Fatwa Fobia – Zaid Hamid's Historic Article In Defense Of His False Prophet

Although some of the younger generation might have got confused by the sudden U-turn in Zaid Hamid’s stand – who previously was claiming that he had no relationship with Yusuf Kazab, and have now suddenly came out defending the False Prophet.

But the people in the know, are certainly not confused. Zaid Hamid was one of the most aggressive defenders of his False Prophet, throughout the trial of Yusuf Kazab. He was present in all the court hearings, took letters from one place to other asking people to withdraw the case, tried to threaten and blackmail the people involved in the case against Yusuf Kazab. Even after Yusuf was sentenced to death by hanging, Zaid Hamid didnt rested and wrote a splendid piece of defense in favor of his False Prophet in DAILY DAWN. The article was published on 13th Aug 2000. Zaid Hamid himself re-published it on Chowk.  The article is being re-published here:


There are a lot of allegedly moderates pakistanis on the chowk, who believe in human rights, who have woRn out their fingers posting about kashmir, the jinnah speach, the tolerant islam in pakistan, the 2% extremists. In supporting the killing of kashmir in the guise of human rights, selfdetermination etc. they are in tune with the mullahs, who prefer the word jihad.

In the following story, if the alleged moderates criticise the blasphemy laws they will be in conflict with the mullah. No, the moderates cannot afford to do that because of the fatwafobia. The human rights blah blah does not apply to pakistani nationals.

Convicted for blasphemy

A kind, benevolent and honourable Muslim Sufi of a small order has been sentenced to death on blasphemy charges by a court in Lahore. I am an eyewitness to what happened in the court and how the prosecution murdered justice, human dignity, Islamic and contemporary law and all norms of humanity in the name of Islam. Mohammad Yusuf Ali is a staunch Muslim and a scholar of the Holy Quran. He has rendered meritorious services to Islam, Pakistan and humanity in his career. It was only a difference of interpretation which was exploited by extremist mullahs and some Urdu newspapers. Yusuf Ali had already spent two years in jail and now he has been convicted.

I was present in the courtroom to assist the defence lawyers. It was barred to the outside world. I am witness to what happened inside and how he has been convicted. The prosecution had based their case on four items: audio cassette of Juma Khutba, video cassettes of Juma Khutba, Yousuf Ali`s purported diary, and one Pir and his few followers, who claimed that he had claimed to be “Muhammad“ in front of them many years ago!

There was nothing objectionable in the cassettes, and even according to Qanoon-i-Shahadat, they were inadmissible, as the one who had made these was not known. They were highly edited, doctored and manipulated.

The diary was not of Yusuf Ali`s at all, and even the prosecution admitted that they were not sure of its origin. It had no name, no handwriting match, no owner. It was simply alleged on Yusuf Ali and was torn to shreds in its originality and credibility.

The Pir and his followers were again torn to shreds, as none of them was the complainant. They never reported the alleged blasphemy to the police or any other authority, which supposedly happened many years ago. Their credibility did not exist at all in terms of contradictions in cross examinations.

One of them was on bail on fraud charges. The complainant had all the info on hearsay. He had never met the accused in his life. All his info was through Urdu newspapers. He accused Yusuf Ali of adultery, but even in the FIR, the relevant section was not mentioned for lack of evidence, making the complainant liable to “Qazaf“. His testimony was not admissible at all.

Yusuf Ali had categorically, even before the registration of the FIR, made it clear through paid ads that he had not claimed to be a prophet and he was a staunch Muslim. Top religious scholars like Maulana Abdul Sattar Niazi had declared him a true Muslim and asked the charges to be dropped. According to all legal and Shariat requirements he had proved himself to be a true Muslim. Still the prosecution insisted that he called himself a prophet. How can anyone be the judge of someone`s faith? The prosecution lawyers went so overboard that even the judge had to stop them from committing blasphemy in trying to prove Yusuf Ali wrong. Even though Yusuf Ali was on bail, he was arrested one day earlier against all rules, laws and norms. It is extraordinary how the bail given by a High Court was cancelled by the Sessions Court and the accused was arrested.

The whole trial was in camera and the media was not allowed in to hear Yusuf Ali`s explanations, his speeches and comments. The media was also barred from seeing the hopelessness of the prosecution witnesses and their lawyers.

It was on this quality of evidence that a great living sufi has been condemned to death on so many counts that we have lost count.

