Zaid Hamid Fails To Show Up For The Debate At Gol Masjid Faisalabad.

As expected, Zaid Hamid failed to show up at Gol Masjid Faisalabad today for his debate with Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi. Ulema and journalists waited for an extended 30 minutes from the original time of 3:00 pm but Zaid hamid never showed up. Earlier today, Zaid Hamid conveyed a message that he will send his “representatives” for the debate but that too turned  out to be a lie.

Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi while speaking at the congregation said that he has no personal grudge against Zaid Hamid. He wants Zaid Hamid to come and tell people about his association with a false prophet Yusuf Kazzab and his twisted aqeeda regarding the ‘tehleel’ of Muhammad (saav) into ordinary people.

The congregation went well with the grace of Allah (s.w.t). Maulana Abdul Hafeez Makki announced his support for Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi in his fight against the fitna of Zaid Hamid. He ended the congregation with a du’a in which he asked Allah (s.w.t) to protect the Muslim Ummah from Fitnas like Zaid Hamid and also asked Allah (s.w.t) to help those who have stood firm against the Fitna of Zaid Zaman Hamid.

4 comments on “Zaid Hamid Fails To Show Up For The Debate At Gol Masjid Faisalabad.

  1. Muhammad Ali says:

    Tell me something brother. If a person reverts from Atheism into Islam, and starts preaching a good thing, would you blame and accuse him for doing Haraam before his conversion?

    When the convert himself admits that he was deluded before and now he knows the way, why would you then suckle onto him when he is trying to preach a good thing? just because you can’t preach what he can?

    I am not a fan of zaid hamid or anyone here, but speaking of logic, it is like; tomorrow if Imran khan is on the stead, you would accuse him for farting in public, somewhere in his past?? is that how we should live our lives? Where is Islam now?

    This is UTTERLY embarrassing, if not for you.

    • Subverter says:

      Muhammad Ali
      Brother if Zaid Hamid reverts back to Islam, we will stop everything we are doing now. The point is has he reverted? The answer is No! He defends a false prophet openly and has developed the aqeeda of tahleel of Rooh of Muhammad (saav) into human beings Nauzubillah. Why don’t you look at this matter rather than our exposition of Zaid Hamid. Why don’t you try to find the reason why are we doing what we’re doing.

  2. Muhammad Ali says:

    I don’t understand, you yourself are not sure if he is reverted or not, and you go on abusing his character. Can you show me a source where he admits and submits to that false prophet? Does he not always deny it? Does he not agree that it was the PAST, and the fact that all of this is IR-RELEVANT?

    If a good thing is preached even by a Kafir, it is a good thing. Did he preach any shirk? or to follow his past teacher? If so, you may put that to public and then expose his privacy. But really, all I have seen is, reporters go “zaid hamid please abuse your teacher!”

    and zain hamid says, “why is that even relevant to the prosperity of Pakistan? and what would happen if I say Kazaab and what if i don’t say it?” and the reporter say “please say it just once” well I have to say it truly is embarrassing and pathetic.

    You said: He defends a false prophet openly and has developed the aqeeda of tahleel of Rooh of Muhammad (saav) into human beings Nauzubillah.

    I would love to see that please.

Leave a Reply to Subverter Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s