hold to identify a ‘scholar’. Anyone who is given air-time on TV, is not a ‘scholar’. A scholar is judged by other from the Ahl-e-Ilam, who testify to others, that Person A is a scholar.

    If the youth doesn’t go at a massive scale to the Ulama, it is their fault not the Ulama (Scholars) and now because of this fault, they are suffering behind this False Prophet cult. If they continue ahead with their ways, their sufferings will only going to increase.

    The Ulama are the last person who’ll get jealous if someone is REALLY WORKING TO ESTABLISH ISLAM. Ulama are free from your lame blames that you put, again following your cult, not to bring any proofs.

  18. khan says:

    This is all happening because we did not finish our job adequately in Liar Yusuf’s case and left his associates. In Battle of Yamama (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Yamama)Muslims fought under the leadership of Khalid Bin Walid and Liar Musaylimah was killed with his 7000 men.

    Muslims should bring ALL the associates of Liar yusuf into court for fair trial and justice, so that nobody will ever dare to commit/ support such heinous crime against fundamental human rights to maintain respect for human beliefs and faith.

    Spread the word and demand ZZH to be in court for full explanation about his faith and his role in the heinous crimes of Liar yusuf.

    Peace!

  19. khan says:

    Kindly include fatwa from Jamia Binoria about Lair zzh here..

  20. Usman afzal says:

    @abeer
    As far as your argument about “entering noor into yousaf kazzab body” is concerned then there is no noor of knowledge and wisdom which seeps into one’s body 😀
    and 2nd in some rohani silsalas some illiterate and week belief pplz think if they pass through some stages they will be pure and na ayozubillah there will be no difference b/w allah subhan u tallah n muhammad(PBUH) and that person coz everything was made of noor-e-subhan u tallah….if you hav a peer-e-kamal he’ll guide you properly but manay people get this information form books or some other peoples like em and they follow that typo believes which are totally wrong and in history many people have been sentenced to death by Islamic courts…

    i dont think there is any need of sharyi courts for this matter after ulma’s point of view…
    n as far as yousaf n zaid relationship is concerned he was his khalif-e-sadeeq and that is not designation fa and ordinary follower so everyone can assume that he was yousaf’s right hand…
    and this is not father son relationship he was his follower and follower of his thinking ideology and everything…

    i dont think any normal person will let a false prophet’s khalif rule our country and lead us to no way…..

  21. Aftab says:

    @Abu Muhammad@
    Respected Sir,
    After reviewing your posts i think you need to release some stress no one has knowledge of Ghaib Except Allah. What you are trying to prove is Zaid Hamid’s Intentions this where Allah’s authority comes. Leave it to Allah for now he has said everything clearly in his press talk. If he is planted trap or planing then dont worry Allah is the best Planner of All. I think you are not the one who is carrying Islam in Pakistan. And i have seen in your psot that you even started saying to abeer that he is behaving like his defense lawyer of Yousuf Kazab it means that you need some one to fight !! Please use your talent, energy and knowledge in right what the it should be used for the mankind dont waste it if i had it i would be useing it in Positive way like i would spread my knowledge of Islam without mixing it rather then my comments , reviews and poor understandings. okay
    Peace
    Fi Amanillah
    WaJazakumullahookhaira

  22. Aftab says:

    one more thing it is very easy to accuse some one here is an example

    (do you have a son ? and his name is Muhammad ? or have you adopted a son with the name of muhammad ?
    Who gave you the name you have ?”Abu Muhammad” and what are you claiming by using this name ?
    and after any of your answer i can produce an artical against you.
    See how easy it is 🙂 I hope you will understand. And if not then i leave you case to Allah
    Thanks

  23. Abu Muhammad says:

    @ Aftab

    I very well know that knowledge of Gaib is with Allah Alone. According to Shari’ah Zaid Hamid needs to do the following:

    Q: Person A was a follower of Yusuf Kazab, but now he says that he has “nothing to do with Yusuf or his beliefs or any other people like him”. What is the minimum requirement according to Shariah for Person A to come out clear from the mess he was involved in his past?