Now Yusuf Ali is in the line for gallows. Will we wait and let the evil win or raise our voices for our own survival?



This article has been published as part of  our on-going effort to unearth all evidences, past and present against this believer and defender of False Prophet Yusuf Kazab.

Update: The Chowk article has now been removed by Zaid Hamid but the original letter in Daily DAWN can be viewed here Convicted for Blasphemy, Zaid Hamid’s Article In Daily DAWN 13 Aug 2000 [Original Scan]

74 comments on “Fatwa Fobia – Zaid Hamid's Historic Article In Defense Of His False Prophet

  1. Abu Muhammad says:

    @ Kkhan

    It is better you keep your retarded Caliphate System to yourself preached by Zaid Hamid. We are not in need of such Khilafah.

    Stop lying that Abdul Sattar Niazi, was defending , Yousuf Kazzb – a statement that you’ve ranted from Zaid Hamid camp.

    Your sick absurd arguments are nothing to worth even a reply and stop your useless debates to defend Yousuf Kazzab, on the pattern of Zaid Hamid.

    Had you concerned yourself more of Rasulullah (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam), than to defend a convicted Blasphemer – Yousuf Kazzab – backed by 24 witness, you’d be in a more sensible position.

    Don’t bother to reply now unncessarily, as no useless comments will be entertained. You’ve explained your point and it is clear for others to read and we have ours. Now better be quiet now and wait till the time comes when you will understand what we are saying.

  2. Muhammad Avais says:

    @ Abdul Rahman:
    Just answer my question first
    “Have you heard all three audio tapes of Yousuf Kazzab?”
    This is one of so many proofs.. just answer and if you have then wat do u think abt them??
    And Inshallah soon you guys are gonna see some eye opening facts about zaid hamid’s past
    Tell your boss zaid hamid.. hide watever he can.. he cant stop us:)

  3. Abdul Rehman says:

    @Abu Muhammad…..

    The thing is that I can make a 100 audio cassetes in your voice and make it sound exactly like you…. The only problem is that you are not will to listen to any other verdict… I have listened to the audios and if you are 100% sure that these audios are his and you didn’t just post them without tehkeek then its okay….

    And in the case of Maulana’s shahadat…. Did you hear yourself Zaid Hamid telling someone to kill him or do you have proof of that he killed him…. My only point is that “Not guilty until proven otherwise” and not the other way around which is i think you believe in as you bluntly say that you are 100% sure that he killed him…. I am not saying he didn’t kill him but neither you should say that until its proven…. But I think you are too arrogant to actually take my arguments with an OPEN MIND which was my first post and not read my post trying to find loopholes in it….. As per your court thing…. So you believe that if he court has made the decision then its correct…. So then i guess you believe that Diamond Market (Heera mandi) in Lahore is right as it has been legalized by the Supreme court of Pakistan and that too in the light of Islam…. If you don’t believe me see the court verdict…. So don’t give a court ruling as a final verdict without giving anyone else the right to challenge the verdict….

    @Muhammad Avais….
    This is the cry of the most people that they wanna see the facts and not some without proof allegations…. I tell you if you present some credible facts and evidence no one i mean no one will support Zaid Hamid…. And I am not interested in Zaid Hamid as I don’t like his Zionist views anyways…. So show some respect and calling him anyones boss…. But the thing is that they way you people are going about stuff I see a very messy situation arising… Thats my only concern as don’t want an addition in the series of Shia-Sunni, Deobandi-Barelvi sort of fasadats in the country….

    I thought there were questions and answers going here…. But instead of answering my core questions you just tell me to shut up… :/… I just asked for a CREDIBLE proof of Zaid Hamid committing Blasphemy nothing else…. And to be honest i couldn’t find any on your whole site…. So don’t you think if you can’t prove or any of the Mulanas are not able to prove then all of you (according to Islam) are liable to the same punishment as that of Blasphemy???? Just think with a cool mind and not an angry mind….

