Emaad Khalid confirms what ZHE team has been saying for the past 1 year.

After analyzing Zaid Hamid’s various posts and videos, ZHE team concluded that Zaid Hamid is actively conspiring against the state in order to create a mutiny in the Armed forces to bring about a military coup.

We made theses revelations in a video around 1 year ago, in which we compared Zaid Hamid’s attempts to Brig Ali, a rogue officer who was arrested for making similar plans.

Emaad Khalids revelations in these two interviews confirm what ZHE team has been saying for a long time.


Zaid Hamid is not just a blasphemer, he is also working against the state of Pakistan and deserves to be tried for High Treason under Article 6 of the constitution.

Zaid Hamid Defends Yusuf Kazzab on Point Blank With Mubashir Lucman [Video]

In a recent program of Point Blank with Mubashir Lucman, Zaid Hamid was questioned about his links with Yusuf Kazzab. Recording of the program is embedded above.

In the first video from 2:00 – 3:30

Mubashir Lucman states that he believes in Prophet Muhammad saaw being the last prophet and Zaid Hamid agrees.

Then Mubashir further states that if someone has claimed to be a Prophet after Prophet Muhammad saaw is a Kazzab. Zaid agrees to that too, but once again fails to call Yusuf Kazzab to be a Kazzab by specifically taking his name.

From 4:30 – 6:30

Mubashir Lucman refers to a story of Daily Ummat in which Daily Ummat discloses that Zaid Hamid has divorced his wife because she was unwilling to follow the deviant path of Yusuf Kazzab.

Zaid Hamid’s response: I dont want to comment on Daily Ummat and all this is non-sense and rubbish.

Mubashir Lucman: So this Divorce news is not true ?

Zaid Hamid: No, that is my personal matter. I had differences with my wife … blah blah.

So Zaid Hamid claims that Ummat published a false and fabricated story about Zaid Hamid divorcing his wife, but then accepts that he has divorced his wife. Then how on earth does, the report of Ummat becomes false and fabricated ?

What Mubashir Lucman failed to tell his audience was that the report was published in Daily Ummat after reporters from Daily Ummat conducted a thorough and detailed interview with Zaid Hamid’s ex-wife. So nothing in that report was baseless or fabricated.

From 9:00 – till end of part 1

Start of 2nd Part – 3:30

Mubashir Lucman asks him about his Afghan Jihad and states that your closed friends state that you went to Afghanistan once or twice, but were never involved in real Jihad there.

Zaid Hamid responds by saying that all of his heroics in Afghanistan are well-documented.

Mubashir Lucman Ahmed Shah Masood was fighting against Taliban, So you fought against Taliban ?

Zaid Hamid responds Look Mubashir I came out of Afghanistan in 1992, and In 1992 there was no existence of Taliban

But what Zaid Hamid refused to tell was that it was the same people against whom he fought together with Ahmed Shah Masood, that later became Taliban. Zaid Hamid’s close friends with whom ZHE has also spoken state that Zaid Hamid was supporting Northern Alliance and Ahmed Shah Masood and used to come to Pakistan and call the real Mujahideen to be Thieves and Bandits. It was these same Mujahideen who later became Taliban.

From 3:53 – 5:00

Mubashir Lucman Then you came to Pindi, so when did you started Brasstacks ?

Zaid Hamid responds that He first joined Brinks in 1994 as a manager and stayed with it for 5 years. So Zaid Hamid is admitting that he remained with Brinks till 1999.

The case against Yusuf Kazzab was started in 1997 and was judged in 2000. It is well documented in news papers, that Brinks was providing security to Yusuf Kazzab and his house in Lahore, even when Yusuf was on trial in Court. If you read the news papers of the time, you will see repeated mentions of the fact that a Manager of a private security company is also a follower of Yusuf Kazzab.

Now you may know that who that manager was.

From 5:20 – 5:50

Mubashir Lucman So when did you met Yusuf ?

Zaid Hamid responds that he met Yusuf in 1992 in Karachi. After 1992, I left Karachi – so people of Karachi dont know how much and what relations I had with Yusuf. Whatever they say is suni sunai and jhoot.

The problem with this is that in his leaked video – that was leaked in early march. Zaid Hamid states that he met Yusuf in 1992 but then came to Rawalpindi, so then he do not know what Yusuf did and had no contact with Yusuf.

