Refutation: Zaid Hamid says Yusuf was accused of ZANA (adultery) but Molvis could not prove it so according to Sharia Molvis should be lashed

Claim:

Zaid Hamid says Yusuf was accused of ZANA (adultery) but Molvis could not prove it so according to Sharia Molvis should be lashed ( korray marne chahiye) ( In video Zaid Hamid’s most focused point)

Reply:

Yusuf was not accused for Zana by majlis e Khatam Nabuwwat because according to FIR there is no section of Pakistan Penal Code regarding Zana put on him. There were some eye witness who told Ulema and media that Yusuf kazzab tried to commit adultery with their women. But no one was ready to say this in court because of our traditional hesitation on such sensitive issue. This was an indirect allegation of “Try to commit adultery, not the direct blame of adultery” He was having some “ Roohani nikah” with some of his ladies followers and saying them “Azwaj Mutahraat” Naoozbillah. But it was hard to prove so Majlis e Khatam e Nabuwwat did not insisted on this allegation and if we read the FIR, there is also written the sentence “ tried to commit adultery” and there is no section of PPC regarding adultery put in FIR. Here we present the details of all sections of Pakistan penal Code put in FIR against yusuf Kazzab by Khatam-e-Nabuwwat.

According to FIR all the sections of Pakistan Penal Code
implemented in this case are as below
1. 295A insulting religion
2. 295B Insult of Quran
3. 295C insult of Prophet SAW
4. 298 Uttering word to wound religious feeling
5. 298A use of wrong words about ahl-e-bait and Azwaaj Mutahraat
6. 505(2) creating, spreading rumors against religion or state
7. 805 seems to be misprint (because we could not find this section in PPC) we think it was 508 (Forcing or threatening some one)
8. 420 committing fraud
9. 406 criminal breach of trust

Here is copy of FIR

Below if we see the sections provided by court on which he was sentenced are also among those from FIR.

So how Zaid Hamid says that Ulema accused Yusuf Kazzab for adultery in court and they were not able to provide sharia proof so they should be lashed in public. Did Ulema put a single section of PPC regarding Zana in FIR ? If not then Zaid himself should be lashed for Qazzaf as he is blaming baseless.

Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) said:

“A believer is not stung twice from the same hole”. [Bukhari, Muslim]

Document (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab
Scribd (English): reply-to-zaid-hamid-defense-of-yousuf-kazzab

Source

9 comments on “Refutation: Zaid Hamid says Yusuf was accused of ZANA (adultery) but Molvis could not prove it so according to Sharia Molvis should be lashed

  1. […] There was no need to provide evidences for adultery since the complainants never filed an FIR accusing Yusuf Kazab of adultery. For details see Refutation: Zaid Hamid says Yusuf Kazab was accused of Adultery. […]

  2. […] could not prove the claim of adultery. They did not accuse Yousuf Kazzab of adultery! Readhere. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Zaid Hamid Admits Knowing Yousuf Ali (Kazzab), […]

  3. Junaid says:

    CASE FIR NO. 70/97 DATED 29-3-1997 OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 295-C, 295-A, 298, 298-A, 505 PART-II, 508, 420, 406 PPC AND SECTION 18 READ WITH SECTION 10 OF OFFENCE OF ZINA (ENFORCEMENT OF HUDOOD) ORDINANCE NO. VII OF 1979 POLICE STATION MILLAT PARK, LAHORE. CHARGE-SHEET.

    These were the charges against him and ZINA is included.
    Please rewrite your entry to cater it

  4. Junaid says:

    CASE FIR NO. 70/97 DATED 29-3-1997 OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 295-C, 295-A, 298, 298-A, 505 PART-II, 508, 420, 406 PPC AND SECTION 18 READ WITH SECTION 10 OF OFFENCE OF ZINA (ENFORCEMENT OF HUDOOD) ORDINANCE NO. VII OF 1979 POLICE STATION MILLAT PARK, LAHORE. CHARGE-SHEET.

    FIR scanned copy posted earlier doesnot mention the whole CHARGE please include this in that pink colored paper scan

  5. Junaid says:

    Can someone enlighten me regarding this “charges pressed” and “proved in court” thing I have a very basic understanding of court matters.
    For intance , what happens if you can’t prove a charge pressed?
    Do every charge must be proved ?

  6. Junaid says:

    brother, make changes to this entry or remove it..

  7. Tahir Ali says:

    junaid’s point must not go unnoticed; it should be answered if it is wrong. Or else changes should be made into the blog if this true.

  8. rana alamgir says:

    FIR men saaf nazar aa reha hai ke iss ne badkaari ki koshish ki. aur Islam men aisay matters men jhooti tuhment laganay walay per QAZAF lagti hai

    decision men to yeh hai ke iss per jhootay nabi honay ka charge prove nahi huwa but Khilfat e Uzma ke claim per Death sentence huwi hai aur badkaari ki attempt per bhi koi saza nahi

    so Isamil Shujabadi ko QAZAF to lagti hai,, ZAID HAMID ki statement true hai iss matter men

    Yaar ek kaam kero,, kisi din apnay saray evidence ki ek copy tyar kero aur approach kero ZAID HAMID ko… face to face argue kero ge to khud pata lag jaye ga ke kon sacha hai

    main tum logon ki niyat per shak nahi kerta, mujhe yaqeen hai ke tum log bhi ISHQ e RASOOL men yeh kaam ker rehay ho.. per tehqeeqaat ke liye zarori hai ke doosri part ka point of view bhi liya jaye,,,

  9. Abu Muhammad says:

    @ Rana Alamgir

    1. Khatm-e-Nabuwwat nay Zaid Hamid ko open challenge day dia hai. Aap kiunkah Zaid Hamid kay buhat kareeb lagtay hain, un ko mashwara day kah Munazira kay challenge kabool kar lay.

    2. Buhat saray bhayee idhar a kar yah proof karna chah rahay hai kah “Zina” Sabit ni hoya. Aap barayee meharbani uss ko ghaur say daikh lain kay charge sheet kia hai. Charge sheet main jo statement lagee hai woh hai “Attempt of ZINA” NOT “Act of ZINA”. Ulama ko aap say ziyada pata hai kah agar woh had “Act of ZINA” lagayeen gay tu ilzaam sabit tabhe hoo ga jab ghawah hoon gay. Isse liyee yah “Attempt of ZINA” ka charge hai, jiss par QAZAF ni hotee. In short Urdu main “Badkari ke kooshish” par QAZAF ni hotee, lakin agar koi kahay kah “Badkarii kee” aur na proove kar sakaay tu phir Kazaf hai. Yeah Ilzaam bhe durusat thaa, lakin hamaray muash’ray main khawateen is maslay main kiunkah openly ni bool sakteen, isee waja say yah ni proove ho saka. Warna iss main koi shak ni kah Yousuf Kazzab nay “Roohani Biwian” banayee hoyeen theen aur un kay sath badkardari ka fa’il karta bhe thaa. Yeah umeed hai aap kay jawab ke tardeed hoyee.

    3. Umeed hai aap kay sawaloon ka jawab hoyaa. Zaid Hamid say ilam seekhnay kee bajayee Ulama say rajoo karain maslay ko samajhnay kay liyeee

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s