  4. Muhammad Avais says:

    @ Abdul Rahman:
    i am not angry instead i want to laugh:) My dear brother.. These tapes which you are putting doubt on.. were at no point denied by yousuf himself.. just go through the court documents.. they were only opposed due to a technical reason that our law still lives in 70’s era and such things are not given equal stand as other SHAHADATs.. but again i would repeat, at no point yousuf or his lawyers said that these are manipulated tapes or this is not his voice.. instead when he was asked by the judge, his lawyer said my client doesnt want to answer this question.. (plz do some hassel nd go through his case docs or go to session court and get the copies yourself..)
    Secondly.. if you want to get into argument abt anything you can.. i have scientific argument that there is no day or night in space.. So can i call NAUZUBILLAH Quran wrong that its teachings are only for earth not beyond it..??? point is.. my dear.. if you want to confront anything u can do so.. but just for my information and knowledge what do you think can be a good and acceptable proof against yousuf kazzab?? i really want to know that..otherwise i have to blv that you are like other zaidians who argue that coz yousuf is dead so leave the matter rest in peace:)

  5. Muhammad Avais says:

    @ Abdul Rahman:
    accept my apologies to call zaid hamid your boss as you have condemed him so i dont have any right to associate you with him. Baki dilon ka haal Allah Janta hay.

  6. Jalal says:

    yar there is some GREAT conspiracy..pata hai kia!frankly im very confused and i can c many others like me..i want to bring things to light…from both parties-i will be writing an article inshaAllah on this soon.

    Terming all Molana Sahibans fasadi is naive to say the least. Zaid Hamid is clearly hiding sth.he is not clearcut.He has been given chances by molanas todo toba,proclaim innocence,repent and what not.

    but on the other hand,think rationally from his pov.maybe he thinks this controversy if he accepts or repents,would be tantamount to a sharp decline in his fan following-i tell u,most of the ppl in wake up group are ultra-ISLAMIC but they CANT BELIEVE ZH cud be a fraudster.

    Afterall,all his debates,his personality,his charm and when u talk one-to-one he seems like a mujahid.

    I dont want to drag any1 in any undue controversy unless IM SURE!

    dekho why did this matter,all the hype and everything,why didnt it come to light when ZH was not that famous i.e between 1999 and 2008/09!!!he was airing shows back then too–were the muftis aloof then?


  7. Abdullah says:


    You said,

    “dekho why did this matter,all the hype and everything,why didnt it come to light when ZH was not that famous i.e between 1999 and 2008/09!!!he was airing shows back then too–were the muftis aloof then?”

    Can you please share with us any show from Zaid Hamid between 1999 and 2008??

    NONE Exist.

    And as a matter of fact, as soon as his BrassTack’s Economic Terrorism came, Mufti Saeed Jalalpuri’s article “Rahbar ke roop mein Rahzan” came online and spread widely.

    There is no doubt that Zaid has up to particular agenda and according to many learned sources, he is implanting ISI propaganda under the disguise of Khilafah and Islam. Don’t you wonder, had not Zaid Hamid appeared on TV, none of the Pakistanis were celebrating massacre of Mujahideen in tribal areas at the hand of this US Slave Army.

    Think about it too.

  8. Talal says:

    I find absolutely NOTHING wrong with this article. I will, of course, do more research on this Yousuf Kazzab matter and then follow what I believe is the correct path regarding Zaid Hamid. Moreover, I find NO proof that this article was written by Zaid Hamid himself, neither on this website nor on Chowk :/

  9. Usama Abdul Qayyum says:

    I want to ask a simple straight logical question those people, who say that Zaid Hamid initially refused any links to ‘Yousuf Kazzab’ and now admits the acquaintance, my question is: “IF SOMEBODY ASKS ZAID HAMID IF HE KNOWS YOUSUF ‘KAZZAB’, HOW CAN HE SAY ‘YES’ BECAUSE OF THE SIMPLE FACT THAT HE DOESN’T BELIEVE THAT HE WAS ACTUALLY KAZZAB/CLAMIED PROPHETHOOD??” secondly
    *one newspaper(Khabrain) out of dozens of leading papers(Jung, Nawa e Waqt etc) raised Yousuf’s issues, why not other newspapers??
    *For the last many months I’ve heard Hazoor S.A.W’s name and darood from his mouth hundreds of times with such great respect and his overall outfit and personality doesn’t look anything else other than being a staunch muslim…what a joke has been going on against him is simply beyond my understanding.