But now he is stating that he met Yusuf in 1992, but then he came to Rawalpindi so the people of Karachi do not know what contacts he had with Yusuf.

From 5:50 – 8:20

Mubashir Lucman Why you introduced Yusuf in your close circles by stating that he is a Rohani Shakhsiat and can make you have Ziarat of Prophet saaw. ?

Zaid Hamid responds Rubbish, total rubbish.

Zaid Hamid further states that Yusuf was a mystic.

But the problem with this response is, that the people whom Zaid Hamid introduced to Yusuf by stating that Yusuf will make you meet Prophet saaw are still alive and can testify to this anytime anywhere. Zaid Hamid even told Hesham Syed that he has already met Prophet saaw but has not recognized him. Hesham Syed states that he has no doubt that Zaid Hamid was referring to Yusuf Kazzab.

Zaid Hamid states that Yusuf was a mystic but fails to tell, what was it that Yusuf used to say to people to show that he is a mystic.

Yusuf used to tell people that he is a mystic of such caliber that he can make them meet Prophet saaw. Yusuf used to demand money from people in order to make them meet Prophet saaw and then used to take them in a room and state to them that he is Muhammad (Nauzobillah).

Mubashir Tries to Rescue Zaid Hamid

Mubashir Lucman then wastes half of his program on a discussion of poetry in religion, which had nothing to do with Yusuf Kazzab issue. Poetry or Iqbal’s ideology was never a point of contention between ZHE/AMTKN and Zaid Hamid.

After allowing Muhammad Ayub to make his point and interpret in his own words, the ayats of Holy Quran – Mubashir stated in the end that it might be possible that some of us are not interpreting Quran or Fiqah correctly.

So is Mubashir trying to say that just like Muhammad Ayub was misinterpreting the verses on poets and poetry, we are misinterpreting the verses on Khatam e Nabuwwat and Finality of Prophethood ?

Mubashir Lucman felt it to be fair to invite Zaid Hamid to his show to take his point of view on the Yusuf Kazzab issue, but failed to invite Ulema of AMTKN to take their point of view on the same issue.

Mubashir Lucman invited son of Khalid Khawaja on his show to take his point of view on the Hamid Mir controversy, but failed to invite Hamid Mir to take Hamid’s point of view on the same issue.

And then Mubashir claims that it is fair to invite a person to take his point of view and this is what objective journalism should be. But shouldnt an objective journalist also invite the other party to hear to their point of view as well ?

Perhaps that does not fall in the category of objective journalism, specially if someone’s objective is to provide the audience with biased analysis and twisted and one sided narratives.

Mubashir stated in the end that Zaid Hamid has clarified everything, but what exactly has he clarified.

We alleged that Zaid Hamid knew Yusuf Kazzab. Zaid Hamid has now accepted it.

We alleged that Zaid Hamid defended Yusuf Kazzab in Court. This is a fact and Zaid Hamid has never denied it.

We alleged that Zaid Hamid defended Yusuf Kazzab even after his death. This is a fact as is evident from Zaid Hamid’s Daily DAWN article of 2000, his leaked video of March 2010. It is evident from the fact that he still defends Kazzab and states that Yusuf never claimed to be a prohet and the fact that Zaid Hamid still refuses to call Yusuf a Kazzab.

So again what exactly did Zaid Hamid clarified ? Oh yes. He clarified that he was associated with Yusuf Kazzab.

Zaid Hamid Refuses To Call Yusuf a Kazzab Even After An Eye Witness Testifies That Yusuf Called Himself a Prophet [Video]

Zaid Hamid has refused to call Yusuf a Kazzab even after Bilal Qutb who was the host of the program Door Andaish testified in front of Zaid Hamid that Yusuf Kazzab called himself to be a Prophet in front of Bilal Qutb. Recently Zaid Hamid appeared in a TV program called Door Andaish on Value TV. Incidently, the host of the program Bilal Qutb also happened to be a neighbor of Yusuf Kazzab at Shadman, Lahore.