    A: According to Shariah, Person A will have to do the following:

    1. Acceptance – Accept publicly and openly that he “did” a mistake by negating the finality of Prophet Muhammad Salalaho Alayhi Wassalam and by following a liar Kazab and a false prophet.
    2. Repentance – Repent that what ever he did was indeed a great sin and do Tauba and Astaghfar with Allah Subhanahu Ta’ala.
    3. Disassociate – Disassociate publicly and openly that now he is no more a follower of Yusuf Kazab and his beliefs
    4. Condemn – Condemn publicly and openly that Yusuf Kazab was indeed a liar and a murtid
    5. Tajdeed e Iman – Do tajdeed of Iman (which also includes tajdeed of Aqid e Khatm e Nubuwwat) publicly and openly
    6. Tajdeed e Nikah – Do tajdeed of Nikah

    Courtesy

    After that I don’t have anything against him and nothing to fight over. Your assumption regarding me, that I’m need someone to fight, is wrong. If that would be the case, you would have seen a blog from me for each and every politician I’m against.

    Yeah, Allah is the best of planners and He has exposed the plans of Zaid Hamid, without any of our abilities. Allah uses people among the Muslim Ummah to take care of the fitnah and this is what we are trying to do and I believe this is the BEST WAY TO PUT YOUR TALENT, ENERGY AND KNOWLEDGE.

  24. Abu Muhammad says:

    @ Aftab

    Thank you for the cheap shot. Next time bring something logical. Since, you seem to be very naive of Shari’ah and it’s principles, I strongly advice you to learn Shari’ah and it’s principles before you take this intelligent step to defend Zaid Hamid.

  25. Mustafa Hussain Modan says:

    As Salam O alikum

    Alhamdullilah I am very proud that I am sitting amongst some people who are Shahib-e-Ilm.

    I too myself thought Zaid Zaman Hamid was fishy when I first heard him. He used to make a lot of noise about Shariah and Khilafat, but his show included such elements that were against every teachings of Islam. His show promoted Fahashi (in the form of Gender Mixing), Moosiki (as in Music Shows before and after each time his show happens), Promotion of Nationalism on a large scale and not to forget Pagen Practices and festivals.

    Moreover, Whenever I listened to Zaid’s lecture I use to go into deep depression because in every lecture of his there were many problems (Tortures and Zulms) that were pointed out but there were no solutions given as how to avoid all these problems. The only thing Zaid Zaman Use to say was that we should do NOTHING (not even praying or Practicing Islam) and Allah would grant us everything.

    One more disturbing fact about Zaid Zaman Hamid was that he never asked his followers to pray Namaz or to recite the Quran; all he used to do is use Islam as a tool to promote WAR hysteria and fulfill other agendas that the Army or ISI have. Now any rational person can analyze that true followers of Zaid Zaman Hamid (Eg. Ali Azmat and Maria B) do not follow even the basics of Islam and Zaid Hamid is supposedly telling us that these people are perfect endorsers of Islam and at times these people are taken as the secondary role model after Zaid Zaman Hamid.

    So to make this long discussion short, we have to preach to our brothers and sisters in a manner that they are not offended (or shocked) by this Zaid Hamids Falsehood. We have to preach them about this fitna as well as teach them the techniques of avoiding such Fitnas in the future. Teach people regarding the importance of Namaz, Roozah, Zakat, and Hajj….. and make them practice these basics of Islam in their lives and after this I am sure Allah (SWT) would give them proper guidance and Hidayat.

    Alhamdullilah Brother I have also started this spread of awareness regarding this fitna for quite some time … and even before all these things were proven, I used to preach about this fact that any person who depicts the wrong image of Islam and Ignores the basic teachings of the Practical Islam is not worth listening. So If any help is needed in this regards InshAllah this Abduallah Will always be here to spread the message of Islam and Quran, and to safeguard the brothers and sisters and to spread the true word of Islam.

    Jazak Allah … wah …
    As Salam O Alikum

  26. wiseman says:

    if you understand islam disband this site once person clarified himself as per sharia fulfilling all the requirements
    and disassociating himself from his past activities then as Muslim it our responsibility to accept him as Muslim and leave matter between ALLAH and Him.

    If i buy your story after his press conference and sharai declaration then i have to declare all converted muslims as Kafir because of their affiliation with non Muslims and followers of other religion.

    This all i can say to all of you.please don’t listen to specific Mullas and ulemas.please study this issue in light of quran and sunnah by yourselves.Islam never ordered us to follow others.Just search on internet about hadiths and quranic verse in the matter of declaring muslim kafir and decide what is best solution of this issue.

    MAY ALLAH SHOW RIGHT PATH AMEEN!

  27. Abu Muhammad says:

    @ Wiseman

    The Case Zaid Hamid is not be compared with the other non-Muslims conversion. I feel due to some lack of knowledge of Shari’ah, that has compelled you to say this. Thus, I’d like to update you regarding the ruling on the person who is a follower of any Kazzab, what he should do from Shari’ah point of view in order to free himself.

