Aalya Qureshi You say // The nature and workings of ZHE group have become more appropriate and befitting for someone who loves to hate zaid hamid…. instead of someone who loves Rasool Allah (sm)//.. I wonder if you’ve heard the Islamic terminology of loving and hating for the sake of Allaah (swt). It’s a valid requirement for emaan. That is why one is required to do ba’raah of individuals who dishonour the rasool (s.a.w) .
Zh has challenged the honour of the nabi (s.a.w.) by supporting Yusuf Kazzab. So yes, we hate ZH, due his belief that Yusuf Kazzab was a “sufi scholar” and ” innocent ” and this may be extended those who support him, by defending and finding excuses for ZH beliefs .
This, my brother is true love for Muhammad ( abundant salaams and blessing of Allaah upon him ) .
I’m glad your enjoying your “tens minutes” of fame. But I pray you reconsider this notion as something special, because it only reflects the love of the Duniyah..You should focus more on The Hereafter thats is going to be our true and final abode !
Your proposal in which you suggested to confront ZH with the ayah from (3:61)
” Then whoever disputes with you concerning him [‘Īsā (Jesus)] after (all this) knowledge that has come to you, [i.e. ‘Īsā (Jesus)] being a slave of Allâh, and having no share in Divinity) say: (O Muhammad SAW) “Come, let us call our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves – then we pray and invoke (sincerely) the Curse of Allâh upon those who lie.”
Do you even know what this ayah is about. I can’t even see how you could bring this up as a comparable to a challenge to ZH’s case. You know its a great sin to speak about Allaah (swt) without knowledge. Be warned and fear Allaah (swt).
So before you confuse others on the matter, and others start following you on this , I think I need to clarify the ayah’s standing .
This ayah , was revealed to the prophet (s.a.w) with regards to a delegation of Christians of Najran (in Yemen) who came to visit him . They challenged and argued with the prophet (s.a.w) about Isa (as) . Claiming that he [ Isa(as) ] was devine and the son of Allaah (swt ) Naudhzubillah .This ayah is a challenge to invoke a curse by way of supplication and is called The Challenge of Mubahalah. The Christians new the implcation of this curse if they accepted the Challenge and therefore backed off before it could be pronounced and inadvertedly denouncing their belief. This supplication is so powerful and carrys heavy implications ,that ONLY a messenger/ Rasul of Allaah (swt) is allowed to invoke it.
So tell us how are the two issues comparable and applicable for this invocation to be invoked in ZH case ? ???. I think you have no idea what the implications are, otherwise you wouldn’t have suggested this !!!! The implcations being the curse would continue throughout the family lineage of those who are being cursed. Future family members who would have no opportunity to make it to Jannah.Do you really wish to apply this curse on ZH’s Kids also and on their children etc
You speak of Zaid’s of taubah, were you witness to it ?…You should have been and its followed the correct methodology as per Shariah rules. Because had you been a witness,then your views of ZH beliefs would be clearer to you today. It would have saved you all the trouble that you are going through now and the issue would have ended there and then.
Tell me Asif, why are you still defending ZH ?…It is clear that he still believes that the Kazzab is a ” sufi scholar ” and that an injustice was done by him .
Why then after all the evidence shown on the xposition site, have you not done ba’raah of this lying deceitful man as yet.
I also suggest you don’t divert the issue from such important facts by throwing conjectures and slander upon us.
Please, also look over your post again and see how your defending, a person who has lied to you also, has gone beyond the rational thoughts in your arguements .
// Zaid took up this stance that even though “lying” is haram, “hiding” the facts is permissible when intentions are good, e.g. Hz. Abu Bakr Siddique (rz) “hid” the fact of the Prophet(sm) accompanying him when a guard asked him that who is with him.//
All this points towards again his warped beliefs.
The truth being, Sydena Abu Bakr (ra) protected/accompanied the rasul (s.a.w) because he , Abu Bakr (ra) believed the Nabi was on the Haqq.
This comparison made only incriminates Zaid Hamid further, because it would imply that ZH believes that Yusuf Kazaab is also on Haqq and as a Sahabi of Yusuf Kazaab he was compelled to also protect his Nabi (s.a.w) Naudhzubillah .
Tell us do you also accept this arguement, for you to justify your defence of ZH on this forum ??…
// He never said that the audio is not his: He only said that please bring real owner or recorder of that audio so we can comment on it.//
Interesting, it looks as if he was going to propogate to people to his own beliefs by convincing them the acceptability of the audio with in the privacy and security of his own office enviroment ? ..It is no wonder he can’t go the Ulema Ikram , they would rip him apart. But for a young impressionable person who has limited knowledge of the deeyn. Well thats easy prey really.
Also by him not denouncing that the voice in the audio not being his, only goes to show that he was to bring forth the warped aqaid at some point or another.