During the interview Zaid Hamid stated that Yusuf Kazzab never declared himself to be a Prophet infront of him. Bilal Qutb recalled this for his TV audience that in Zaid Hamid’s meeting with Dr Israr, Dr Israr referred Zaid Hamid to a person who was an eye-witness of Yusuf Kazzab’s claim of prophethood. Zaid Hamid side-stepped from this statement and ignored it totally. On this, Bilal Qutb informed Zaid Hamid that he was a neighbor of Yusuf Kazzab at Shadman, Lahore and Yusuf Kazzab himself told Bilal Qutb that there is a Mohr e Nabuwwat on Yusuf Kazzab’s back. Bilal Qutb stated that he asked Yusuf Kazzab to show him the Mohr e Nabuwwat. On this Yusuf Kazzab said that not everyone can see the Mohr e Nabuwwat but his wife has seen the Mohr. Bilal Qutb said that he can say all this by putting his hand on the Holy Quran and said that he is giving a solemn statement.

But even after hearing this eye-witness shahadaat (gawahi) Zaid Hamid refused to call Yusuf a Kazzab and continued to repeat his lame arguments that go to Shariah Court and give this Shahadat in Shariah Court and get Yusuf declared a Kazzab in Shariah Court and only then I will declare him a Kazzab.

Zaid Hamid further stated that Yusuf never uttered such blasphemous views in front of him. This is a total and utter lie, since Zaid Hamid was present at Bait e Raza and during his Bait e Raza speech Yusuf Kazzab stated that Allah and Muhammad saaw are one, which is nothing but Shirq. And in the same Bait e Raza speech Yusuf Kazzab declared that a 2.5 year old child has seen Prophet Muhammad saaw i.e. Yusuf Kazzab.

It is hard to believe that Yusuf uttered his blasphemous views in front of his neighbor of a few years i.e. Bilal Qutb – but never told Zaid Hamid about his Mohr e Nabuwwat even though Zaid Hamid knew him since 1992 and defended Yusuf Kazzab till Yusuf was killed in Jail.

Zaid Hamid says that he never supported the views of Yusuf Kazzab, but during the entire court proceedings – Yusuf Kazzab’s views were discussed and Zaid Hamid was present in each and every session to show his solidarity to his Prophet. If he did not supported Yusuf Kazzab’s views, what was he doing in the court sessions. If Zaid Hamid did not supported Yusuf Kazzab’s views why did he write the article in Daily DAWN calling Yusuf Kazzab to be a great scholar of Islam and a great sufi. If this is not called supporting Yusuf Kazzab’s views than what else is called supporting Yusuf Kazzab’s views ?

Zaid Hamid’s fans will still say that it is now proved that Zaid Hamid is not a follower of Yusuf Kazzab since he has called Yusuf to be corrupt. But what they fail to see is that Zaid Hamid has refused to call Yusuf a Kazzab even when a Muslim has given Shahadat in front of Zaid Hamid on National TV that Yusuf stated that there is Mohr e Nabuwwat on his back. Zaid Hamid has refused to call Yusuf a Kazzab even when Dr Israr referred him to eye-witnesses who can testify that Yusuf used to call himself Prophet Muhammad saaw (Nauzobillah).

Zaid Hamid’s fans and every other muslim should know that entire Deen is based on Shahadat (Gawahi). Hazrat Abu Bakr RA never heard Musailma Kazzab calling himself to be a prophet. However, Musailma was declared a Kazzab because enough people testified (gave shahadat) that Musailma has declared himself to be a prophet. Hazrat Abu Bakr RA accepted this testimony of other people. One important thing to note here is that Hazrat Abu Bakr RA accepted the testimony of other people and declared Musailma to be a Kazzab, but Zaid Hamid is refusing to accept the testimony of other Muslims and saying that these testimonies does not fulfill Shariah principles. Does this not mean that Zaid Hamid is saying that Hazrat Abu Bakr RA did not fully understood Shariah principles that is why He RA accepted the testimony of others – without himself going and listening to Musailma’s point of view.

Zaid Hamid stated that what sort of a person calls his Nabi to be corrupt. This is what Zaid Hamid’s fans also state here and there. But for the information of Zaid Hamid and his fans, before Zaid Hamid’s association with Yusuf Kazzab became public, Zaid Hamid never ever called Yusuf to be Gumrah or corrupt. Zaid Hamid can not show a single public statement or writing in which he has called Yusuf to be Gumrah or corrupt before 2008. In fact in his video leaked by students of Shifa Medical college, that created this entire storm – Zaid Hamid went as far as calling Khabrain and Zia Shahid to be corrupt. So previously he was calling Khabrain to be corrupt, but now that has changed and now Zaid Hamid has realized that it was not Khabrain but Yusuf who was corrupt. Zaid Hamid is now calling Yusuf to be corrupt to side-step from having to call Yusuf a Kazzab. This is what Bilal Qutb also referred to, that Qadyani’s do the same thing. They side-step from the real argument and accept petty things but never accept that Mirza Qadyani was a Kazzab and a False Prophet. Zaid Hamid is doing nothing new. He is just following the foot steps of Qadyanis.

