The News: Zaid Hamid bidding for Musharraf says Umar Cheema. September 30,2012

ISLAMABAD: Chief of Army Staff Gen Ashfaq Pervaiz Kayani had echoed the same line on the killing of Nawab Akbar Bugti in a special cabinet meeting on Balochistan as has been taken in the petition of Zaid Hamid, a self-styled security analyst known for close links with the military establishment.

 

Army’s media wing, Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR), was not available for comments. A special committee’s meeting held on May 29 was attended by Gen Kayani, DG ISI Lt. Gen Zahir-ul-Islam, IG FC Balochistan Maj Gen Ubaidullah Khattack, Senator Raza Rabbani and two ministers from Balochistan after the Supreme Court had pushed the government into taking appropriate measures about the restive province. The then Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani presided over the said meeting.

 According to the sources privy to details, Gen. Kayani, for the first time, spoke in detail about Akbar Bugti’s killing and the speculation surrounding his mysterious death. Gen Kayani intervened when a civilian participant held the army and the intelligence agencies under its command responsible for committing the murder.

 The Army chief said he was ready to provide the details of the khaki officers who went inside the cave so that those accusing the army must ascertain from their areas and hometowns whether or not they were killed there on that date. Had the army wanted to murder Akbar Bugti, Gen Kayani argued, five officers would not have been sent inside at any cost.

 They had entered into the cave as Bugti invited them, pretending that he wanted to negotiate. He also asked for independent investigation into the murder mystery to clear the dust, officials privy to the discussion later told The News.

 Incidentally, Gen Pervaiz Musharraf, Kayani’s predecessor under whose watch the murder occurred, echoed the same line in a recent Geo TV programme ‘Awam ki Adalat’ hosted by Iftikhar Ahmad. As he was blamed of this murder, Musharraf told the host that it was mere allegation and explained the operational strategies that won’t allow the officers to enter the premises if the purpose was to kill somebody. He also called for a fair investigation into the matter. Zaid Hamid’s connection with the military establishment is an open secret. A few days ago, a delegation of his ‘think-tank’ Brass Tacks went to Turkey in the company of a military delegation along with the officials of Pak-Turk Institute.

 Incidentally, the petition filed through time-tested friend of khakis, Raja Irshad advocate, echoed the same line taken by Gen. Kayani and his predecessor. Irshad represented ISI in different cases other than army-led FC Balochistan. This shows the military leadership’s desire to clear its name of the murder allegations through demanding judicial inquiry into the matter, according to analysts. The petitioner contends that a team of five Special Forces commandos were invited by late Bugti into his cave to settle terms of surrender but once the officers entered the cave, he triggered an explosive device which brought down the entire cave, killing Bugti and the SSG men. “He committed suicide and also murdered the army officers,” the petition reads.

 The petition added that Bugti had desired to meet the army officers in the cave before he could hand over his custody to the law enforcement agencies. There was no doubt, it is said, that the late Nawab was going to be lodged in a room exclusively arranged for him in the Governor’s House in Quetta. Pervaiz Musharraf has been made one of the respondents in the petition. As demanded by Musharraf, the petition had also sought investigation through a judicial commission comprising serving and retired judges.

Source: The News

Advertisements

Zaid Hamid forbids Modern Medicine.

Zaid Hamid’s latest Facebook update was a video titled  “Most Astonishing Health Disaster of the 20th Century”. The description Zaid Hamid wrote said, “You want to meet the real terrorists and the weapons of mass destruction? These are the doctors and pharma mafia of the Zionist controlled medicine companies.


Every Cult opposes modern inventions. For example an Adventist cult called the Jehovah’s Witnesses forbids its witnesses (members) to receive blood transfusions. If a Witness accepts a blood transfusion, he will be reprimanded, will be told that he’s lost everlasting life and god’s favor and will be expelled from the cult (in the past they were disfellowshipped, but now the cult considers that this is “disassociation”, consequences are the same : no one in the cult will speak to him anymore, including the family members if they are also in the cult). It is not a personal choice. The cult demands its members to refuse blood. They are not allowed to donate or store they own blood for transfusion purposes (autologous transfusion is forbidden).

Similarly, Zaid Hamid has declared allopathic medicine as Weapon of Mass Destruction and Doctors as Terrorists. Ironically, his own son is a third year medical student at Shifa College of Medicine in Islamabad. As a proverb states, Charity begins at home, Zaid Hamid should make his son quit his studies at a terrorist training camp ( Medical College) and begin his quest for alternate medicine. Ajmal Dawa Khana will be a good place to start.