    Q: Person A was a follower of Yusuf Kazab, but now he says that he has “nothing to do with Yusuf or his beliefs or any other people like him”. What is the minimum requirement according to Shariah for Person A to come out clear from the mess he was involved in his past?

    A: According to Shariah, Person A will have to do the following:

    1. Acceptance – Accept publicly and openly that he “did” a mistake by negating the finality of Prophet Muhammad Salalaho Alayhi Wassalam and by following a liar Kazab and a false prophet.
    2. Repentance – Repent that what ever he did was indeed a great sin and do Tauba and Astaghfar with Allah Subhanahu Ta’ala.
    3. Disassociate – Disassociate publicly and openly that now he is no more a follower of Yusuf Kazab and his beliefs
    4. Condemn – Condemn publicly and openly that Yusuf Kazab was indeed a liar and a murtid
    5. Tajdeed e Iman – Do tajdeed of Iman (which also includes tajdeed of Aqid e Khatm e Nubuwwat) publicly and openly
    6. Tajdeed e Nikah – Do tajdeed of Nikah

    Courtesy

    Zaid Hamid is just running away by just following Point # 5, which doesn’t clarify his position from Islamic point of view. Please note, these rules doesn’t apply on a person who converts to a Muslim. Thus your argument is very illogical to defend Zaid Hamid from Shari’ah point of view.

  28. wiseman says:

    How do you know that he is following point 5 can you see what is in his heart! if you think that yes you can declare
    any one kafir you are also doing shirk! do you know this by claiming that any person is liar becuase “I THINK”
    Just read Hadith about two jews one of them always said you will go to heLl! and in the end the one who said this went
    to hell! Never compare any ordinary human with powers of prophets and AllAah! Only Allah’s knows what is in the heart of humans! if he decided to expose humans we all will find out “HOW GOOD FOLLOWERS ISLAM” WE ARE IN REAL LIFE!
    Don’t cross your limits becuase ALLAH hates those who crossed their limits in any way!

  29. Abu Muhammad says:

    @ Wiseman

    Sorry to say your reply was very unwise. You refuted yourself with your own past. That is what we are saying that we judge by the APPARENT and not by INTENTION IN HEART.

    Since Zaid Hamid APPARENTLY has not followed those 5 steps to get himself off from Yousuf Kazzab, we have to believe that he is still a follower of Yousuf Kazzab.

    Thus, don’t tell us to cross limits, while we very well are very much inside the limits of Shari’ah and explaining to you Shari’ah matters, which you know not.

  30. laraib says:

    Allah ki lanat jhoote nabi ke khaleefa par

  31. Lol.... nahi kalay kartoot ki Topi says:

    pata nahi Zaman hamid ne konsa aisa GUnah kia tha jo usko ZAID jaisa KAZZAB milaa

    LANAAT ho iase Jhootay shaks pe aur jitnay JOOTAY marya jayaaoin kaam hia

    ISlam aur shariah layga is MULK mai ali azmat aur maria B k sath …………….jinka pasia pa nahi Halal ka hai ya haram ka
    Kia hamaree SHARIAT ganay bajany ki , TASVEER banwanay ki ijazat deteee hia >???

    aab to ganay bajany aur Fachion karanay walay “Kabay k samne Tasveer” banwanay walon k sath is mulk mai SHariah aur khilafat lainge LANAT HO LANAT

  32. Rhymes says:

    Zaid hamid is a great mean , U ppl are backed by CIA agents, MAY ALLAH Send u ppl LAANAT in this world and here after

    Zaid hamid ke chehre pe NOOOR dekha hai ? Zaid has no connections with yusuf kazaab now

    Tum log AAkhrat main jalogeee AMEEN

  33. SFH says:

    @Rhymes

    I was a big fan of ZH until I got to know that he was involved or most probably responsible of a murder of one Ulama named Jalalpuri. I just want to inform those people who think ZH is a hero, he could be a liar too.
    Then i saw this video where ZH is clearly refusing that he personally don’t know any Yusuf Kazzab. But that could be a lie too. What extremely confuses me is that ZH is working too hard to save Pakistan and he talks a lot of good stuff and undoubtedly motivates the nation of Pakistan, but on the other end if his believes are really against Sharia and he is a follower of Yusuf Kazzab then ZH will take this country towards more problems. But who knows if he is a right Muslim or not. So, i decided to follow the Ulamas of Pakistan rather than ZH. because ZH is not an Alim or Mufti after all.

  34. Fahad says:

    jazakallah khair

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s