The most funny thing about Zaid Hamid’s arguments were that on the one hand he was refusing to call Yusuf a Kazzab stating that Shariah requirements were not fulfilled and on the other hand he was saying that he is not a religious expert who can give Fatwa. Zaid Hamid if you are not a religious expert who can give fatwa, how can you declare that Shariah requirements to call Yusuf a Kazzab were not fulfilled ? At one hand you state that you are not a religious expert but on the other hand you make statements that sound as if you know religion more than Dr Israr, Moulana Abdur Rehman Ashrafi, Mufti Ghulam Sarwar Qadri, Mufti Naeem and other top religious scholars – all of whom declared Yusuf to be a Kazzab.

By calling his own prophet corrupt and gumrah, with whom Zaid Hamid spent 10 years of his life and from whom Zaid Hamid learned all his spirituality and religion, Zaid Hamid has proved that he is not loyal even to his False Prophet – Yusuf Kazzab.

Do listen to this statement of Bilal Qutb in which he said that when I am giving you Shahadat that Yusuf declared himself to be a Nabi and you are still refusing to call him a Kazzab – where all your Ishq e Rasool has gone at this time ?

The discussion on Yusuf Kazzab issue starts around 5:00 of Part 3 and continues in Part 4 of the interview.

Hesham Syed's Detailed Interview on Yusuf Kazab and Zaid Hamid Published In Daily Jasarat

In his recent visit to Karachi, Pakistan Hesham A Syed met with the core team of ZHE. We have already posted about it on our Facebook page. Hesham Sahib is an eye-witness of Yusuf Kazab’s claim of prophethood and Zaid Zaman Hamid and Junaid Zaman’s (Zaid Hamid’s brother) association with Yusuf. During his visit, Hesham Syed gave a detailed interview to Daily Jasarat. The interview begins with Hesham Sahib’s personal life so that everyone can get to know him as a person, but then goes on to discuss Hesham Sahib’s meetings with Yusuf Kazab.

Hesham Sahib has personally told this author that during a meeting with Zaid Hamid, Zaid Hamid told him that “Hesham Sahib has met Prophet Muhammad saaw but he didnt recognized Prophet Muhammad saaw”.

Hesham Sahib has mentioned this in his interview as well. The interview follows below:

For Full Screen Mode, Click Here.

Source: Daily Jasarat

The Truth – a story of a follower and activist of Zaid Hamid..

M Hamza Bakhshi Stop deleting my post, let people read the truth.

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

I write this post with a heavy heart.

To all my brothers and sisters who are still firm believers and followers of Zaid Hamid I only ask that you read this with an open mind without the ‘conspiracy theory’ blanket we place on all anti-zaid hamid comments.

I met Zaid Hamid before the wake up series, It was actually a coincidence. He was dining in at a restraunt and i happened to bump into him. At the time his Brass Tack programs were starting to pick up quite a following. I remember walking up to him and hugging him and telling him how proud my family was of the honourable work he was doing.

Zaid Hamid has a very large presence, one that draws you in. As soon as you meet him you want to know him better you want to be his friend. He has this special way of connecting with people and I felt that immediately. Zaid Hamid spoke to me for a few minutes but left a deep impression.

Some time after this meeting a relative of mine got involved with Zaid Hamid in the wake up series. I made it a point to attend these and try to ‘educate’ my skeptic friends on the greatness of the vision and ideology of Zaid Hamid.

This whole issue of Yusuf Kazzab didnt effect me at the beginning. True, I didn’t understand what Zaid Hamid’s strategy was in dealing with this. Why he denied and then he didn’t. I, non the less, as an unquestioned follower tried to explain to everyone about the intricacies of the situation. I told them Zaid Hamid did not tell anyone to avoid fitna between sects and that it all made sense if you just spent some time to understand it.

I know, since some of my friends were also followers, that we all deep down had questions. I suppose its normal. I mean after all one fine morning Zaid Hamid is the talk of the town. Where did he come from? What does he represent?

