Refutation: Zaid Hamid claims that the accusers Molvis did not have any proof except Khabrain news

Claim :

Zaid Hamid (Master of History Distortion) claims that the accusers Molvis did not have any proof except Khabrain news. (Below we provide some of the proofs presented in court)

Reply:

The above pages clearly tell that the Khabrain was not only newspaper reporting on this issue so zaid hamid’s this claim also becomes false that the accuser Molana Ismaeel Shuja Abadi did not have any proof except Khabrain news. Some of the evidences which were presented in the court are presented here.

1. Yusuf Kazzab’s audio speech

Yusuf Kazzab’s audio speech ( available on youtube) in which he says himself Muhammad SAW naoozbilah. We will request the readers to please listen this audio again by clicking this link.

Yusuf Kazzab says Sahabi for the present people and Zaid Hamid also speaks in this audio and confirms Yusuf Kazzab’sclaim. (After experts opinion court accepted it as evidence)

2. Yusuf Kazzab’s personal dairy

Yusuf Kazzab’s personal diary in which Yusuf kazzab wrote himself as Muhammad SAW naoozbillah.Here is one
page of his diary

In above page yusuf writes that all the prophets and Nabi were a continual of Muhammad SAW, then All great Sahabis Like Hazrat Abubakar, Umer Usman and Ali (RA) were also continual of Muhammad SAW Then all wali like Abdul QAdir ( jeelani), Mohiyidin, Fareed ud deen ( Gunj Shakar), Mujajad Alf Sani and Muhammad Yusuf Ali ( Himself) are also a continual of Muhammad SAW ( naoozbilah )

In the lower part of page he writes Muhammad SAW always remained in this world and he is also one of his form ( Naoozbillah)

3. Invitation Letter of so-called World Assembly of Muslim Unity

For the conference of his so-called World Assembly of Muslim Unity, Yusuf Kazzab sent an invitation letter to his followers ( was presented in court )

(this invitation was of the same conference in which Yusuf kazzab and Zaid Hamid can be listened in a same audio held on 28 Feb 1997)

Yusuf Kazzab got printed his name only Muhammad on that invitation card and even he put the short sign of (SAW) as we do in URDU.

This was the same session of above invited conference in which Yusuf Kazzab used the words Sahabi for the present people and also invited ZAID Hamid as the first SAHABI.

4. Kazzab’s letters to his followers

Yusuf Kazzab’s letters to his followers in which he claims to be Muhammad and continual of Muhamamd SAW
Naoozbillah were another proof presented in court and the court called experts opinion on the handwriting and it was proved by matching yusuf kazzab’s other documents that the handwriting is same. Here is an example of letter presented in court.

5. Fake Identity Card mentioning Muhammad S/O Ali

Some certificates of school and college were presented in court by which his real name was appearing Yusuf Ali. Later he added Muhammad with his name after retirement and at the end he used only name Muhammad. Even he arranged a fake National Identity card for him which mentioned his name only Muhammad S/O Ali. Copy of that card is below.

6. Statements of Eye Witnesses

zaid hamid claims the only Khabrain news reports were against yusuf Kazzab and Ulema did not have any evidence.. Lets read some statements of eye witnesses presented in court in front of yusuf kazzab (zaid hamid also used to be present in the court as he was following the case) there were total 14 eye witnesses who told the court that yusuf claimed in front of them as Muhammad SAW NaoozBillah.(No witness was the enemy of Yusuf and no one belonged to Molvis) all were ex-followers of Kazzab.


A Little about yusuf Kazzab’s background and personality

Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) said:

“A believer is not stung twice from the same hole”. [Bukhari, Muslim]

Document (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab
Scribd (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab

Source

Judgement of Yousuf Kazzab Blasphemy Case

Under Section 295(C) PPC Yousaf, Accused is, Convicted and sentenced to death and a fine of Rs. 50,000/- and in default thereof to undergo further imprisonment for six months. He shall be hanged by his neck till he is dead. The sentence of death is subject to confirmation of Hong’ble Lahore High Court, Lahore and a reference in this regard shall be sent immediately.
Historical Judgment

Yousaf, Accused, is convicted and sentenced as under

(i) Under Section 295(C) Pakistan Penal Code
Convicted and sentenced to death and a fine Rs. 50,000/- and in defalt thereof to undergo further imprisonment for six months. He shall be hanged by his neck he is dead. The sentence of death is subject to confirmation of Hon’ble Lahore Hight Court, Lahore and a reference in this regard shall be send immediately.

(ii) Under Section 295 (A) Pakistan Penal Code
Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for ten years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 50,000/- and in deafult thereof to further undergo impriosnment for six months.

(iii) Under Section 298 Pakistan Penal Code
Convicted and sentecned to imprisonment for one year rigorous imprisonment and a fine of 10,000/- and in default thereof to further undergo imprisonment for one month.

(iv) Under Section 298 (A) Pakistan Penal Code
Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for three years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 20,000/- and in default thereof to further undergo imprisonment for two month.

(v) Under Section 505(2) Pakistan Penal Code
Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for seven years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 30,000/- and in default thereof to further undergo imprisonment three one month.

(vi) Under Section 420 Pakistan Penal Code
Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for seven years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 20,000/- and in default thereof to further undergo imprisonment for two month.

(vii) Under Section 406 Pakistan Penal Code
Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for seven y ears rigorous imprisonment and a fine of 20,000/- and in default thereos to further undergo imprisonment for two months.

All the sentences, as mentioned above, shall run consecutively because in case of ‘MURTAD’ the court has got no circumstance for any sort of lenient view nor it is permitted in Islam. The accused shall not be given the benefit of Section 382(B) Criminal Procedure Code.

Announced
05.08.2000

SESSIONS JUDGE,
LAHORE

Document (English): judgement-verdict-against-yusuf-kazzab-published-in-book-mentioning-zz-hamid
Image (English): judgement-of-yousuf-kazzab-blasphemy-case