  10. Usama Abdul Qayyum says:

    And I can not understand that the article written by Zaid Hamid is presented against him in which he actually refutes all allegations with logical and strong knowledge-based points. Are these allegations and the people behind them are so dumb and with such a low IQ that they present the same article against its author himself who wrote it to prove himself innocence?? this is an open question: where is the proof of blasphemy???? is that a very hard question?? I have gone through all his speeches, the audio-tap ‘evidence’, the newspaper ‘Khabrain’ reports, Khatm e Nabuwwat site, NONE has a single bit of convincing and logical evidence!! please KOI HAI JO ALLAH K AZAAB SE DARE AUR HOSH SE KAAM LE?? HAI KOI??

  11. Usama Abdul Qayyum says:

    And most importantly the question is: “what is your take on the loud and clear statement by Maulana Abdul Sattar Niazi,(the great Islamic scholar and jailed with Maulana Maudodi because he stood against Qadiyani fitnas), in which he said: “YOUSUF KI TAQAREER SAMAJHNEY MEIN BOHUT GHALTI KI GAI HAI”…again open question, just answer this logically and I’ll be convinced..Maulana Niazi always said that Yousf didn’t commit blasphemy and its just the deviated interpretation of his speeches..for God’s sake where is the truth gone? why not answer directly about Maulana Niazi’s clear statements documented in newspapers??

  12. talha qamar says:

    the curse of Allah upon the liars.

  13. Abu Muhammad says:

    @ Usama Abdul Qayyum

    Would you mind going through our blog properly.

    The Case against Zaid Hamid

    Yousuf Kazzab Personal Diary

    Fatwa against Yousuf Kazzab

    Yousuf Kazzab Case Full Court Proceedings

    All the refutation of your questions are in them.

    Go through these evidences, if you still think they are not blasphemous, then May Allah help you.

  14. Muhammad Avais says:

    @ Usama Abdul Qayum:
    Brother, first of all you go through all the blog properly if you love zaid hamid so much and ask question which are not answered.
    Secondly, here is a question which i asked another very active person and he never replied..
    What do you think is a credible and solid proof which can show if someone has done blasphemy?
    or in simple words “what kind of proof you want against yousuf kazzab? plz be specific.”

  15. Abdullah says:

    another article by zaid hamid in favour of kazzab.and a post by a mureed called abrar mustafa both before his death,they also give refrence to a website http://www.wahe.net which is dead..im trying to get thhe domain details of who ran the website.anyone know how to can help?

    jazakAllah Abdullah

    Jan 29th, 2001, 08:48 AM
    A DEADLY CRISIS is simmering in South-East Asia region where religious
    extremism and an intolerant culture is fast escalating. A case in point
    is of a moderate Muslim scholar in Pakistan, Mr Muhemmed Yusuf Ali, an
    activist of Peace, religious tolerance and human excellence. He has been
    condemned to death and 35 years of rigorous imprisonment on 5th August
    2000 by a lower in Pakistan under the pressure of a local religious
    organization on the baseless allegations of blasphemy. Moreover, without
    any evidence and without any authority, the lower court has called him
    liar (kazzab), kafir (infidel), murtad (apostate) against all
    requirements of justice and Islamic Shari’ah.

    Religious zealots in Pakistan are highly abusing vaguely formulated Law
    of Blasphemy as a handy-tool to harass and prosecute those who
    challenge their power-base by calling for sectarian harmony and
    religious tolerance or hold divergent religious beliefs.

    Mr Muhemmed Yusuf Ali, a staunch Muslim of Ahl-e-Sunnah school of
    thought, has been actively working against growing religious extremism
    and human excellence for last two decades. He wrote columns and articles
    in Daily Pakistan for 5 years, and trained people around the world for
    more than 15 years. He openly spoke against extremist elements of
    religious clergy in Pakistan, and often said in his recorded interviews,
    today Islam portrayed in Muslim countries by religious clergy is a
    highly distorted version of real Islam  a way of living with love &
    peace, and serving the Creator and creation. 

    In 1997, Mr Yusuf Ali stepped up his efforts to serve humanity and on
    28th February arranged the first assembly of an association founded by
    himself (World Assembly for Human Excellence) in a local mosque. In
    reaction, his opponents started a vilification campaign against him in
    the local press. He was accused of adultery, fraud, claiming
    prophet-hood, and blasphemy against Islam. He clarified his position
    through paid advertisements in the newspapers. But, a case was
    maliciously registered against him on 29th March 1997 by a local
    religious organisation. He was immediately detained and locked up in a
    prison in inhumanly conditions for a period of 2 years.