Anyhow, I guess I chose to ignore everything. Until – now after reading the next paragraph you can doubt what i say, have a problem with it or agree with it. Frankly, I am only telling you because I feel I have to. I am not interested in a debate, what you choose to do is up to you.

I met a man, who I and the people I know, hold in the highest of esteem and reverence (which is probably irrelevant to you – I will call him Haq Sahib). Haq Sahib knew Yusuf Kazzab, and he mentioned how him and others like him were partly to blame since they made him the monster that he turned out to be. They would praise him, follow and obey him without question. Haq Sahib told me of a sermon that Yusuf Kazzab gave, a sermon I discarded when i heard it before. Haq Sahib narrated that sermon nearly word for word. In this sermon Yusuf Kazzab introduces Zaid Hamid – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUyshh4G-QU – as his sahabi.

Zaid Hamid didnt only know Yusuf Kazzab he was one of his closest associates.

This revelation of was the final nail in the coffin.

This is the truth my friends. Zaid Hamid is lying about his association with Yusuf Kazzab. This is a fundemental flaw in his person and hence in all he represents. This brings to question his purpose and mission.

It is sad, and painful to come to terms with this but we can be excused because we all wholeheartedly followed him in search of truth, answers and solutions. Because he drew us to him through his personality and oratorical ability. Because as youth of this great nation we were desperate to be part of something big, something that would change the course of history. Something for Pakistan.

I leave you all to poke holes in this article and satisfy yourself in which ever way you please. I however have come to know and hope so will all of you.

Author: M Hamza Bakhshi

Note: The story was originally posted on the discussion board of Zaid Hamid Fb fanpage. However, we expect that the Zaid Hamid team will continue with its fascist ways to suppress freedom of expression and hence will remove this post instead of answering this person. The author has already requested the admins of Zaid Hamid fan page to not delete his narrative and let people read it.

Muhammad Assad ex-member PKKH: 'PKKH belongs to BT, Get that straight'

We conducted an interview with Muhammad Assad, an ex-member of PKKH. The interview is being published here in verbatim.

What was your role at PKKH and Why did you left PKKH ?

I worked for PKKH as Communication head. I was the admin of the PKKH Discussion Forums. I separated around 9 months back along with one of the PKKH founder over differences on the Pak Army operation. Later I rejoined PKKH in few weeks to assume my responsibilities as PKKH Communication Head until last month.

I also met ZH on PKKH Special protocol on his visit to Saudi Arabia.

You can see my profile on PKKH Forum here. I was responsible to set up , manage and market the forum.

Profile name: acid.

What is PKKH and what are its Goals and Objectives ?

On the papers , PKKH goals and objectives are as stated on their website i.e raise awareness of Pakistani real politics and corrupt ideologies and external influence on Pakistan etc. All these are just stated goals and objectives and used as a public relation exercise.

However , the true goal of PKKH is not a word different than of BrassTacks. That is to carry on Zaid Hamid’s agenda under different names and covers.

What is the Funding model of PKKH ?

I am not aware how exactly is PKKH funded but all expenses are paid by Dan Qayyum who himself is part of another organization which you will see in my answer to the following questions.

Are there any paid employees. If yes what are there pay scales ?

No paid employees in PKKH Team. This is what is APPARENT. Since PKKH itself is a wing of other sister organizations , I am not aware If key employees are paid or unpaid.

What is Zaid Hamid’s role in PKKH. What influence he has on PKKH. Is PKKH really independent of Brasstacks as Dan Qayyum suggests it is ?

Zaid Hamid is effectively the director of PKKH and possess the influence of the director. PKKH is not an independent organization as has been suggested. It runs closely in affiliation with BrassTacks. There are a number of BrassTacks members who are also in PKKH Team , for example , Zaki Khalid , Who holds position in BrassTacks and is also head of Media dept. for PKKH.

There has been meetings between BrassTack members and PKKH members in UAE around mid of 2009.

What is your assessment of Zaid Hamid as a person and as a security analyst ?

Zaid Hamid is a masked guy. He used his communication skill to impress the masses into believing his agendas. From my research, Zaid Hamid spends lot of time in digging information from google and present into his Urdu programs. Take ‘Economic Terrorism’ for example which is just the Urdu version of Zeitgeist documentary. Since our Pakistan people, unfortunately, are unaware and ignorant of such facts, they got really impressed by what Zaid Hamid had to say (they dont know that all he is doing is google search).