// Similarly, there is no one who can say that zaid lied, in any of his emails. yes, he is guilty of hiding things, guilty of giving “broad” statements which circumvented some pointed questions, but that is not lying, technically speaking.//
Look bro, I really don’t mean to be so harsh but really, hiding the truth is circumvent to lying…Please go back to the Qur’an. There is enough evidence there towards this belief.
// I was aware of the “circumvention” and let it happen, indeed participated in it at times, because I genuinely believed that Zaid had done tauba, and the only reason we are circumventing this issue because it will create needless hindrances in an otherwise well-intentioned good work that we are doing.//
Bro , Hitler and his Ummah believed also that they were doing ” well intentioned good work “, it does not mean they were and that it is acceptable by what Allaah (swt) has allowed …Why , you may ask, because their aqaid and moral compass was wrong and not acceptable in Islaam.
My sincerest thoughts for you and others like yourself well beings, is that you guys have to leave him, truly. He has been exposed by the Will of Allaah (swt) for a purpose. Recognise this blessing which Allaah (swt) has bestowed upon all of us and correct your ways and be grateful to Allaah (swt) for it through your actions. distance yourself. This opportunity may not be there for too long .
ZH is on a destructive path , So please don’t go down with him and take the step of warning others from going along with him ! This is the only redeemable factor left for any true Muslim.
It’s also sad that you have come to attack this exposition page of ZH . The man is a danger to Islaam and to others people who believe in him, and to himself.
i believe the rest of the Yusuf Kazaabs followers haven’t come out in the open and have not gathered a large audience or means to convey their warped beliefs.
The risk with ZH is graeter because it has at stake the eemaan of ZH followers . ZH is just paving the way for other deviant believers to come out of their holes.
He is converting an unacceptable belief into something halaal and he has found and built a platform and access/ means to a large audience and group of defenders ( lashkars ). furthermore he will be able to sustain his cause through other business ventures. This is a very dangerous precedent for an individual to have who will use all these resources to carry forth his warped mission .
Brother, the concrete fact is that ZH doesn’t believe that Yusuf Kazab was wrong / a blaspehemer. Because , as his mureed, it is the highest possibility that he holds the same beliefs of his Murshed ( which were full of batil ) where has incorporated them as part of hisr aqaid. Which is clearly evident today, by ZH not being able to disvowel himself from the kazzab.
ZH has been working hard on taking out the water from the well which contains a dead dog ( the Kazzab ) . The rational and honest solution would have been to take the of stinking rotting dog out instead . If not the water is bound to get polluted
lastly, In your arguements You also seems to forget that ZH wants to bring a Shariah system based on the way of Khilafah Rashideen. Tell us did they promote Muscians as role models towards their cause ?…Or encourage the intermingling of the sexes or even abuse and lie about the people who had Knowledge of The Ilm of Allaah (swt) ??
Anyhow, I shall leave you and Zaid Hamdians with this ayah :
Allaah (swt) says, interpretation of the meaning [2: 208 ].
O you who believe! Enter perfectly in Islâm (by obeying all the rules and regulations of the Islâmic religion) and follow not the footsteps of Shaitân (Satan). Verily! He is to you a plain enemy.
Which means by not entering perfectly into Islaam by obeying all the rules and regulations it ordains, one is following the footsteps of the Shaytaan.
Revision Received through comment
Asalaamu ‘alaykum wa rahmatullah
I would like to highlight and clarify some mistakes I have made in my post ..
Firstly , where I have written : ” This comparison made only incriminates Zaid Hamid further, because it would imply that ZH believes that Yusuf Kazaab is also on Haqq and as a Sahabi of Yusuf Kazaab he was compelled to also protect his Nabi (s.a.w) Naudhzubillah .”…
(s.a.w ) was erroneously addded, Astagfirullah…I was referring to Yusuf Kazaab being the Nabi of ZH.
Secondly, With regards to the group of christians who visited the Nabi (s.a.w). Who then went on to refuse the challege, which required invocating the curse in (3:61)…Incase anyone is misguided by my comment where i say ” and inadvertedly denouncing their belief.”, this is not to say that they became Muslims but, instead, to mean that they accepted to pay the Jizyyah . Thereby inadvertedly proving that their conviction and belief in the divinity of Isa (as) and that of him being the son of Allaah ( naudhzubillah ) was actually a weak, doubtful and negatable concept .
I apologise to all and especially to those who i may have misguided in the above two points. may Allaah (swt) forgive me. InshAllaah.
As for the rest of the note, my stand has not changed.
BaraakAllaah Feekum for your kind du’as my brothers and sisters in Islaam , Alhamdulillah , we truly are blessed to be Muslims…. Allaahu Akbar.
May Allaah(swt)guide us all and keep us steadfast on his deeyn. May He forgive and cover our mistakes and may He raise us, in The Herefater, with those He has favored the most. Ameen thumma ameen