Will Zaid Hamid’s followers in their Ishq e Rasool refrain from visiting a “Terrorist” and a “Mass Murderer” next time they’re standing in their showers and start smelling something sour? Well, Zaid Hamid has forbidden modern medicine so if it’s not causing any pain, they should probably sit and let it drain.


All scholars encourage modern medicine. Today, when people like Zaid Hamid declare Polio vaccination Haram and Un-Islamic, Ulema e Karam come forward and support it. The latest polio vaccination campaign was started by Muhtamim Dar ul Uloom Haqqania, Maulana Sami ul Haq. They have also issued a Fatwa declaring polio vaccination Islamic, countering baseless propaganda by people like Zaid Hamid.

Allah (swt) says in the Qura’n.

O You who have believe!, do not prohibit the good things which Allah has made lawful to you and do not transgress. Indeed, Allah does not like transgressors. [Al-Ma’ida]

Asif Shiraz: A dialogue with Brasstacks and zaidhamidexposition regarding Zaid Hamid and Yousuf Kazzab

We appreciate the sincerity with which Asif Shiraz , an ex-Brasstacks member, has come out and laid down the points in the form of dialogue with Brasstacka & zaidhamidexpositiond and also other Muslim Ummah to explain the matter. Though, as per the advice given by Asif Shiraz, we very much agree on ONE point in this regard, that Yousuf was Kazzab, and Zaid Hamid has to clear himself of it as soon as possible. There is no running away methods available now.

As for the ‘Tasuwwaf’ Talk, we’ll Insha’Allah cater it later in some other post. But as you yourself have explained, that it was Yousuf Kazzab who crossed the ‘red flag‘ himself which has made things very apparent to the Ulama as well as others Mureed who later repented and became witnesses against him, that he misused ‘Tasuwwaf’ to claim himself Prophet (Naozubillah), which is very much clear in his personal dairy which was produced as evidence against him in the court as well, is the thing we can’t let go.

As you have put the advice in a very pleasant way, not only us but the Ulama of Khatm-e-Nabuwwat before us as well, specifically Shaheed-e-Khatm-e-Nabuwwat Maulana Jalalpuri Shaheed (Rahimu’Allah) has advised Zaid Hamid in his two great works “Rahbar kay Roop main Rahzan” and “Poori Pakistani Baradari Jhooti Ya Akela Zaid Zaman Hamid” showing his greatness by his manners and Ikhlaq with which he conveyed the message. Also, I think one can also imagine what the immediate relatives effort would have been to explaining this issue to Zaid Hamid.

Time is running away from him, and we are not left with any options as well other than to stand firm and stay steadfast.

Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6

As of now the personal videos are marked as private and the following note can be found on his youtube channel. We are using another source as of now with this regard and soon will update this to our youtube channel of zaidhamidexposition.

Note: Some of videos have been temporarily removed after assurances from BrassTacks team that they will come out openly in the public about Zaid Hamid’s association with Yousaf Kazzab and explain all the details about it, and either declare him kazzab and his disociation with him, or else bring multiple, credible, renowned scholars who will themselves say that yousaf was not a kazzab.

Update: The videos embedded above were taken offline by Asif Shiraz.

Fatwa Fobia – Zaid Hamid's Historic Article In Defense Of His False Prophet

Although some of the younger generation might have got confused by the sudden U-turn in Zaid Hamid’s stand – who previously was claiming that he had no relationship with Yusuf Kazab, and have now suddenly came out defending the False Prophet.

But the people in the know, are certainly not confused. Zaid Hamid was one of the most aggressive defenders of his False Prophet, throughout the trial of Yusuf Kazab. He was present in all the court hearings, took letters from one place to other asking people to withdraw the case, tried to threaten and blackmail the people involved in the case against Yusuf Kazab. Even after Yusuf was sentenced to death by hanging, Zaid Hamid didnt rested and wrote a splendid piece of defense in favor of his False Prophet in DAILY DAWN. The article was published on 13th Aug 2000. Zaid Hamid himself re-published it on Chowk.  The article is being re-published here:

FATWA-FOBIA

There are a lot of allegedly moderates pakistanis on the chowk, who believe in human rights, who have woRn out their fingers posting about kashmir, the jinnah speach, the tolerant islam in pakistan, the 2% extremists. In supporting the killing of kashmir in the guise of human rights, selfdetermination etc. they are in tune with the mullahs, who prefer the word jihad.