Initially Zaid Haimd focused his programs into wider issues e.g. the economic system and CIA threats. He developed reputation and credibility from these ‘external focused’ programs which were mostly appropriate content wise.

After scoring on his initial programs, he shifted his focus deeply into the Pakistan politics. This is the point where he started to infiltrate his ideologies into his so called analysis. The Pakistan population got trapped here and started to follow and believe his analysis as they believed his initial programs. He provides anti India and Isareli analysis which is easy to believe for the Pakistani masses.

I believe Zaid Hamid analysis is nothing but just myths and tales in the name of Pakistan which aim to play with emotionally distressed Pakistani citizens. As far as Zaid Hamid as person, than I think there is enough for it on your website.

Anything else that you feel is worth sharing.

Dan Qayyum belongs to Zaid Hamid. PKKH belongs to BT. Get that straight. Do not let different covers deceive you. ZH has managed to team up the rich spoilt kids, who are ‘immature’ in his own words. But his success would be short lived because one day these immature will get mature too.

He do believe that he is right thats why he is being successful. Success has deceived him. Even the Kufar is now days the most successful nation but there end would be an evil abode.

Best Regards,

Zaid Hamid Admits his Links to Yousuf Kazzab and Defends him

The Exegesis:

  1. He still defends Yousaf Kazzab and defends him through his ‘Shari’ah Interpretation’, implying thereby as if the Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat don’t have any record on it.
  2. He insulted the Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat by saying they were threatening the court, to pass judgement against Yousuf Kazzab.
  3. He insulted the Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat by saying words like ‘Maulvi beech phass gayee”, “Maulvi beech main ghusair diyee gayyee” “paisoon waisoon kay chakkar main”. In other plain words, he accused Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat that they had ‘wordly motives of money’ and again doesn’t prove it.
  4. He is totally misrepresenting facts. This has been replied as under:Q: Some people say that the Yusuf Kazab became a victim of Daily Khabrain Editor Zia Shahid’s enmity because Zia Shahid had some land/money dispute with Yusuf Kazab?A: Suppose, if this was the case, then leave Zia Shahid, and take rest of the evidences, which are too much, coming from too many sources, too strong and too crystal clear in nature. AMTKN challenges any one who have any “proof” that Yusuf Kazab did not claimed to be a prophet, please come forward and AMTKN will listen him/her carefully, analyze those proofs and will clarify its stance publicly with all those proofs and counter-proofs. Its an open challenge for any one.
  5. He blamed the Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat by saying that ‘they were bought by the Khabrain Akhbar’. Again a lie which he has prefected from his predecessor – Yousuf Kazzab
  6. He consideres still Yousuf Ali not a Kazzab and considers him to be a Muslim and Scholar.
  7. Regarding the issue of Maulana Abdul Sattar Niazi, Zaid Hamid is lying again. The following is the fact: (Br. Talha Saad)
    “It is a lie that Molana Abdus Sattar Niazi supported Yousf Kazzab.”

    A comrade of ours went to mulana Niazais students and they told him the real story. When Molana Abdus Sattar Niazi was very sick,in his last days Yusuf Kazzab went to him, grabbed his feet and started crying.

    He told him that he was a true lover and slave of prophet(SA), and that he didnt declare prophecy…in return molana replied“ a bench of ulema should be made to decide ur matter…if you are masoom than you will be free and if you are proven wrong than you will be executed…(he didnt say that yusuf didnt declare prophecy)…”

    After that Yusuf altered this news and told the press as Zaid Hamid says it. The next day Molana Abdus Aattar Niazi condemned it and did a press conference that Yusuf Ali lied about him.

