As expected, Zaid Hamid failed to show up at Gol Masjid Faisalabad today for his debate with Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi. Ulema and journalists waited for an extended 30 minutes from the original time of 3:00 pm but Zaid hamid never showed up. Earlier today, Zaid Hamid conveyed a message that he will send his “representatives” for the debate but that too turned out to be a lie.
Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi while speaking at the congregation said that he has no personal grudge against Zaid Hamid. He wants Zaid Hamid to come and tell people about his association with a false prophet Yusuf Kazzab and his twisted aqeeda regarding the ‘tehleel’ of Muhammad (saav) into ordinary people.
The congregation went well with the grace of Allah (s.w.t). Maulana Abdul Hafeez Makki announced his support for Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi in his fight against the fitna of Zaid Hamid. He ended the congregation with a du’a in which he asked Allah (s.w.t) to protect the Muslim Ummah from Fitnas like Zaid Hamid and also asked Allah (s.w.t) to help those who have stood firm against the Fitna of Zaid Zaman Hamid.
Tell me something brother. If a person reverts from Atheism into Islam, and starts preaching a good thing, would you blame and accuse him for doing Haraam before his conversion?
When the convert himself admits that he was deluded before and now he knows the way, why would you then suckle onto him when he is trying to preach a good thing? just because you can’t preach what he can?
I am not a fan of zaid hamid or anyone here, but speaking of logic, it is like; tomorrow if Imran khan is on the stead, you would accuse him for farting in public, somewhere in his past?? is that how we should live our lives? Where is Islam now?
This is UTTERLY embarrassing, if not for you.
Muhammad Ali
Brother if Zaid Hamid reverts back to Islam, we will stop everything we are doing now. The point is has he reverted? The answer is No! He defends a false prophet openly and has developed the aqeeda of tahleel of Rooh of Muhammad (saav) into human beings Nauzubillah. Why don’t you look at this matter rather than our exposition of Zaid Hamid. Why don’t you try to find the reason why are we doing what we’re doing.
I don’t understand, you yourself are not sure if he is reverted or not, and you go on abusing his character. Can you show me a source where he admits and submits to that false prophet? Does he not always deny it? Does he not agree that it was the PAST, and the fact that all of this is IR-RELEVANT?
If a good thing is preached even by a Kafir, it is a good thing. Did he preach any shirk? or to follow his past teacher? If so, you may put that to public and then expose his privacy. But really, all I have seen is, reporters go “zaid hamid please abuse your teacher!”
and zain hamid says, “why is that even relevant to the prosperity of Pakistan? and what would happen if I say Kazaab and what if i don’t say it?” and the reporter say “please say it just once” well I have to say it truly is embarrassing and pathetic.
You said: He defends a false prophet openly and has developed the aqeeda of tahleel of Rooh of Muhammad (saav) into human beings Nauzubillah.
I would love to see that please.
Muhammad Ali We are absolutely sure that he has not reverted. If he had, he would not defend his false prophet infront of students of Shifa College of Medicine. This is the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsh3lc9c8sU. His past is not irrelevant as he has been in close association with a False Prophet and he has always refused to call him a Kazzab. I have already shared the link of his defence of Yusuf Kazzab. Watch this video and photos and you will know what is his concept of Tahleel of Rooh of Muhammad (saav). http://zaidhamidexposition.org/2011/08/13/zaid-hamids-supporters-have-started-calling-him-rasool-allah-saaw/.