    Judiciary kept avoiding hearing his case to stay away from argument with
    religious extremists. After 2 years of detention he was released on bail
    on statutory grounds. A trial finally started in February 2000. However,
    against all hopes and (as Amnesty International reports) in
    contravention of international fair trial standards, the trial was
    conducted in the private chamber of the learned judge, in camera, and in
    an oppressive atmosphere. No independent observers or media
    representatives were allowed in. Most of the hearings were commenced at
    about 2:30pm and continued till as late as 7-8pm. The final arguments
    were heard on 28th July till 11:45pm, and the counsel for the defence
    were asked to conclude.

    Mr Muhemmed Yusuf Ali denied all allegations in their entirety. (Verdict
    available at http://www.wahe.net)
    According to the trial record the complainant, office bearer of a local
    religious organization, alleged that Mr Yusuf Ali ‘indirectly committed
    blasphemy’ by showing his resemblance with Prophet Muhemmad (peace be
    upon him) on an unknown date, during a Friday sermon, more than 2 years
    before registration of the case. The complainant also admitted that all
    his information were based on word of mouth and unfounded reports
    published in a local newspaper.

    The learned judge of Pakistan’s lower court found no evidence of
    adultery, as the complainant could not produce any information to
    support false allegation. No proper evidence of blasphemy or fraud was
    produced in the court except a few peoples word against Mr Yusuf Alis,
    including a local newspaper reporter who reported the fabricated stories
    in the first place. The complainant produced video/audio pieces of
    several sermons copied onto two cassettes. Nothing objectionable or
    offensive was found in the sermons. The date of sermons and maker of
    cassette were unknown, which make the produced evidence highly
    unreliable and legally inadmissible.

    Honourable Judge acknowledges in his verdict that evidence in this case
    was oral in nature. In his verdict, Judge accepts the complainants word
    against Mr Yusuf Alis. He praises the complainants religious
    organization, on record, and gives them credit of bringing provisions of
    blasphemy law in the Pakistan Penal Code. However, he nullifies the
    statement of Mr Muhemmed Yusuf Ali in his defence by simply calling him
    a liar! Mr Muhemmed Yusuf Ali testified during the trial that according
    to Islamic beliefs all human beings are representative of God Almighty
    and all Muslims should also strive to be a representative of Prophet
    Muhemmed (peace be upon him). He advocated that to gain human excellence
    all human-being should respect each other and live life according to
    examples set by their great leaders such as Prophet Muhemmed, Prophet
    Jesus, Prophet Moses, Mahatama Buddha (peace be upon them). Mr Yusuf Ali
    admitted that he himself lives life according to teachings, examples and
    guidance of Last Prophet Muhemmed (peace be upon him), strives to fulfil
    his mission, and considers himself his humble and true representative.
    However, the judge deduced that the last statement amounts to indirectly
    committing blasphemy. He declared Mr Yusuf Ali an infidel, an apostate,
    liable to death, and 35 years of rigorous imprisonment on several

    A number of oft consulted Islamic scholars in juristic matters of
    international repute, have declared the verdict of Pakistani lower court
    unfounded, invalid and against all norms of dispensing justice. However,
    Mr Muhemmed Yusuf Ali is again languishing behind bars in a C  class
    cell with fast deteriorating health, with no medical facilities, waiting
    for a fair trial. His family and his own life is in danger from
    religious extremists.


    *Negahe Marde Momin Se Badal Jate Hai Taqdeeren*

    I should have made the link more conspicous, but it is nevertheless present in the message. Each and every detail about the case, (from the legal perspective) as well as our complete profile, and other Muslim Scholar’s opinion etc. are all available at the web site. It is
    ————- http://www.wahe.net

    Masha’Allah…This site is very informative, very well presented and compiled with great love of Allah (swt) and Hazoor Muhemmed (saaw). May the contributors of this site receive barakah and khair in both worlds. I request visitors to vist the site http://www.wahe.net and support the humble efforts to present Islam to achieve Human Excellence, and also serve a Human being from 35 years of prison term and death penalty given to him to abort his mission. Jizak Allah-o-Khairan fil Dunya wal Akhira
    Abrar Mustafa
    Brussels, BELGIUM – Tuesday, September 19, 2000 at 11:18:05 (PDT)

  16. Imran says:

    Why is that we always have to choose sides, and judge every person …. We know and understand our religion …. why simply we can take good from Zaid Hamid, and what we feel is wrong, we can leave it … He is not our Imam or Prophet … he is simply a man helping our youth for a direction …if u feel that direction is wrong .. then take the other path …

  17. Abu Muhammad says:

    @ Imran

    Just like you don’t like any Qadynai (Kafir) to lead you. Similarly we can’t afford a Mulhid to lead us as well.