  8. He said he’ll keep 9mm Pistol with him, we’ll make a judge, whoever is proved wrong he’ll put a hole in his head.
  9. Since, when the punishment of lying became death penality instead of lashes?
  10. Calls that he’ll have the Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat hanged and lashed. Is this how a sensible person will talke Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat who defended this Ummah from the fitnah of Qadyanis and Gohar Shahis?
  11. He doesn’t want to clear himself from the Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat by excusing that there is no Islamic Law. With this excuse, the Qadyanis should be called Muslims as well, because there was no Islamic Law when they were called Kafir.
  12. Accusing Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat of doing a naPak-Paleet Game-plan against him.
  13. Called Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat as the most ‘ghatiah’ (low) Maulvi on earth? Is this the adab and manners to those who defend Khatam-e-Nabuwwat of Prophet (s)?
  14. Doesn’t give any appropriate answer against from here he made all this Videos and who was sponser of it?
  15. Calls Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat ‘Bloody Liers’.
  16. Makes fun of their Beards, Imamah’s and makes fun of Aalmi Masjlis e Tuhafzze-e-Nabuwwat. They will listen absues from me.
  17. Calls Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat murderers (May be he is showing is anger of his False Prophet being murdered on them), accused lies ( Same case, defendsFalse Prophet Yousaf Kazzab).
  18. Zaid Hamid become a ‘Shariah Judge’ passes judgement on the Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat and says they should be punished by lashes.
  19. Doesn’t want to make this evidences on public. [It is public now]
  20. He doesn’t for the sake of ‘Allah’ as well as ‘Messenger’ (s), though being a Muslim we do things only for the sake of ‘Allah’.
  21. Lies that Dr. Israr and other groups are with us. Dr. Israr and group already apologized for associating with him because he was not aware and personally he has met Zaid Hamid only two times.
  22. Calls Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat corrupt and criminal. Accuses Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat of distorting ‘Shariah’ and letting it apart.
  23. Allah and Rasool say koi darta hai? ( A Muslim only fear Allah Alone). He has some freak concepts.
  24. Doesn’t recite the word of Allah correctly. It doesn’t start with ‘Tu’minoona’, it starts with ‘Afa Tu’minoona’.
  25. Khabrain Newspaper is famous blackmailer. Proofs? (Like this then every Newspaoer should be called blackmailer)
  26. He doesn’t even consider that it was blasphemy case, but rather goes against the judgement of court, saying it abused the law.
  27. ‘Doo takay kay Maulvi’
  28. He doesn’t even consider ‘Yousuf Kazzab’ and this is how he defends him still. Shariat’ rules don’t implement on Yousuf Ali – so we can’t call him Kazzab.
  29. Tells Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat that “They can go to hell”, called them liars, criminals. They have spoiled religion. Call them terrorists. Accused them that the TTP is behind the Ulama of Khatam-e-Nabuwwat. They are Fraud. They are not worth it.
  30. Calls it Deobandi-Brailvi Issue
  31. Called the document of “Khatame-e-Nabuwwat” as ‘Bunch of Rubbish”
  32. He doesn’t give a damn about the Maulvis ( Refering to Khatame-e-Nabuwwat Scholars”)
  33. Says that the High Court is threatend by Maulvis (Refering to Khatame-e-Nabuwwat Scholars”)
  34. Calls the Nizam – Kufar ( If someone else would have said it, would not have been left like that)
  35. Maulvis are corrupt and calls them Fasadi( Refereing again to Khatame-e-Nabuwwat Scholars)
  36. Maulvis ( Refereing again to Khatame-e-Nabuwwat Scholars ) are told to behave. If they don’t behave they will be prosecuted also. This is like making a Fasad.
  37. Proud of his ‘Media’ and says they are ‘The Media’.
  38. There will be no security threat on us. We will ‘threat’ these Maulvis. We haven’t done this yet, and they are coming on top of us just for nothing.
  39. He seenms to defends his claiming of Prophethood, through mystercism and spirtuality.

To sum it up what he said, he holds ‘respect’ the Ulama of Khatame-e-Nabuwwat as follows:

Maulvi, Maulvi Ghusair diyee gayee, Maulvi paisoon ke waja say andar aye, get lashes, naPak Paleet Plan of Maulvis, Ghatiah(low), Bloody liers, Makes fun of their Beards, Imamah’s and makes fun of Aalmi Masjlis e Tuhafzze-e-Nabuwwat, abuses for them, murderers, fasadis, accusers, corrupt, criminals, destroyer of shariah, Do takay kay maulvi, They can go to hell, They are Liers, Fraud, Terrorists, Fasadi. They will be prosecuted if they don’t listen to Zaid Hamid. Tells that he’ll threat the Maulvis.