In the following story, if the alleged moderates criticise the blasphemy laws they will be in conflict with the mullah. No, the moderates cannot afford to do that because of the fatwafobia. The human rights blah blah does not apply to pakistani nationals.

Convicted for blasphemy

A kind, benevolent and honourable Muslim Sufi of a small order has been sentenced to death on blasphemy charges by a court in Lahore. I am an eyewitness to what happened in the court and how the prosecution murdered justice, human dignity, Islamic and contemporary law and all norms of humanity in the name of Islam. Mohammad Yusuf Ali is a staunch Muslim and a scholar of the Holy Quran. He has rendered meritorious services to Islam, Pakistan and humanity in his career. It was only a difference of interpretation which was exploited by extremist mullahs and some Urdu newspapers. Yusuf Ali had already spent two years in jail and now he has been convicted.

I was present in the courtroom to assist the defence lawyers. It was barred to the outside world. I am witness to what happened inside and how he has been convicted. The prosecution had based their case on four items: audio cassette of Juma Khutba, video cassettes of Juma Khutba, Yousuf Ali`s purported diary, and one Pir and his few followers, who claimed that he had claimed to be “Muhammad“ in front of them many years ago!

There was nothing objectionable in the cassettes, and even according to Qanoon-i-Shahadat, they were inadmissible, as the one who had made these was not known. They were highly edited, doctored and manipulated.

The diary was not of Yusuf Ali`s at all, and even the prosecution admitted that they were not sure of its origin. It had no name, no handwriting match, no owner. It was simply alleged on Yusuf Ali and was torn to shreds in its originality and credibility.

The Pir and his followers were again torn to shreds, as none of them was the complainant. They never reported the alleged blasphemy to the police or any other authority, which supposedly happened many years ago. Their credibility did not exist at all in terms of contradictions in cross examinations.

One of them was on bail on fraud charges. The complainant had all the info on hearsay. He had never met the accused in his life. All his info was through Urdu newspapers. He accused Yusuf Ali of adultery, but even in the FIR, the relevant section was not mentioned for lack of evidence, making the complainant liable to “Qazaf“. His testimony was not admissible at all.

Yusuf Ali had categorically, even before the registration of the FIR, made it clear through paid ads that he had not claimed to be a prophet and he was a staunch Muslim. Top religious scholars like Maulana Abdul Sattar Niazi had declared him a true Muslim and asked the charges to be dropped. According to all legal and Shariat requirements he had proved himself to be a true Muslim. Still the prosecution insisted that he called himself a prophet. How can anyone be the judge of someone`s faith? The prosecution lawyers went so overboard that even the judge had to stop them from committing blasphemy in trying to prove Yusuf Ali wrong. Even though Yusuf Ali was on bail, he was arrested one day earlier against all rules, laws and norms. It is extraordinary how the bail given by a High Court was cancelled by the Sessions Court and the accused was arrested.

The whole trial was in camera and the media was not allowed in to hear Yusuf Ali`s explanations, his speeches and comments. The media was also barred from seeing the hopelessness of the prosecution witnesses and their lawyers.

It was on this quality of evidence that a great living sufi has been condemned to death on so many counts that we have lost count.

Now Yusuf Ali is in the line for gallows. Will we wait and let the evil win or raise our voices for our own survival?

Z.Z. HAMID

Rawalpindi

This article has been published as part of  our on-going effort to unearth all evidences, past and present against this believer and defender of False Prophet Yusuf Kazab.

Update: The Chowk article has now been removed by Zaid Hamid but the original letter in Daily DAWN can be viewed here Convicted for Blasphemy, Zaid Hamid’s Article In Daily DAWN 13 Aug 2000 [Original Scan]

Zaid Hamid Flees from Islamic University

Thursday, 25-Feb-2010
Daily Ummat, Karachi

The Head of Brasstacks Think-Thank flees in between of the speech
The Islamic University Students asked about Yousuf Kazzab links with Zaid Hamid
  • He flees after being asked about his links with Yousuf Kazzab – The False Prophet
  • No Satisfactory answer was given by him to the audience regarding it
  • The supports of Zaid Hamid tried to shout at those other students who asked those questions
  • Zaid Hamid swithced off his phone.
  • His spokesman ‘Ammar’ denied by saying “He doesn’t know Zaid Hamid and I don’t know what happened.
  • Later, ‘Ammar’ the same spokesman invited Ummat Representative to meet Zaid Hamid directly.

Video Footage:

Newspaper Source:

Document (Urdu): zaid-hamid-flees-from-islamic-university-1
Document (Urdu): zaid-hamid-flees-from-islamic-university-2