    Can you imagine the companion of Musalima Kazzab leading you and you’ll give same comment? I say, one would really feel foolish.

  18. Shahid says:

    I am not a fan of Zahid Hamid but I am uanable to find any thing wrong with this article. He is explaining things with logic. And we know how much our judicial system was independent at that time. What happened to Zulfiqar Ali. Blasphemy law in Pakistan is very loose any way. One can blame any one in Pakistan as NON-MUSLIM and then get away with it. In other muslim countries like SAudia or Egypt if you wrongly blam any one as non-muslim then you also face death penalty. But in Pakistan this law is being used to finish your rivals easily and cleanly.

  19. Rehan Ahmed says:

    Dear Zaid Hamid fans,

    Life is only one time chance and we cannot put our Akhira on trail just like that so instead of following someone blindly or have faith in someone blindly. It is clear that he is kahlifa of yousaf Kazzab and Zaid Hamid called him ” Marde-Momin” when called on the stage. Zaid Hamid voice can be recognized easily in those audio recordings available on Youtube. Still he defends him and not given a clear statement against him. This certainly makes his position doubtful. I strongly believe in specialization i.e no one goes to an Engineer for medical check ups and no one goes to Doctor for constructions. Likewise Deen Islam should be taken from the righteous people who have done specialization in their field and those who fear Allah. Alhumdullillah we have lot of righteous God fearing scholars of Islam in Pakistan.

    Could you imagine yourself standing with yousaf Qazzab and Zaid Hamid alongside Salman Rushdee and other blasphemers on the day of Qiyyamah ???? while Messenger Sayyinda Mohammad Sullaho alayhi wassalam along with Sahabaz Rizwanullah ajmaeen stands on other side????

    So think again wisely instead of being emotionally blackmailed with false patriotism and Hubbe-Rasool. Give up naray bazee and be a real realistic. One thing I keep observing that the more I study Yousaf Qazzab and the more I listen to Zaid Hamid I find more and more similarities between the two. He is a true follower of his guru for sure.

    I urge again do not put your Akhirah on trail just because of one person Zaid Hamid who has tazad in his “Qol & fail”. He is not our role model …Being a Muslim our role models should be Messenger Salullaho alayhi wassalam and sahaba and the righteous Ullema, Sufeez and Mujahids those who followed Islam in its true n pure form.

    My brothers & sisters in Islam, I can assist you in finding the right leadership, which will benefit you in Akhira Insha Allah. Please feel free to contact your bro.


    Rehan Ahmed

  20. readinglord says:

    The man by nature is not cruel but he is liable to a faith, how absurd it may be, to be cruel.

    [Moderated By: Abu Muhammad]
    [Remarks: I’d like to make it very clear that the “demolish of a Masjid is one of the greatest sins VS hurting someone hurt”. They both are incomparable. It is completely not Islamic to even have a slightest belief or thinking regarding this. Now you might say, one shouldn’t go to the apparent meaning of the poetry, rather metaphorical. This logic is absurd. ]

  21. […] to    shake    the testimony of a witness. [Editor's Note: Zaid Hamid in his article written in DAILY DAWN claimed that one of the witnesses was on bail on fraud charges. That was not the case, he only had […]

  22. khan says:

    thanks you changed my mind!!

  23. sualeha says:

    may Allah bless u all for unleashing this modern fitna.Each and every individual who returns back to the right path will owe you so much which the eye cant see and mind cant imagine.
    may Allah give u the best jaza for all ur work.Ameen

  24. Shahzad says:

    Dear All, Please excuse my ignorance, but I need to ask a question regarding the blasphemy law. what is the status of someone in the light of Shariat, who is accused of blasphemy, but pleads publicaly that he had not intended what others interpreted as blasphemy? Secondly, if by an independent judgment, it is proven that the comments are actually blasphemous, what are the possibilities of recanting them with a public apology aimed at Tauba. Do the principles of Tauba apply to such acts?

Leave a Reply to Shahid Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s