Document (English): zaid-hamid-accepts-his-link-to-yousuf-kazzab-exegesis
Video (Urdu): zaid-hamid-accepts-his-link-to-yousuf-kazzab-1
Video (Urdu): zaid-hamid-accepts-his-link-to-yousuf-kazzab-2
Video (Urdu): zaid-hamid-accepts-his-link-to-yousuf-kazzab-3

Interview of Maulana Saeed Ahmad Jalalpuri Regarding Yousuf Kazzab & Zaid Hamid

Yesterday (on June 21, 2009), I went to “Aalmi Majlis e Tahaffuz e Khatm e Nubuwwat” (AMTKN) [ Global Majlis for the Protection of Seal of Prophethood] office at Purani Numaish, M.A. Jinnah Road, Masjid Babur Rehmat, Karachi Pakistan. And, I got an opportunity to talk to Maulana Saeed Ahmed Jalalpuri himself, who is the Ameer of AMTKN. I am producing my conversation with respected Maulana below in the form of questions and answers:

Q: Did some one from AMTKN or Ulema Karam actively participate in the case against Yusuf Kazab?

A: Obviously ! the case was registered by Maulana Muhammad Ismail Shuja Abadi on the directions of quaideen of AMTKN

Q: Some people say that the Yusuf Kazab became a victim of Daily Khabrain Editor Zia Shahid’s enmity because Zia Shahid had some land/money dispute with Yusuf Kazab?

A: Suppose, if this was the case, then leave Zia Shahid, and take rest of the evidences, which are too much, coming from too many sources, too strong and too crystal clear in nature. AMTKN challenges any one who have any “proof” that Yusuf Kazab did not claimed to be a prophet, please come forward and AMTKN will listen him/her carefully, analyze those proofs and will clarify its stance publicly with all those proofs and counter-proofs. Its an open challenge for any one.

Q: Maulana, how AMTKN proof that Zaid Hamid was indeed “Syed Zaid Zaman”, the Khalifa of Yusuf Kazab?

A: I recommend you to read my booklet which contain non refutable proof that “Syed Zaid Zaman“, the Khalifa of Yusuf Kazab is none other than Zaid Hamid. AMTKN stand by this document and if Zaid Hamid wants to refute it or prove us wrong than he is more than welcome to visit us any time he like. We would sit together and discuss all counter proofs that he have and inshaAllah there will be khair. Nothing to fight over, its very simple, we have proofs you have counter-proofs, lets sit together and resolve it once and for all.

Q: Maulana do you have all those proofs in the documentation form?

A: Not only do we have those proofs in the documentation form, but those people who were affected by the murtid Yusuf Kazab are in our loop. I have personally met with some of those people as well.

Q: Person A was a follower of Yusuf Kazab, but now he says that he has “nothing to do with Yusuf or his beliefs or any other people like him”. What is the minimum requirement according to Shariah for Person A to come out clear from the mess he was involved in his past?

A: According to Shariah, Person A will have to do the following:

1. Acceptance – Accept publicly and openly that he “did” a mistake by negating the finality of Prophet Muhammad Salalaho Alayhi Wassalam and by following a liar Kazab and a false prophet.
2. Repentance – Repent that what ever he did was indeed a great sin and do Tauba and Astaghfar with Allah Subhanahu Ta’ala.
3. Disassociate – Disassociate publicly and openly that now he is no more a follower of Yusuf Kazab and his beliefs
4. Condemn – Condemn publicly and openly that Yusuf Kazab was indeed a liar and a murtid
5. Tajdeed e Iman – Do tajdeed of Iman (which also includes tajdeed of Aqid e Khatm e Nubuwwat) publicly and openly
6. Tajdeed e Nikah – Do tajdeed of Nikah

Q: [I show Maulana, the responses that Zaid Hamid has given so far and ask his opinion] if they fulfill the requirement of Shariah?

A: No, these vague statements are not enough and does not fulfill the requirements of Shariah (as mentioned in the answer of above question).

Q: Maulana, will AMTKN welcome Zaid Hamid if he wishes to visit you to discuss this issue in detail?

A: I’ve already stated it in clear terms, we will welcome Zaid Hamid to come and discuss this issue. But, I can also tell you one thing, if Zaid Hamid is a culprit and is double crossing then, mark my words, he will never come, he will prefer to drink poison than visiting us at AMTKN office.


Document (English): interview-of-maulana-saeed-ahmad-jalalpuri-regarding-yousuf-kazzab-and-zaid-hamid
Document (Urdu): khatm-e-nubuwwat-scholars-on-zaid-hamid